Summary
Http4s Ember accepts Transfer-Encoding combined with Content-Length (CL.TE request smuggling)
Ember's HTTP/1.1 request parser does not reject a message that carries both aTransfer-Encoding and a Content-Length header. RFC 9112 §6.1 requires a
server to treat such a message as a framing error and close the connection.
An intermediary that follows the RFC's CL-strip-and-forward path (or that
prioritises Content-Length) will frame the body differently from Ember,
enabling HTTP request smuggling (CL.TE).
Server
Request smuggling when ember-server is an origin behind an intermediary that
forwards both headers over a keep-alive backend connection and frames byContent-Length while Ember frames by chunked:
- Front-end security bypass: the smuggled request reaches paths the
intermediary's ACL/auth layer would have blocked, with attacker-chosen
method and headers. - Cross-user request hijack: a dangling smuggled prefix concatenates with the
next victim's request on the shared backend socket, capturing its headers. - Cache poisoning: the smuggled response is associated with the next request
key in a caching proxy.
Client
ember-client shares the same parser on the response path. An upstream that
sends both headers can desync a pooled client connection. This requires a
malicious or compromised upstream.
Preconditions
- Unauthenticated remote attacker (server)
- ember-server as origin behind a keep-alive intermediary
- Intermediary forwards a request carrying both
Transfer-EncodingandContent-Length(RFC says it MAY reject; many forward) and frames byContent-Length - Malicious or compromised upstream (client)
Workarounds
- Intermediary strictly rejects requests carrying both
Transfer-Encoding
andContent-Length - Intermediary buffers and re-encodes request bodies
- Disable backend keep-alive between the intermediary and Ember
Impact
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.12 to 0.23.35 or later; org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13 to 0.23.35 or later; org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3 to 0.23.35 or later; org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13 to 1.0.0-M47 or later; org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3 to 1.0.0-M47 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-69204? CVE-2026-69204 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.12 (maven), affecting versions <= 0.23.34. It is fixed in 0.23.35, 1.0.0-M47.
- Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-69204?
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.12(maven) (versions <= 0.23.34)org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13(maven) (versions <= 0.23.34)org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3(maven) (versions <= 0.23.34)
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-69204? Yes. CVE-2026-69204 is fixed in 0.23.35, 1.0.0-M47. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-69204 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-69204 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-69204 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-69204?
- Upgrade
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.12to 0.23.35 or later - Upgrade
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13to 0.23.35 or later - Upgrade
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3to 0.23.35 or later - Upgrade
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13to 1.0.0-M47 or later - Upgrade
org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3to 1.0.0-M47 or later
- Upgrade