Summary
yara-x: Unvalidated deserialization in safe Rules::deserialize allows memory corruption and UB
[!NOTE]
This finding was identified during an agentic unsafe Rust code review performed by Gemini AI, followed by human review and verification.
The Issue
The crate exports a public safe API Rules::deserialize accepting any generic byte sequence B: AsRef<[u8]>. It restores compiled rule structures directly from raw bytes using bincode::serde::decode_from_slice.
This decoded Rules struct contains internal lookup tables, including sub_patterns: Vec<(PatternId, SubPattern)>, atoms: Vec<SubPatternAtom>, and lit_pool: BStringPool. Subsequent safe operations assume these internal tables satisfy strict structural invariants:
Rules::get_sub_patternexecutesunsafe { self.sub_patterns.get_unchecked(sub_pattern_id.0 as usize) }. If untrusted serialized bytes contain an atom referencing an out-of-boundsSubPatternId, callingget_sub_patternduring scanning triggers an out-of-bounds memory read (Undefined Behavior).
Metadata::next()extracts string metadata viaunsafe { s.to_str_unchecked() }. If serialized bytes corruptlit_poolindices or structural data,to_str_uncheckedconstructs a&strpointing to invalid UTF-8 bytes (Undefined Behavior).
Because passing malformed or untrusted data to Rules::deserialize induces Undefined Behavior in subsequent safe calls (Scanner::new, Scanner::scan) without any unsafe blocks in caller code, this API is unsound.
Zip file with crashing_payload:
crashing_payload.zip
We have a payload crashing_payload.bin where only a single byte in the structural metadata tail is mutated (changing a SubPatternId from 1 to 248 while keeping the WebAssembly bytecode completely untouched and valid).
Below is the self-contained verification script which compiles and runs against the official unmodified yara-x v1.17.0 crate:
use yara_x::{Rules, Scanner};
fn main() {
// Embed the crashing payload generated by the fuzzer at compile time.
let serialized = include_bytes!("crashing_payload.bin");
println!("Loaded embedded crashing payload, length: {}", serialized.len());
// Deserialize. On unmodified library, this succeeds because the WASM and headers
// are pristine and structural corruption isn't validated.
if let Ok(deserialized) = Rules::deserialize(serialized) {
println!("Deserialization succeeded! Running scanner...");
let mut scanner = Scanner::new(&deserialized);
// Run the standard scan, which will execute the WASM and trigger the out-of-bounds read!
let _ = scanner.scan(b"lorem ipsum dolor sit amet");
println!("Scanner finished.");
} else {
println!("Deserialization failed!");
}
}
1. Miri Trace
NOTE: This needs to be run with 1.17.0. I haven't tested this against other versions.
Unfortunately I was able to get a miri trace, but I'm not able to reproduce it right now because of lockfile changes. If you're trying this out be sure to use MIRIFLAGS="-Zmiri-disable-stacked-borrows"
2. Segfault / panics
When run natively (without Miri or any sanitizers) on a standard Linux platform, the process immediately segfaults:
$ cargo run --bin verify
Loaded embedded crashing payload, length: 11777
Deserialization succeeded! Running scanner...
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
And with a newer compiler (which appears to have debug assertions in get_unchecked)
Deserialization succeeded! Running scanner...
thread 'main' (997442) panicked at lib/src/compiler/rules.rs:404:36:
unsafe precondition(s) violated: slice::get_unchecked requires that the index is within the slice
This indicates a bug in the program. This Undefined Behavior check is optional, and cannot be relied on for safety.
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
Suggested FixTo uphold Rust soundness guarantees, either mark Rules::deserialize as pub unsafe fn deserialize with a formal /// # Safety contract documenting that callers are responsible for verifying the authenticity and structural integrity of the input bytes (e.g. via cryptographic signatures), or replace all internal get_unchecked and to_str_unchecked calls on deserialized data structures with safe bounds checks (.get()) and UTF-8 validation (std::str::from_utf8).
Impact
Untrusted serialized data is processed by a deserializer that can instantiate arbitrary objects or execute code as a side effect. Typical impact: arbitrary code execution or logic abuse.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ? GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ is a medium-severity insecure deserialization vulnerability in yara-x (rust), affecting versions <= 1.18.0. It is fixed in 1.19.0. Untrusted serialized data is processed by a deserializer that can instantiate arbitrary objects or execute code as a side effect.
- Which versions of yara-x are affected by GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ? yara-x (rust) versions <= 1.18.0 is affected.
- Is there a fix for GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ? Yes. GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ is fixed in 1.19.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-2JX3-FF3V-J7JJ? Upgrade
yara-xto 1.19.0 or later.