Summary
GitPython: clonefrom()/clone() omit --separate-git-dir from unsafegitcloneoptions, enabling arbitrary git-directory creation outside the destination
- CWE: CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) / CWE-22 (Path Traversal, in the "escapes intended base directory" sense)
- Affected component:
git/repo/base.py,Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options(class attribute, lines 153-165) andRepo._clone()(lines 1477-1520), reached via the publicRepo.clone_from()(line 1626) andRepo.clone()(line 1567) APIs. - Affected version: GitPython at HEAD (
9729ed3b948f2bde09f1f188c5311e172212b67e, 2026-08-05, VERSION3.1.58)
Reachability
Repo.clone_from(url, to_path, **kwargs) (and Repo.clone()) forward arbitrary keyword arguments to the underlying git clone invocation. Before forwarding, GitPython builds a candidate option list from the kwargs (Git._option_candidates) and checks it against a denylist, Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, via Git.check_unsafe_options(), unless the caller passes allow_unsafe_options=True. This denylist mechanism is exactly the guard that the last ~16 published GHSAs against this repo (2026-07-12 → 2026-08-05) have repeatedly found incomplete or bypassable for other options (--template, --upload-pack, --config, --exec, --output, --index-output, --pathspec-from-file, etc.).
git clone also accepts --separate-git-dir=<path>, which redirects the repository's entire .git metadata directory to an arbitrary, caller-controlled filesystem path, leaving only a gitlink text file (gitdir: <path>) at the intended destination. This is the exact same primitive already recognized as unsafe by GitPython's own code: Repo.unsafe_git_init_options (line 145-150) blocks --separate-git-dir for Repo.init(), with the comment "Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path". The Repo._clone()/clone()/clone_from() docstring (line 1450-1452) is even more explicit:
:param allow_unsafe_options:
Allow unsafe options to be used, such as ``--template`` and
``--separate-git-dir``.
i.e. the maintainers' own documentation states that allow_unsafe_options=False (the default) is supposed to block --separate-git-dir for clone. But Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options does not contain it:
unsafe_git_clone_options = [
"--upload-pack",
"-u",
"--config",
"-c",
"--template",
"--bundle-uri",
]
So any application that forwards a separate_git_dir (or separate-git-dir) kwarg into Repo.clone_from() / Repo.clone(), e.g. a CI/build service, a Git-hosting proxy, or any tool that exposes a subset of clone options to a client, the exact threat model already accepted for the sibling --template/--upload-pack/--config entries in this same list, gets no protection at all for --separate-git-dir, even with the default allow_unsafe_options=False.
Root cause
Parity gap between two sibling denylists that guard the same underlying primitive (arbitrary redirection of git metadata storage): unsafe_git_init_options correctly lists --separate-git-dir; unsafe_git_clone_options, covering the same option on a different git subcommand that also accepts it, does not, despite the function's own docstring claiming otherwise. This is the same "denylist omits an equally-dangerous sibling option" pattern already responsible for GHSA-539m-9xh6-q6rr (archive denylist missing --add-file/--add-virtual-file) and GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf (clone denylist missing --template, since fixed).
Exploit path
- Attacker-controlled input reaches a
separate_git_dir=...(or equivalently"separate-git-dir") keyword argument passed intoRepo.clone_from()/Repo.clone()by the host application, withallow_unsafe_optionsleft at its defaultFalse. Git._option_candidates()renders this as--separate-git-dirandGit.check_unsafe_options()checks it againstRepo.unsafe_git_clone_options, no match, noUnsafeOptionErrorraised.Git.transform_kwargs()renders the same kwarg into the real command line as--separate-git-dir=<attacker path>and GitPython executesgit clone -v --separate-git-dir=<attacker path> -- <url> <dest>viasubprocess(no shell).gititself creates the full repository metadata tree (config,description,HEAD,hooks/,index,objects/,refs/,packed-refs,logs/) at the attacker-specified path, which can be any path outside the intended clone destination that the process has permission to create, and leaves a gitlink file at the intended destination pointing to it.
