CVE-2026-59925

CVE-2026-59925 is a high-severity inefficient regular expression (ReDoS) vulnerability in mistune (pip), affecting versions < 3.3.0. It is fixed in 3.3.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Mistune inline_parser: quadratic-time parsing on long runs of x and x emphasis pairs

Type: Algorithmic-complexity DoS in core emphasis parsing. A long sequence of well-formed **x** (strong) or ***x*** (strong-emphasis combined) pairs causes O(N²) parser work. Distinct from the bracket-bomb DoS ([ repetition) and from the formatting-plugin DoS (~~/==/^^); this one fires on default-config mistune with no plugins required.
File: src/mistune/inline_parser.py lines 41-48 (the EMPHASIS_END_RE family) and the surrounding emphasis dispatch.
Root cause: for every opening run of *s the parser scans forward using one of EMPHASIS_END_RE['*'] / ['**'] / ['***'] to find the matching close. Each scan is bounded per call, but the parser invokes the scan from every potential start position. For input shaped **x** repeated N times, every ** is treated as a potential start, each scan can cover up to the end of input. Total work is O(N²). The triple-emphasis variant ***x*** is slightly worse due to the extra alternation between *, **, and *** close patterns. Reproducible against default mistune with no plugins.

Affected Code

File: src/mistune/inline_parser.py, lines 41-48.

EMPHASIS_END_RE = {
    "*": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*(?!\*)"),
    "_": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])_(?!_)\b"),
    "**": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*\*(?!\*)"),
    "__": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])__(?!_)\b"),
    "***": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\\*|[^\s*])\*\*\*(?!\*)"),
    "___": re.compile(r"(?:" + PREVENT_BACKSLASH + r"\\_|[^\s_])___(?!_)\b"),
}
# Each of the six end-patterns is invoked from every emphasis open position
# fired by the inline rule `r"\*{1,3}(?=[^\s*])|\b_{1,3}(?=[^\s_])"`. The
# scan itself is bounded per call; the cost comes from the parser invoking
# the scan at every matching open marker, giving O(N²) total work.

Why it's wrong: same shape as the formatting-plugin and bracket-bomb DoS findings. The CommonMark reference parser handles emphasis in linear time using a delimiter-stack algorithm (commonmark.js, commonmark-py, markdown-it-py all do this). mistune retries the close-scan from each open marker. The bounded regex is not enough; the surrounding loop is the source of the quadratic.

Exploit Chain

  1. Application uses mistune to render user-supplied markdown. No plugins required, affects the default mistune.create_markdown() configuration.
  2. Attacker submits a 40 KB payload of **x** repeated 8000 times.
  3. Server CPU pegs for ~4 seconds; 16 KB → ~17 seconds. Doubling input quadruples time.
  4. Repeating the request floods the worker pool.

Security Impact

Severity: sec-high. Network-reachable, no authentication, no plugin requirement. Default mistune is vulnerable.
Attacker capability: O(N²) CPU cost from a single small input. Predictable scaling, easy to combine with concurrent requests for service denial.
Preconditions: application uses mistune.create_markdown() (default config) on attacker-supplied markdown. No plugins required.
Differential: PoC-verified against [email protected], default config:

import mistune, time
md = mistune.create_markdown()                     # no plugins
for n in [500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000]:
    s = '**x**' * n
    t = time.time()
    md(s)
    print(f'  **x** * {n} ({len(s)}b): {(time.time() - t) * 1000:.0f}ms')

# Output (Python 3.13, Linux, 2.5GHz CPU):
#   **x** *  500  (2500b):    20ms
#   **x** * 1000  (5000b):    74ms
#   **x** * 2000 (10000b):   284ms
#   **x** * 4000 (20000b):  1079ms
#   **x** * 8000 (40000b):  4309ms

# Triple-emphasis is similar:
md('***x***' * 4000)   # ~1500ms

# Linear in N for non-emphasis input of comparable size:
md('xxxxx' * 8000)     # 1ms (4000x faster)

The patched build (with the suggested fix below, delimiter-stack rewrite or hard cap on simultaneous open markers) keeps the time linear in N.

Impact

A regular expression with worst-case exponential or polynomial matching time is applied to untrusted input, causing excessive CPU use. Typical impact: denial of service when input is crafted to trigger backtracking.

CVE-2026-59925 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.3.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

mistune (< 3.3.0)

Security releases

mistune → 3.3.0 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Cap the number of unmatched opening emphasis markers the parser will track simultaneously, treating the rest as literal text:

--- a/src/mistune/inline_parser.py
+++ b/src/mistune/inline_parser.py
@@ ... in the emphasis-handling code path
+    # Bound the number of open emphasis markers tracked. CommonMark gives
+    # no semantics to deeply nested unmatched emphasis; this cap turns the
+    # parser-level O(N^2) into O(N) for adversarial inputs while preserving
+    # behaviour on every realistic markdown document.
+    MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS = 100
+    if open_emphasis_count > MAX_OPEN_EMPHASIS:
+        # treat remaining * / _ as literal text
+        ...

The proper fix is a delimiter-stack pass, the same approach the formatting-plugin advisory and the bracket-bomb advisory recommend. All three DoS findings share the same algorithmic pattern; a single rewrite of the inline-token retry loop closes them together. Add a regression test asserting that md('**x**' * 50_000) completes in under 1 second.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-59925? CVE-2026-59925 is a high-severity inefficient regular expression (ReDoS) vulnerability in mistune (pip), affecting versions < 3.3.0. It is fixed in 3.3.0. A regular expression with worst-case exponential or polynomial matching time is applied to untrusted input, causing excessive CPU use.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-59925? CVE-2026-59925 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of mistune are affected by CVE-2026-59925? mistune (pip) versions < 3.3.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-59925? Yes. CVE-2026-59925 is fixed in 3.3.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-59925 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-59925 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-59925 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-59925? Upgrade mistune to 3.3.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in mistune

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.