CVE-2026-62324

CVE-2026-62324 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jodit (npm), affecting versions <= 4.12.30. It is fixed in 4.12.31.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Jodit has incomplete javascript: scheme normalization in sanitizeHTMLElement href check that allows link XSS

jodit's sanitizeHTMLElement neutralizes a javascript: href using a bare href.trim().indexOf('javascript') === 0 check. This omits the normalization jodit applies to every other URL attribute: isDangerousUrl strips control bytes with value.replace(/[\u0000-\u0020]+/g, '') and lowercases the value before testing the scheme. Because the href check does neither, it is bypassed by three obfuscation classes, all confirmed firing on click against the shipped 4.12.30 build:

  1. Case variants: JAVASCRIPT:, Javascript:, jaVaScRiPt: (the check is case-sensitive).
  2. A leading C0 control byte, e.g. a \x01 prefix before lowercase javascript: (trim() does not remove bytes in the \x00-\x08 / \x0e-\x1f range, but the browser strips a leading control byte before resolving the scheme).
  3. An embedded tab or newline inside the scheme, e.g. java\tscript: or java\nscript: (the browser strips tab/newline from a URL, but indexOf('javascript') sees the broken word and does not match).

The dangerous href survives editor.value = assignment and the on-change LazyWalker, persisting in the stored editor value. A victim who clicks the link in any consumer that renders the stored value (readonly editor, server-rendered page, innerHTML consumer) runs attacker-controlled JS in that page's origin.

Details

The check is in sanitizeHTMLElement at src/core/helpers/html/safe-html.ts:213:

if (safeJavaScriptLink && href && href.trim().indexOf('javascript') === 0) {
    attr(elm, 'href', location.protocol + '//' + href);
    effected = true;
}

href.trim() removes leading/trailing ASCII whitespace only, and indexOf('javascript') is case-sensitive and literal. So the check fails to fire whenever the scheme is upper/mixed-case, prefixed by a non-whitespace control byte, or split by an embedded tab/newline - all of which a browser still resolves to javascript: on click (URI schemes are case-insensitive per RFC 3986 section 3.1; leading control bytes, tabs and newlines are stripped from a URL during parsing).

The same file already contains the correct routine, isDangerousUrl() (line 176), used for every other URL attribute (src, data, action, formaction, poster, background, xlink:href):

function isDangerousUrl(value, tagName) {
    const normalized = value.replace(/[\u0000-\u0020]+/g, '').toLowerCase();
    if (/^(?:javascript|vbscript|livescript|mocha):/.test(normalized)) {
        return true;
    }
    // ...
}

isDangerousUrl strips every control byte and ASCII space (/[\u0000-\u0020]+/g) and lowercases before testing the scheme, so it resists all three obfuscations. But href never goes through it: the attribute list isDangerousUrl is applied to (URL_ATTRIBUTES) is commented "besides href", and href is handled only by the weaker indexOf check. Both the synchronous value-set path (onBeforeSetNativeEditorValue -> safeHTML -> sanitizeHTMLElement) and the asynchronous on-change path (sanitizeAttributes -> sanitizeHTMLElement) use that same weak check.

Positive controls (filter is otherwise live): a plain lowercase javascript: href IS neutralized: jodit rewrites the value to location.protocol + '//' + href, so it reads about://javascript:... on an about:blank test page and https://javascript:... on an https page. A leading ASCII space or tab IS caught by trim(); the bypass is specific to the un-normalized forms above.

Proof of concept

Default configuration. Assign a payload to the editor and read back the stored value:

const editor = Jodit.make('#editor');
editor.value = '<a href="JAVASCRIPT:alert(document.domain)">click me</a>';
// editor.value getter returns the href unchanged:
//   <p><a href="JAVASCRIPT:alert(document.domain)">click me</a></p>
document.getElementById('view').innerHTML = editor.value;
// Clicking "click me" runs alert(document.domain) in the consumer's origin.

The same persists for the leading-control-byte form (a \x01 prefix before lowercase javascript:) and the embedded-tab/newline forms (java\tscript: / java\nscript:). Verified live on the shipped es2021/jodit.min.js for jodit 4.12.30. Positive controls in the same run: <img src=x onerror=...> stripped; lowercase javascript: neutralized to location.protocol + '//' + href (about://... on the about:blank test page used here, https://... on an https page).

Impact

Stored click-XSS. An attacker with write access to an editor instance (content author, or comment author in a multi-user application) stores a crafted javascript: link. Any user who clicks it in a view that renders the stored value (readonly editor, server-rendered page, innerHTML consumer) runs attacker-controlled JS in that origin. One user interaction (the click) is required. A consumer that re-sanitizes the editor output before rendering is not affected.

Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session. Typical impact: session or credential theft, and actions taken as the user.

CVE-2026-62324 has a CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.12.31); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

jodit (<= 4.12.30)

Security releases

jodit → 4.12.31 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Route href through the existing isDangerousUrl() rather than the bespoke indexOf check. isDangerousUrl already strips control bytes and lowercases, so it closes the case, control-byte, and embedded-whitespace bypasses at once:

-	if (safeJavaScriptLink && href && href.trim().indexOf('javascript') === 0) {
+	if (safeJavaScriptLink && href && isDangerousUrl(href, elm.nodeName.toLowerCase())) {
 		attr(elm, 'href', location.protocol + '//' + href);
 		effected = true;
 	}

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-62324? CVE-2026-62324 is a medium-severity cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in jodit (npm), affecting versions <= 4.12.30. It is fixed in 4.12.31. Untrusted input is rendered as active markup in a victim's browser, which can run script in their session.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-62324? CVE-2026-62324 has a CVSS score of 5.4 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of jodit are affected by CVE-2026-62324? jodit (npm) versions <= 4.12.30 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-62324? Yes. CVE-2026-62324 is fixed in 4.12.31. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-62324 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-62324 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-62324 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-62324? Upgrade jodit to 4.12.31 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in jodit

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.