CVE-2026-63335

CVE-2026-63335 is a medium-severity improper input validation vulnerability in com.rabbitmq:amqp-client (maven), affecting versions <= 5.30.0. It is fixed in 5.31.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

RabbitMQ Java client malformed body frame triggers raw command assembler exception

RabbitMQ Java Client's inbound AMQP command assembly accepts a content header declaring a small body and then processes a larger body frame by throwing a raw UnsupportedOperationException from CommandAssembler. A broker peer that the client has connected to can use this malformed frame sequence to fail frame processing and tear down the client connection instead of receiving a clean protocol-level malformed-frame error.

This was discovered based on an existing vulnerability CVE-2017-15699.

Details

Inbound frames enter the client through SocketFrameHandler.readFrame, which returns frames parsed from the peer-controlled input stream (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/SocketFrameHandler.java:197). AMQConnection.MainLoop reads each frame (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:692) and dispatches non-zero-channel frames to the channel while the connection is open (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:748 and src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:766). The channel then passes the frame to the current command assembler through AMQChannel.handleFrame and AMQCommand.handleFrame (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQChannel.java:121, src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQCommand.java:114). When a content-bearing method is followed by a content header, CommandAssembler.consumeHeaderFrame records the header's declared body size in remainingBodyBytes after only checking it against the configured maximum (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:126 through src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:139). The body-frame path subtracts the received payload length from that remaining count before validating that the payload fits (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:145 through src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:149), so a body frame larger than the declared size drives the count negative and reaches the raw UnsupportedOperationException at src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:150 and src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/CommandAssembler.java:151. AMQConnection catches the resulting throwable in frame processing and performs connection failure handling and final shutdown (src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:695 through src/main/java/com/rabbitmq/client/impl/AMQConnection.java:705).

PoC

poc.zip

bash ./poc/run.sh
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: %%%%%% FIXME unimplemented

The UnsupportedOperationException: %%%%%% FIXME unimplemented fingerprint is the raw exception thrown at the negative remainingBodyBytes check in CommandAssembler.consumeBodyFrame. This line shows the malformed declared-size/body-size sequence reached the vulnerable assembler path.

Impact

The attacker model is a remote AMQP broker peer that the RabbitMQ Java Client application has accepted, including a malicious broker endpoint, a compromised broker, or routing that sends the client to an attacker-controlled peer. The peer needs a non-zero open channel that can receive a content-bearing server-to-client method such as basic.deliver, then sends the method frame, a content header declaring a body below the configured maximum, and a body frame whose payload exceeds that declared size. Under those conditions, the peer can force frame processing to fail with UnsupportedOperationException and close the AMQP connection, producing a client-side denial of service for work depending on that connection; the finding does not indicate memory corruption, data disclosure, or code execution.

The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths. Typical impact: varies by context: data corruption, logic bypass, or denial of service.

Affected versions

com.rabbitmq:amqp-client (<= 5.30.0)

Security releases

com.rabbitmq:amqp-client → 5.31.0 (maven)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade com.rabbitmq:amqp-client to 5.31.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-63335? CVE-2026-63335 is a medium-severity improper input validation vulnerability in com.rabbitmq:amqp-client (maven), affecting versions <= 5.30.0. It is fixed in 5.31.0. The application does not adequately validate input before processing it, allowing unexpected values to reach sensitive code paths.
  2. Which versions of com.rabbitmq:amqp-client are affected by CVE-2026-63335? com.rabbitmq:amqp-client (maven) versions <= 5.30.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-63335? Yes. CVE-2026-63335 is fixed in 5.31.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-63335 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-63335 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-63335 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-63335? Upgrade com.rabbitmq:amqp-client to 5.31.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in com.rabbitmq:amqp-client

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.