Summary
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
An integer-overflow vulnerability in the frp server's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway lets any unauthenticated remote attacker crash the entire frps process with a single five-byte message. When the gateway parses an SSH exec channel request in pkg/ssh/server.go, it adds a small constant to a four-byte length value taken directly from the request. Because that length is fully attacker-controlled, a value of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the addition wrap around to a tiny number, defeating the only bounds check and forcing an out-of-range slice. Go raises a panic that nothing recovers, so the whole server exits. In the default gateway mode SSH clients are not authenticated and the request is handled before any frp token is checked, so the crash is reachable pre-authentication. It carries no state and is trivially repeatable, turning one crash into a sustained outage that drops every tunnel for every user.
Details
The exec request payload is a four-byte big-endian length followed by that many command bytes, and the length field is fully attacker-controlled. The gateway computes the end of the command as 4 + length. The constant 4 takes the uint32 type of the length field, so 4 + 0xFFFFFFFF wraps modulo 2^32 to 3. The only guard compares the real payload size against this wrapped value, so a five-byte payload passes the test 5 < 3, and the slice runs from index 4 to index 3:
// pkg/ssh/server.go:315-319
end := 4 + binary.BigEndian.Uint32(req.Payload[:4]) // 4 + 0xFFFFFFFF wraps to 3
if len(req.Payload) < int(end) { // 5 < 3 is false, so it passes
continue
}
extraPayload := string(req.Payload[4:end]) // payload[4:3] -> panic
The handler runs in a bare goroutine and no function in the call chain installs a recover, so the panic unwinds to the top of the goroutine and terminates the whole process rather than the single connection:
// pkg/ssh/server.go:226
go s.handleNewChannel(newChannel, extraPayloadCh) // no recover anywhere in the chain
The sink is reachable without credentials in the default configuration. When no authorized-keys file is set, the gateway disables SSH client authentication, which is the default and documented mode where users authenticate through the frp token embedded in the SSH command. The exec request is processed during the channel phase, before that token is validated, so an unauthenticated peer reaches the sink:
// pkg/ssh/gateway.go:74
sshConfig.NoClientAuth = cfg.AuthorizedKeysFile == "" // default: no client auth
Affected product: frp (fatedier), frps server, SSH Tunnel Gateway
Affected versions: v0.53.0 (when the gateway was introduced) through v0.70.0, confirmed against a v0.70.0 build
PoC
The SSH Tunnel Gateway must be enabled with no authorized-keys file, which is the default mode of any deployment that turns the gateway on. No credentials and no knowledge of the target are required.
Enable the gateway on a stock v0.70.0 build:
bindPort = 7000
[sshTunnelGateway]
bindPort = 2200
As an unauthenticated SSH client, open a session channel and send one exec request whose four-byte length prefix is 0xFFFFFFFF followed by a single byte, giving the five-byte payload ff ff ff ff 41. The server immediately panics and exits:
panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [4:3]
...github.com/fatedier/frp/pkg/ssh.(*TunnelServer).handleNewChannel
.../frp/pkg/ssh/server.go:319
The shell prompt returns in the server terminal, confirming the whole process has terminated and every other client tunnel is dropped at the same instant. A well-formed request of the same length (prefix 1) leaves the server running, proving the crash is caused by the overflow value and not by the exec request itself. The attacker can re-send the payload after any restart to hold the server down indefinitely.
Impact
This is an unauthenticated remote denial of service (CWE-190) leading to an out-of-range array index (CWE-129) and an unhandled process crash (CWE-755). A single five-byte, credential-free message kills the entire frps process. Because one frps commonly multiplexes the tunnels of many clients, the crash drops every active tunnel for every tenant at once and new logins are refused until the process is restarted, and re-sending the payload after each restart keeps the service down indefinitely (CWE-400). There is no confidentiality or integrity impact and no code execution.
This issue only affects frps instances with the SSH tunnel gateway explicitly enabled. The SSH tunnel gateway is disabled by default and is not commonly used in typical frps deployments. Default frps configurations are not affected.
An arithmetic operation produces a value that exceeds the integer type's maximum, causing it to wrap to an unexpected small value. Typical impact: incorrect size calculations leading to heap overflows or logic errors.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP? GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP is a high-severity integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in github.com/fatedier/frp (go), affecting versions >= 0.53.0, <= 0.70.0. It is fixed in 0.70.1. An arithmetic operation produces a value that exceeds the integer type's maximum, causing it to wrap to an unexpected small value.
- Which versions of github.com/fatedier/frp are affected by GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP? github.com/fatedier/frp (go) versions >= 0.53.0, <= 0.70.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP? Yes. GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP is fixed in 0.70.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-26GQ-P25F-99CP? Upgrade
github.com/fatedier/frpto 0.70.1 or later.