Summary
Identrail Cross-tenant IDOR: Client-supplied GitHub App installation_id is bound to the caller's workspace without ownership verification
identrail's GitHub App connection-completion endpoint binds a fully client-supplied installation_id to the caller's workspace without verifying that the installation belongs to, or was installed by, the workspace that initiated the connect flow. identrail then mints a GitHub App installation access token for the supplied installation_id using the app's own JWT, so an authenticated tenant can link any other identrail customer's GitHub App installation into their own workspace and read that victim organization's private repositories.
Affected code (default-on path, no feature flag)
- Route:
internal/api/router.go:3590,POST /v1/workspaces/:workspace_id/projects/:project_id/github/connect/complete.installation_idis read from the JSON body or the attacker-controlledX-GitHub-Installation-IDheader (router.go:3582-3588). - Service:
internal/api/github_connect.go:781CompleteGitHubConnection. Thestatetoken IS rigorously bound to the caller's scope (github_connect.go:818:if stateRecord.TenantID != scope.TenantID || stateRecord.WorkspaceID != project.WorkspaceID || stateRecord.ProjectID != project.ProjectID { ... }), but the only check oninstallation_idisrequest.InstallationID <= 0(:794). The raw client value is persisted as the workspace's connection (:840). - Cross-tenant read primitive:
internal/connectors/github/repositories.go:39ListInstallationRepositories→internal/connectors/github/app.go:170mints a token viaPOST /app/installations/{installationId}/access_tokenssigned with the App JWT, succeeding for any installation where identrail's app is installed.
The feature-flagged V2 path CompleteGitHubConnector (github_connect.go:447, default off) shares the gap and is additionally weaker (matches pending connector by state value alone with no caller-scope re-check); a single fix should cover both.
Intent proof
The code binds state to {TenantID, WorkspaceID, ProjectID} and re-verifies it at completion (:818), demonstrating it understands binding is required. The asymmetry, state bound, installation_id unbound, is the missed check.
Exploitation
- Attacker is any authenticated identrail tenant; they call
StartGitHubConnectionfor their own workspace and receive astate. - Attacker calls the completion route with
{state: <their state>, installation_id: V}where V is a victim org's identrail GitHub App installation id (installation ids are not secret, they appear in post-install redirect URLs, webhook payloads, the org's GitHub App settings, and are enumerable integers). CompleteGitHubConnectionaccepts (state matches attacker scope),ListInstallationRepositories(V)mints a token for V and lists the victim org's private repos, and the connection is persisted under the attacker's workspace.- Attacker now reads the victim org's private repository inventory and can drive posture scans/repo reads via their own workspace.
Impact: cross-tenant disclosure of another customer organization's private GitHub repositories and metadata.
Impact
The application does not perform an authorization check before performing a sensitive operation. Typical impact: unauthorized access to restricted functionality or data.
CVE-2026-59185 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.0.2); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Bind installation_id with the same rigor as state: capture it from GitHub's signed post-install redirect (setup_url/callback_url) and pin it to the pending state at start time, and/or after minting verify the installation's account matches the org the initiating workspace is authorized for.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-59185? CVE-2026-59185 is a high-severity missing authorization vulnerability in github.com/identrail/identrail (go), affecting versions < 1.0.2. It is fixed in 1.0.2. The application does not perform an authorization check before performing a sensitive operation.
- How severe is CVE-2026-59185? CVE-2026-59185 has a CVSS score of 8.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/identrail/identrail are affected by CVE-2026-59185? github.com/identrail/identrail (go) versions < 1.0.2 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-59185? Yes. CVE-2026-59185 is fixed in 1.0.2. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-59185 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-59185 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-59185 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-59185? Upgrade
github.com/identrail/identrailto 1.0.2 or later.