CVE-2026-83616

CVE-2026-83616 is a high-severity security vulnerability in @xmldom/xmldom (npm), affecting versions >= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14. It is fixed in 0.8.15, 0.9.12.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

xmldom: Processing Instruction Target Injection Bypasses requireWellFormed

Document.createProcessingInstruction() in @xmldom/xmldom performs no validation on the target parameter. The requireWellFormed: true serializer option validates only for : in the target and a case-insensitive xml prefix, but does not check for > characters. A > in the target breaks the processing instruction boundary (<?...?>), allowing injection of arbitrary content into the serialized XML output.

Details

Document.createProcessingInstruction(target, data) at lib/dom.js around line 2413 accepts any string as the target parameter and stores it on the PI node without validation.

During serialization, the requireWellFormed code path (around line 3286) performs two checks on PI targets:

  1. Rejects targets containing : (namespace prefix check)
  2. Rejects targets matching xml case-insensitively (reserved prefix)

However, it does NOT validate that the target conforms to the XML Name production, and critically does NOT check for > characters. Since processing instructions are serialized as <?target data?>, a > in the target prematurely closes the PI, causing the remaining content to be interpreted as document content by any downstream XML parser.

Root Cause

  1. createProcessingInstruction() performs no validation on target
  2. The serializer's requireWellFormed check is incomplete -- it only checks for : and xml, missing characters that break PI syntax (>, ?, whitespace)
  3. The serializer emits the target verbatim: <?${target} ${data}?>

Proof of Concept

const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

const impl = new DOMImplementation();
const serializer = new XMLSerializer();
const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null);

// PI target containing > breaks the PI boundary
const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('a>', 'data');
doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi);

const output = serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true });
console.log(output);
// Output: <root><?a> data?></root>
//
// The > in the target closes the PI prematurely.
// A downstream XML parser sees:
//   - Processing instruction: <?a?>  (target "a", no data)
//   - Text content: " data?>"
//
// requireWellFormed: true did NOT prevent the injection.

Injecting elements via PI target

const pi2 = doc.createProcessingInstruction(
  'a?><script xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">alert(1)</script><?b',
  ''
);
doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi2);

const output2 = serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true });
console.log(output2);
// Output includes:
//   <?a?><script xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">alert(1)</script><?b ?>
//
// The injected <script> element is valid XHTML that a browser would execute.

Fix Applied

Under requireWellFormed, the serializer validates a processing-instruction target as an XML NCName (a Name with no colon) and rejects a case-insensitive xml, throwing InvalidStateError when the target is ill-formed, so a >, ?, or whitespace in the target is now refused.
On 0.9.12 this replaces an earlier check that already rejected a colon or xml, so the no-colon rule is preserved.
0.8.15 had no processing-instruction target check at all, so the whole target validation is new there.
Non-breaking and opt-in. See the XML Name production.

⚠ Opt-in required. Protection is not automatic. Existing serialization calls remain
vulnerable unless { requireWellFormed: true } is explicitly passed. Applications that
serialize untrusted DOM content should audit all serializeToString() call sites and add it.

Proof of Concept - fixed path

const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom');

const impl = new DOMImplementation();
const serializer = new XMLSerializer();
const doc = impl.createDocument(null, 'root', null);

// PI target containing > breaks the PI boundary
const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('a>', 'data');
doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi);

// Default path: emits the ill-formed target verbatim.
console.log(serializer.serializeToString(doc));
// Output: <root><?a> data?></root>

// Opt-in path: the target check now rejects the break-out character.
try {
  serializer.serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true });
} catch (e) {
  console.log(e.name); // InvalidStateError
}

Why the default stays verbatim

W3C DOM Parsing's require-well-formed flag defaults to false, and the browser XMLSerializer emits the target verbatim in that default mode. Unconditionally throwing on an ill-formed PI target would diverge from that platform behavior and would be an unjustified breaking change, so the stricter validation is gated behind { requireWellFormed: true }. (See the W3C XML Name production and XML Processing Instructions.)

Residual limitation

The default serialization path still emits the ill-formed target verbatim -- only the opt-in requireWellFormed path is protected. Creation-time validation of the target in createProcessingInstruction() is breaking and is deferred to the next breaking release, tracked at xmldom/xmldom#1073.

Impact

Applications that create processing instructions with user-controlled target strings and serialize the result are vulnerable to XML injection. This enables:

  • XML structure injection: Breaking the PI boundary to inject arbitrary elements, text, or additional processing instructions into the output
  • XSS via XHTML: If the serialized output is served as XHTML or processed by a browser-based XML parser, injected script elements will execute
  • XXE chain: Injected DOCTYPE declarations or entity references could trigger XXE in downstream XML parsers that consume the output
  • requireWellFormed bypass: The existing well-formedness checks are incomplete and provide a false sense of security

Affected versions

@xmldom/xmldom (>= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14) @xmldom/xmldom (>= 0.9.0, <= 0.9.11) xmldom (<= 0.6.0)

Security releases

@xmldom/xmldom → 0.8.15 (npm) @xmldom/xmldom → 0.9.12 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

@xmldom/xmldom to 0.8.15 or later; @xmldom/xmldom to 0.9.12 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-83616? CVE-2026-83616 is a high-severity security vulnerability in @xmldom/xmldom (npm), affecting versions >= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14. It is fixed in 0.8.15, 0.9.12.
  2. Which packages are affected by CVE-2026-83616?
    • @xmldom/xmldom (npm) (versions >= 0.7.0, <= 0.8.14)
    • xmldom (npm) (versions <= 0.6.0)
  3. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-83616? Yes. CVE-2026-83616 is fixed in 0.8.15, 0.9.12. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is CVE-2026-83616 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-83616 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-83616 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix CVE-2026-83616?
    • Upgrade @xmldom/xmldom to 0.8.15 or later
    • Upgrade @xmldom/xmldom to 0.9.12 or later

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.