Summary
Browserslist: Unbounded memory growth (no cache eviction) via distinct query results, leading to eventual OOM
Vulnerability Details
File: index.js
Location: cache (browserslist()'s result cache, line ~402) andparseCache (parseQueries()'s AST cache)
Root Cause
var cache = {}
var parseCache = {}
function browserslist(queries, opts) {
...
var cacheKey = JSON.stringify([queries, context])
if (cache[cacheKey]) return cache[cacheKey]
...
if (!env.env.BROWSERSLIST_DISABLE_CACHE) { cache[cacheKey] = result }
return result
}
function parseQueries(queries) {
var cacheKey = JSON.stringify(queries)
if (cacheKey in parseCache) return parseCache[cacheKey]
var result = parseWithoutCache(QUERIES, queries)
if (!env.env.BROWSERSLIST_DISABLE_CACHE) { parseCache[cacheKey] = result }
...
}
Every distinct (queries, context) pair is cached forever, no size cap,
TTL, or eviction. browserslist.clearCaches() never resets either object
(it only resets node.js's own filesystem caches); the only opt-out is theBROWSERSLIST_DISABLE_CACHE env var, controlled by the calling
application, not an attacker.
Some short, valid queries amplify this badly. The since <year>-<month>-<day>
query type (/^since (\d+)-(\d+)-(\d+)$/i) accepts any digit
combination, Date.UTC() normalizes rather than rejects out-of-range
values, giving an effectively unbounded space of ~17-byte distinct cache
keys, each of which resolves to (and caches) a result close to the full
~8.5 KB browser list for any sufficiently old year.
Measured Impact
20,000 distinct since <year>-<month>-<day> queries (~330 KB total input,--expose-gc before/after measurement to rule out uncollected garbage)
retained over 50 MB of heap permanently, roughly 150x
amplification, growing linearly with no cap observed up to 40,000 queries
(52.3 MB).
Attack Scenario
Any long-running process (server, daemon, warm CI worker) that callsbrowserslist() with a query value that varies across requests/items and is
influenced, even partially, by external input accumulates one cache entry
per distinct value ever seen. An attacker who can influence that value
across many requests (this is a volumetric attack, unlike the
single-request DoS findings from this same research pass) sends a stream of
cheap, distinct queries (e.g. since 1900-01-01, since 1900-01-02, ...)
until the process runs out of memory and crashes.
Recommended Fix (implemented and verified)
Replace both plain-object caches with Maps bounded to a fixed maximum
entry count, evicting the oldest entry once the cap is reached (Map
preserves insertion order, so .keys().next().value is always oldest):
var CACHE_MAX_ENTRIES = 500
function boundedCacheSet(map, key, value) {
if (map.size >= CACHE_MAX_ENTRIES) {
map.delete(map.keys().next().value)
}
map.set(key, value)
}
var cache = new Map()
var parseCache = new Map()
(read sites changed to .has()/.get(), write sites to boundedCacheSet())
Verification:
NODE_ENV=test npx uvu test .test.js→ 301/301 pass unmodified
(test/cache.test.jsexercisesclearCaches()/BROWSERSLIST_DISABLE_CACHE
againstnode.js's separate filesystem caches, unaffected here); confirmed
a repeated identical call still returns the cached reference.- Re-ran the memory PoC post-fix: heap stayed flat at ~4.9 MB after 5,000,
10,000, 20,000, and 40,000 distinctsince-date queries (was
10.5 → 16.5 → 28.4 → 52.3 MB pre-fix).
Verification Environment
browserslist @ HEAD (== v4.28.6, current latest stable release) under local
Node.js v20.19.5, run with --expose-gc for accurate heap measurement.
Note
Found during a broader review of this codebase in the same research pass
that produced GHSA-rrmg-cfrq-23vv (parse.js algorithmic complexity),
GHSA-g6p8-hj8g-x889 (baseline regexp ReDoS), GHSA-73wf-gq98-2v4g
(normalizeStats crash/prototype write), and GHSA-h633-868p-5rfw
(SCOPED_CONFIG__PATTERN ReDoS), all single-request DoS vectors. This one is
different in character (volumetric, not single-request) and is reported
separately/scored lower accordingly.
Impact
- Who is affected: Long-running processes calling
browserslist()with
query values that vary across requests/items and are influenced by
external input. - What an attacker achieves: DoS via eventual out-of-memory crash, given
sustained traffic over time (not a single small payload). - Conditions required: No authentication; requires volume rather than a
single request, hence Medium rather than High severity.
The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap. Typical impact: resource exhaustion leading to denial of service.
CVE-2026-73089 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.28.7); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-73089? CVE-2026-73089 is a high-severity allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in browserslist (npm), affecting versions <= 4.28.6. It is fixed in 4.28.7. The application allocates resources such as memory, threads, or file descriptors based on untrusted input without enforcing a cap.
- How severe is CVE-2026-73089? CVE-2026-73089 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of browserslist are affected by CVE-2026-73089? browserslist (npm) versions <= 4.28.6 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-73089? Yes. CVE-2026-73089 is fixed in 4.28.7. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-73089 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-73089 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-73089 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-73089? Upgrade
browserslistto 4.28.7 or later.