Summary
Langflow: IDOR Vulnerability in /api/v1/responses Endpoint Allows Authenticated Attackers to Access Another User's Flow
Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in /api/v1/responses endpoint allows an authenticated attacker to execute any flow belonging to another user by specifying the victim's flow ID in the request.
Details
The vulnerability exists in the get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name helper function in src/backend/base/langflow/helpers/flow.py (lines 399-414).
When a flow is accessed via UUID (flow_id), the function queries the database directly without verifying if the authenticated user owns that flow:
# src/backend/base/langflow/helpers/flow.py:399-414
async def get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name(flow_id_or_name: str, user_id: str | UUID | None = None) -> FlowRead:
async with session_scope() as session:
try:
flow_id = UUID(flow_id_or_name)
# When using UUID, query directly WITHOUT checking user_id
flow = await session.get(Flow, flow_id) # ❌ No user_id check!
except ValueError:
endpoint_name = flow_id_or_name
stmt = select(Flow).where(Flow.endpoint_name == endpoint_name)
# Only when using endpoint_name is user_id checked
if user_id:
stmt = stmt.where(Flow.user_id == uuid_user_id)
This function is used by the /api/v1/responses endpoint (defined in src/backend/base/langflow/api/v1/openai_responses.py:589).
PoC (Proof of Concept)
# Attacker (user A) with API_KEY_A tries to execute victim (user B)'s flow
curl -X POST "http://localhost:7860/api/v1/responses" \
-H "x-api-key: sk-ATTACKER_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "VICTIM_FLOW_ID",
"input_value": "test",
"stream": false
}'
# Returns 200 and executes the victim's flow
Fixes
Fixed in PR #12832 (fix(security): close IDOR in get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name), merged 2026-04-22, released in Langflow 1.9.1.
The helper normalizes user_id once and enforces ownership on both lookup branches (UUID and endpoint_name):
flow_id = UUID(flow_id_or_name)
flow = await session.get(Flow, flow_id)
if flow is not None and uuid_user_id is not None and flow.user_id != uuid_user_id:
flow = None # cross-user lookup falls through to the shared 404
Key points:
- Cross-user lookups return 404 (not 403), so flow existence is not disclosed via a 403-vs-404 oracle.
/api/v1/responsesand/api/v2/workflowpassuser_idexplicitly, so fixing the helper closes them directly; the/api/v1/run*routes were additionally moved from a bareDepends(get_flow_by_id_or_endpoint_name)to auth-aware wrapper dependencies (defense in depth).- A malformed
user_idnow fails closed (404 instead of a raw 500). - Webhook routes intentionally keep the unscoped lookup (public by design / explicit ownership check elsewhere).
- Regression tests cover the cross-user UUID case and reproduce the original PoC against
/api/v1/responses.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to the security researchers who responsibly disclosed this vulnerability:
- @yzeirnials
- @johnatzeropath
- @LeftenantZero
- @Zwique
Impact
Any authenticated user can:
- Execute any flow in the system by knowing its flow ID
- Access potentially sensitive data processed by victim's flows
- Consume victim's resources
CVE-2026-55255 has a CVSS score of 8.4 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.9.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-55255? CVE-2026-55255 is a high-severity security vulnerability in langflow (pip), affecting versions < 1.9.1. It is fixed in 1.9.1.
- How severe is CVE-2026-55255? CVE-2026-55255 has a CVSS score of 8.4 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of langflow are affected by CVE-2026-55255? langflow (pip) versions < 1.9.1 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-55255? Yes. CVE-2026-55255 is fixed in 1.9.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-55255 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-55255 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-55255 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-55255? Upgrade
langflowto 1.9.1 or later.