CVE-2026-61799

CVE-2026-61799 is a medium-severity integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp (maven), affecting versions <= 0.0.22.Final. It is fixed in 0.0.23.Final.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

netty-incubator-codec-ohttp: Binary HTTP parser unchecked varint length overflow causes decoder crash

io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp uses attacker-controlled Binary HTTP variable-length integers as long values but accumulates them into int offsets. Large valid varint lengths wrap the internal offset negative, leading to unchecked ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException / IndexOutOfBoundsException from a tiny malformed BHTTP payload. A remote peer can trigger connection-level denial of service in applications that expose BinaryHttpParser / BinaryHttpDecoder to untrusted input.

Details

In codec-bhttp/src/main/java/io/netty/incubator/codec/bhttp/BinaryHttpParser.java, several parser paths store cumulative byte offsets in int sumBytes and then add attacker-controlled long lengths using compound assignment. In Java, int += long narrows the result back to int, so a length such as 2^31 wraps sumBytes negative.

Primary request-control-data path:

  • readRequestHead(...) declares int sumBytes = 0 at BinaryHttpParser.java:386.
  • It reads methodLength as a long at BinaryHttpParser.java:394.
  • It performs sumBytes += methodLength at BinaryHttpParser.java:395, narrowing the result to int.
  • If methodLength is 2^31, sumBytes wraps negative and bypasses if (sumBytes >= in.readableBytes()) return null at BinaryHttpParser.java:396-398.
  • The parser then computes schemeLengthIdx = in.readerIndex() + sumBytes and calls in.getByte(schemeLengthIdx) at BinaryHttpParser.java:401-402, producing a negative index exception.

The same pattern is present in header parsing:

  • readFieldLine(...) uses int sumBytes and adds long nameLength / long valueLength at BinaryHttpParser.java:659-680.
  • valueLengthIdx = nameIdx + (int) nameLength at BinaryHttpParser.java:674 can also overflow.

getIndeterminateLength(...) similarly uses int sumBytes and long possibleTerminator at BinaryHttpParser.java:544-553.

Proof of concept

Safe local verification performed in this repository. After compiling codec-bhttp, the following minimal verifier uses a 15-byte payload:

import io.netty.buffer.ByteBuf;
import io.netty.buffer.Unpooled;
import io.netty.incubator.codec.bhttp.BinaryHttpParser;

public final class VerifyBhttpOverflow {
  public static void main(String[] args) {
    byte[] payload = new byte[] {
      0x00, (byte)0xc0, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, (byte)0x80, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
      0x47, 0x45, 0x54, 0x58, 0x58, 0x58
    };
    ByteBuf input = Unpooled.wrappedBuffer(payload);
    try {
      new BinaryHttpParser(8192).parse(input, false);
      System.out.println("returned");
    } catch (Throwable t) {
      System.out.println(t.getClass().getName());
      System.out.println(t.getMessage());
    }
  }
}

Payload interpretation:

  • 00: known-length request frame indicator.
  • c000000080000000: valid 8-byte varint encoding of 0x80000000 (2^31) as the method length.
  • 474554585858: a few dummy bytes so the parser proceeds far enough to compute the next index.

Observed result:

java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException
Index -2147483639 out of bounds for length 15

The parser should reject the malformed/incomplete message with a controlled decoder exception or return null awaiting more bytes; it should not allow integer wraparound to reach unchecked buffer indexing.

Suggested remediation

  • Use long for all cumulative byte counts derived from protocol lengths.
  • Before converting any protocol length to int, verify it is non-negative, no larger than Integer.MAX_VALUE, and no larger than available readable bytes and configured limits.
  • Replace sumBytes >= in.readableBytes() checks with precise checked arithmetic that permits exact-boundary complete fields but rejects impossible lengths.
  • Throw a controlled CorruptedFrameException / TooLongFrameException for invalid or unsupported lengths.
  • Add regression tests for 8-byte varint lengths at and above Integer.MAX_VALUE in request control data, response control data, known and indeterminate field sections, and field lines.

References

  • codec-bhttp/src/main/java/io/netty/incubator/codec/bhttp/BinaryHttpParser.java:386-402
  • codec-bhttp/src/main/java/io/netty/incubator/codec/bhttp/BinaryHttpParser.java:659-680
  • codec-bhttp/src/main/java/io/netty/incubator/codec/bhttp/BinaryHttpParser.java:544-553
  • RFC 9292: Binary Representation of HTTP Messages
  • RFC 9000 variable-length integer encoding

Impact

A remote peer can trigger an unchecked exception in the Binary HTTP decoder using a tiny payload. In typical Netty pipelines this closes or fails the affected channel. Depending on application-level exception handling, repeated payloads can cause sustained denial of service for exposed BHTTP endpoints. No memory corruption or information disclosure was observed because the failure occurs in Java/Netty bounds checks.

An arithmetic operation produces a value that exceeds the integer type's maximum, causing it to wrap to an unexpected small value. Typical impact: incorrect size calculations leading to heap overflows or logic errors.

CVE-2026-61799 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.0.23.Final); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp (<= 0.0.22.Final)

Security releases

io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp → 0.0.23.Final (maven)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp to 0.0.23.Final or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-61799? CVE-2026-61799 is a medium-severity integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp (maven), affecting versions <= 0.0.22.Final. It is fixed in 0.0.23.Final. An arithmetic operation produces a value that exceeds the integer type's maximum, causing it to wrap to an unexpected small value.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-61799? CVE-2026-61799 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp are affected by CVE-2026-61799? io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp (maven) versions <= 0.0.22.Final is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-61799? Yes. CVE-2026-61799 is fixed in 0.0.23.Final. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-61799 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-61799 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-61799 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-61799? Upgrade io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp to 0.0.23.Final or later.

Other vulnerabilities in io.netty.incubator:netty-incubator-codec-bhttp

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.