Preconditions
- The calling application forwards a caller-influenced value into a
separate_git_dirkwarg ofRepo.clone_from()/Repo.clone()(or into themulti_optionslist as a raw--separate-git-dir=...token) without itself validating/rejecting it, and does not passallow_unsafe_options=Trueintentionally. This is the identical trust model GitPython's own denylist already defends for--template/--upload-pack/--config/--bundle-urion the very same code path, i.e. this option was clearly meant to be covered by the same guard and was simply omitted. - No authentication/role requirement inside GitPython itself; the vulnerable code runs the moment the host application calls the API with the option present.
Evidence
git/repo/base.py:145-151,unsafe_git_init_optionsincludes"--separate-git-dir"with the comment "Redirects the repository metadata to a caller-controlled path".git/repo/base.py:153-165,unsafe_git_clone_options(the list actually enforced on_clone) does not include"--separate-git-dir".git/repo/base.py:1450-1452, docstring ofclone_from/cloneexplicitly documents--separate-git-diras one of the optionsallow_unsafe_optionsis supposed to gate.git/repo/base.py:1495-1518,_clone()special-casesseparate_git_dironly toGit.polish_url()it (path normalization for URL-like values), then runs it throughGit.check_unsafe_options(options=..., unsafe_options=cls.unsafe_git_clone_options), which, per the list above, does not flag it.- PoC (
gitpython-001-poc.py, embedded below) run against this exact checkout confirms the option reaches the realgit clonesubprocess unguarded and creates a full git directory outside the destination path, withallow_unsafe_optionsat its defaultFalse.
False-positive check (adversarial re-read)
- Is there a value-level check that would still stop this? No,
check_unsafe_optionsonly inspects option names (via_canonicalize_option_name) against the denylist; it performs no filesystem/path validation onseparate_git_dir's value, and no other guard in_clone()touches this kwarg besides theGit.polish_url()normalization (which does not reject arbitrary paths). - Is
--separate-git-dirperhaps a no-op or safely sandboxed forclonespecifically (unlikeinit)? No, confirmed empirically: the option reaches the realgitbinary unmodified and git honors it exactly as documented, writing the full metadata tree to the given path. - Could this be the exact bug already covered by one of the 26 published GHSAs? Checked all 26 entries in
_known-advisories.json(Filter 0):GHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77rcovers--templateinRepo.init;GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gfcovers--templatein clone (already fixed, present inunsafe_git_clone_options);GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jccovers arbitrary repo creation via unvalidated.gitmodulessubmodule names (a different code path,Submodule, notRepo.clone_from()kwargs). None reference--separate-git-diron the clone path. This is a distinct, currently-unpatched gap. - Does this require an unrealistic precondition? The precondition (host app forwards a kwarg into
clone_from/clone) is identical to the precondition already accepted by the maintainers for the sibling entries in the same list (--template,--upload-pack,--config,--bundle-uri), i.e. it is the same threat model the guard exists to cover, just missing one entry. - Verdict: no concrete blocker found. CONFIRMED.
Confidence
High. Root cause is a one-line, unambiguous omission the maintainers' own docstring contradicts; PoC reproduces cleanly and deterministically against the current HEAD; no plausible false-positive path found.
Proof-of-Concept source (gitpython-001-poc.py)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""
GITPYTHON-001 PoC: Repo.clone_from(separate_git_dir=...) is not in
unsafe_git_clone_options, so it reaches `git clone` unguarded and writes a
full git directory (config, hooks/, objects/, refs/, ...) to an
attacker-controlled path OUTSIDE the intended destination directory, with
allow_unsafe_options left at its default of False.
Run against the GitPython source tree under test, e.g.:
PYTHONPATH="<repo>:<repo>/gitdb:<repo>/smmap" python3 gitpython-001-poc.py <workdir>
Benign: only writes/reads inside the given workdir. No destructive/exfiltrating
payload. Exits non-zero and prints "NOT VULNERABLE" if the guard blocks the option
or the write does not escape the destination directory.
