CVE-2026-54707

CVE-2026-54707 is a medium-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in onionshare-cli (pip), affecting versions < 2.6.4. It is fixed in 2.6.4.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

OnionShare Receive mode writes uploaded files even when file uploads are disabled

OnionShare CLI/Desktop 2.6.3 does not enforce the Receive mode disable_files setting at the file upload sink. When a Receive service is configured as a text-message-only endpoint (--disable-files / "Disable uploading files"), a remote sender who can reach the OnionShare service can still send a crafted multipart request containing file[]; OnionShare writes the uploaded bytes to disk before the route handler skips file accounting.

This affects the shipped onionshare-cli Python package and the desktop application because both use the same onionshare_cli.web.receive_mode request-streaming implementation.

Details

Tested repository: https://github.com/onionshare/onionshare at commit 8cc75e1d7e88bd31f7276733449d412bf71c8999.

Affected product evidence:

  • cli/pyproject.toml declares onionshare_cli version 2.6.3.
  • desktop/pyproject.toml declares onionshare version 2.6.3 and depends on onionshare_cli from ../cli.
  • cli/setup.py publishes onionshare-cli and includes onionshare_cli.web plus templates/static resources.
  • desktop/setup.py publishes onionshare and exposes both onionshare and onionshare-cli console scripts.

Reachable default/common paths:

  • CLI Receive mode is exposed through --receive (cli/onionshare_cli/__init__.py:55-57).
  • The --disable-files option is documented and stored in mode settings (cli/onionshare_cli/__init__.py:156-160, cli/onionshare_cli/__init__.py:254-261).
  • Desktop Receive mode exposes the same setting via the "Disable uploading files" checkbox and stores it as receive.disable_files (desktop/onionshare/tab/mode/receive_mode/__init__.py:89-99, desktop/onionshare/tab/mode/receive_mode/__init__.py:246-254).
  • User documentation says "Disable uploading files" should "only allow submitting text messages, like for an anonymous contact form" (docs/source/features.rst:64).
  • Advanced documentation lists --disable-files and disable_files as the option to disable receiving files (docs/source/advanced.rst:162-163, docs/source/advanced.rst:455).

Root cause:

  • The Receive template hides the file input when disable_files is set (cli/onionshare_cli/resources/templates/receive.html:51-56), but this is only UI-side.
  • The /upload route skips request.files.getlist("file[]") and file accounting when disable_files is enabled (cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:96-135). However, by this point Werkzeug has already parsed the multipart body and invoked the custom stream factory.
  • ReceiveModeRequest.__init__() treats every POST /upload or POST /upload-ajax as an upload request and creates a receive directory regardless of disable_files (cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:369-391).
  • ReceiveModeRequest._get_file_stream() creates a writable ReceiveModeFile for each uploaded part without checking self.web.settings.get("receive", "disable_files") (cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:517-540).
  • ReceiveModeFile opens <receive_mode_dir>/<secure_filename>.part, writes attacker-controlled bytes, then renames the .part file to the final filename (cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:272-285, cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:320-346).

False-positive screening performed:

  • secure_filename() is used at cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:111-113 and cli/onionshare_cli/web/receive_mode.py:527-528, so the confirmed issue is not path traversal; the file is written under the configured receive data directory.
  • The UI hiding the file input is bypassable by direct multipart POST.
  • Route-level if not disable_files only affects later accounting/status/webhook behavior; it does not prevent the stream sink from creating and writing the file.
  • Default non-public onion services require the sender to know the onion address and private key unless the user opts into public mode. This limits exposure but does not enforce the user-selected "text only" security policy for authorized senders or public contact-form deployments.
  • A control case with disable_text=True showed submitted text was not written as a message file, demonstrating the harness was exercising the settings boundary.

Affected versions / patched versions:

  • Affected versions: unknown; confirmed in version 2.6.3 at commit 8cc75e1d7e88bd31f7276733449d412bf71c8999. Earlier versions were not tested during this audit.
  • Patched versions: 2.6.4

Severity:

Rationale: AV:N because the Receive endpoint is reached over the OnionShare HTTP service; AC:L because a crafted multipart POST is straightforward once the service is reachable; PR:L because the sender generally needs the OnionShare URL/private key unless the receiver intentionally runs public mode; UI:N because no further receiver interaction is required after service startup; S:U because the same local application writes the file; C:N because this PoC does not read data; I:L because the attacker writes unwanted files in a mode configured to reject files; A:L because the bypass can consume disk/storage despite the files-disabled policy, bounded by available disk and operator controls.