"""
import os
import sys
import subprocess
def main():
workdir = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/gitpython-001-poc"
src = os.path.join(workdir, "src")
dest = os.path.join(workdir, "dest")
sentinel_dir = os.path.join(workdir, "OUTSIDE_SENTINEL")
target_gitdir = os.path.join(sentinel_dir, "redirected.git")
for p in (src, dest, sentinel_dir):
os.makedirs(p, exist_ok=True)
# Minimal benign source repo to clone from.
subprocess.run(["git", "init", "-q", "-b", "main", src], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "config", "user.email", "[email protected]"], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "config", "user.name", "Test"], check=True)
with open(os.path.join(src, "file.txt"), "w") as f:
f.write("hello\n")
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "add", "file.txt"], check=True)
subprocess.run(["git", "-C", src, "commit", "-q", "-m", "init"], check=True)
import git # gitpython under test
print("unsafe_git_clone_options =", git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options)
assert "--separate-git-dir" not in git.Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options, (
"guard now includes --separate-git-dir; PoC no longer applicable, target patched"
)
try:
repo = git.Repo.clone_from(src, dest, separate_git_dir=target_gitdir)
except git.exc.UnsafeOptionError as e:
print("NOT VULNERABLE: blocked by UnsafeOptionError:", e)
sys.exit(1)
wrote_outside = os.path.isdir(os.path.join(target_gitdir, "hooks")) and os.path.isfile(
os.path.join(target_gitdir, "config")
)
gitlink_points_outside = False
with open(os.path.join(dest, ".git")) as f:
gitlink = f.read().strip()
gitlink_points_outside = target_gitdir in gitlink
print("repo.git_dir =", repo.git_dir)
print("wrote git directory outside dest (sentinel) =", wrote_outside)
print("dest/.git gitlink points outside dest =", gitlink_points_outside)
if wrote_outside and gitlink_points_outside:
print("VULNERABLE: git directory created at attacker-controlled path "
f"outside the clone destination: {target_gitdir}")
sys.exit(0)
else:
print("NOT VULNERABLE: sentinel not observed")
sys.exit(1)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Impact
Arbitrary directory/file creation at a path fully controlled by the attacker (bounded only by filesystem permissions of the process running GitPython), matching the impact class of the already-published, High-severity GHSA-hmq2-w58f-27jc ("Arbitrary Git Repository Creation Outside the Working Tree", CVSS 8.2). Concretely:
- Planting a git repository structure (including a
hooks/directory) at an attacker-chosen location outside the sandboxed clone destination the calling application intended to confine the operation to. - If the attacker-chosen path collides with an existing directory the process can write into (e.g. another repository's
.git, a shared cache path, a predictable temp location), the clone silently populates/overwritesconfig,HEAD,hooks/*,refs/*,packed-refs, andindexthere, an integrity violation of a resource outside the intended destination. - Combined with any later operation that runs
gitagainst that redirected/colliding directory (common in CI/build systems that reuse or predict working-directory layouts), this can escalate to hook execution, matching the RCE class already accepted for--templateinGHSA-9rj7-rf2p-w77r.
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
CVE-2026-78677 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.1.59); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Add "--separate-git-dir" (and its - alias if git ever adds one, currently there is none) to Repo.unsafe_git_clone_options in git/repo/base.py, matching unsafe_git_init_options. Since Repo._clone() already special-cases separate_git_dir for Git.polish_url() normalization, the fix is a one-line addition to the existing list, consistent with how GHSA-6p8h-3wgx-97gf added --template to the same list.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-78677? CVE-2026-78677 is a high-severity path traversal vulnerability in GitPython (pip), affecting versions <= 3.1.58. It is fixed in 3.1.59. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- How severe is CVE-2026-78677? CVE-2026-78677 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of GitPython are affected by CVE-2026-78677? GitPython (pip) versions <= 3.1.58 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-78677? Yes. CVE-2026-78677 is fixed in 3.1.59. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-78677 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-78677 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-78677 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-78677? Upgrade
GitPythonto 3.1.59 or later.