PoC

The following safe local proof uses only temporary directories and Flask's local test client. In this audit environment, several runtime dependencies were absent (waitress, flask_compress, flask_socketio, unidecode, stem, qrcode), so the harness stubbed those imports while executing the real receive_mode request parsing and file writing code. No external network traffic was sent and no real files outside temporary directories were modified.

Maintainer reproduction from a clean checkout with normal dependencies can omit the import stubs and run the same test-client setup, or can start a local Receive service with --disable-files and submit a multipart request to /upload-ajax.

Positive setup and trigger:

import os, tempfile, shutil
from io import BytesIO
from onionshare_cli.common import Common
from onionshare_cli.settings import Settings
from onionshare_cli.mode_settings import ModeSettings
from onionshare_cli.web import Web

base = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix='os-disable-files-poc-')
data_dir = os.path.join(base, 'receive-data')
os.mkdir(data_dir)

common = Common()
common.settings = Settings(common)
mode_settings = ModeSettings(common)
web = Web(common, False, mode_settings, 'receive')
web.app.testing = True
web.proxies = None
web.settings.set('receive', 'data_dir', data_dir)
web.settings.set('receive', 'disable_files', True)

with web.app.test_client() as c:
    res = c.post(
        '/upload-ajax',
        buffered=True,
        content_type='multipart/form-data',
        data={'file[]': (BytesIO(b'DISABLE_FILES_BYPASS_MARKER'), 'audit.txt')},
    )
    print(res.status_code)
    print(res.get_data(as_text=True))
    for root, dirs, files in os.walk(data_dir):
        for name in files:
            path = os.path.join(root, name)
            print(os.path.relpath(path, data_dir), open(path, 'rb').read().decode())

shutil.rmtree(base)

Observed output from this environment after re-running the proof after drafting:

May 29, 06:13PM: Upload of total size 274.0 B is starting
=> 27.0 B audit.txt          positive_status: 200
positive_response: {"info_flashes": ["Nothing submitted or message was too long (> 524288 characters)"]}
positive_written: [('2026-05-29/181347904165/audit.txt', 'DISABLE_FILES_BYPASS_MARKER')]

The response says nothing/fileless was submitted, but the audit.txt file was created under the Receive data directory.

Negative/control case:

web2.settings.set('receive', 'disable_text', True)
# POST only a text field to /upload-ajax

Observed control output:

control_status: 200
control_response: {"info_flashes": ["Nothing submitted"]}
control_written_files: []
cleanup_done: true

Cleanup:

  • The PoC deletes all temporary directories with shutil.rmtree(...); the audit run printed cleanup_done: true.

Suggested remediation

Enforce disable_files before any multipart file stream is written, not only in the route handler or template:

  • In ReceiveModeRequest._get_file_stream(), if self.web.settings.get("receive", "disable_files") is true, reject the file part before creating ReceiveModeFile, or route it to a discard stream and mark the request as rejected.
  • Ensure /upload and /upload-ajax return an explicit error when files are submitted while files are disabled.
  • Avoid creating a receive subdirectory for a file-only request that is rejected by policy.
  • Add regression tests for both /upload and /upload-ajax proving no file appears under receive.data_dir when receive.disable_files is true.
  • Add a control regression test proving disable_text still prevents message-file creation.

Impact

A Receive service operator can configure OnionShare as a text-only submission endpoint (for example, an anonymous contact form) and still receive attacker-controlled files on disk. This bypasses the explicit user-selected restriction and can lead to unwanted file placement and disk consumption in a deployment where file uploads were intentionally disabled.

The response and GUI/history accounting can be misleading because the route skips file processing while the lower-level request stream has already written the file. This may delay detection by the operator.

The confirmed issue does not provide arbitrary path traversal because filenames are sanitized and writes occur under the configured Receive data directory.

The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.

CVE-2026-54707 has a CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.6.4); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

onionshare-cli (< 2.6.4)

Security releases

onionshare-cli → 2.6.4 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade onionshare-cli to 2.6.4 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-54707? CVE-2026-54707 is a medium-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in onionshare-cli (pip), affecting versions < 2.6.4. It is fixed in 2.6.4. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-54707? CVE-2026-54707 has a CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of onionshare-cli are affected by CVE-2026-54707? onionshare-cli (pip) versions < 2.6.4 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-54707? Yes. CVE-2026-54707 is fixed in 2.6.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-54707 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-54707 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-54707 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-54707? Upgrade onionshare-cli to 2.6.4 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in onionshare-cli

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.