GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G

GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G is a medium-severity security vulnerability in code.vikunja.io/api (go), affecting versions >= 2.3.0, <= 2.6.0. It is fixed in 2.7.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Vikunja: WebSocket authentication ignores server-side session state, so revoked sessions keep receiving live pushes

Vikunja v2.6.0 introduced server-side sessions with revocation semantics: DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} documents "Revokes a specific session by its UUID", and enabling TOTP calls DeleteAllUserSessions to invalidate all sessions. The WebSocket endpoint accepts any cryptographically valid user JWT without ever resolving its sid (session id) claim against the sessions table. A connection authenticated before revocation stays authenticated and continues to receive live pushes indefinitely, and even brand-new WebSocket connections are accepted with a token whose session was deleted. The revocation feature therefore does not cover the WebSocket boundary at all.

Details

User access JWTs carry a session reference: NewUserJWTAuthtoken (pkg/modules/auth/auth.go:188) sets claims["sid"] = sessionID, and the API login-session documentation describes the claim as tying the JWT to a server-side session. On the HTTP side nothing consumes the claim per request either (REST access tokens simply expire after their short TTL, a design the maintainers documented when fixing GHSA-96q5, and refresh tokens are correctly invalidated when the session row is deleted).

The WebSocket endpoint GET /api/v2/ws authenticates through the first client message. Connection.handleAuth (pkg/websocket/connection.go:168) validates the token exclusively with auth.GetUserIDFromToken (pkg/modules/auth/auth.go:292):

func GetUserIDFromToken(tokenString string) (int64, error) {
	token, err := jwt.Parse(tokenString, func(_ *jwt.Token) (any, error) {
		return []byte(config.ServiceSecret.GetString()), nil
	})
	...
	typ, ok := claims["type"].(float64)
	if !ok || int(typ) != AuthTypeUser {
		return 0, jwt.ErrTokenInvalidClaims
	}
	...
}

The function verifies signature and token type only. No session lookup occurs anywhere in the WebSocket path, and no re-validation happens after the initial auth. Consequently:

  1. A connection authenticated before DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} (or before TOTP enable, which runs models.DeleteAllUserSessions, pkg/routes/api/v2/user_totp.go:208) remains registered in the hub and keeps receiving every subscribed event, such as notification.created with the full notification object including comment, task and project content.
  2. A new connection opened after the deletion, using the same pre-revocation token, authenticates successfully.
  3. Session deletion is observable only in the REST surface. The user's session list empties, the refresh token dies on next use, but the WebSocket channel never notices.

For REST the exposure is bounded by the 10-minute access-token TTL. For WebSocket it is not: a connection lives until the client closes it, so a session the user believes revoked retains a live, server-pushed data channel with no time bound.

PoC

vikunja-ws-auth-ignores-session-revocation-PoC.zip

The attached archive contains deployment/deploy.sh (local Vikunja v2.6.0 on loopback with SQLite) and poc/poc.sh running poc/poc.py:

  1. Victim registers and logs in. Second user registers for later interaction.
  2. Control: the victim's WebSocket authenticates and subscribes to notification.created. Negative control: a garbage token is rejected with invalid_token.
  3. Every victim session is deleted via DELETE /api/v2/user/sessions/{id} (the list afterwards reports 0 remaining).
  4. Exploit A: a brand-new WebSocket connection authenticates successfully with the deleted-session token.
  5. Exploit B: the second user comments on a task mentioning the victim. The victim's pre-revocation WebSocket connection receives the notification.created push with the full notification payload.

Result: 10 checks passed on two consecutive runs, each from a wiped database.

Impact

Session revocation, the mechanism a user relies on when a device is lost or a token is suspected stolen, silently excludes the WebSocket channel. A stolen or leaked access token can be converted into a push channel that survives every revocation action available to the user, including TOTP enrollment whose documented purpose is invalidating all sessions, and keeps delivering the victim's notifications (comment mentions, task and project metadata) until the attacker chooses to disconnect. The fix is to resolve the sid claim against the sessions table during handleAuth and to re-validate or drop hub connections when their session is deleted.

GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.7.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

code.vikunja.io/api (>= 2.3.0, <= 2.6.0)

Security releases

code.vikunja.io/api → 2.7.0 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade code.vikunja.io/api to 2.7.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G? GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G is a medium-severity security vulnerability in code.vikunja.io/api (go), affecting versions >= 2.3.0, <= 2.6.0. It is fixed in 2.7.0.
  2. How severe is GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G? GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G has a CVSS score of 6.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of code.vikunja.io/api are affected by GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G? code.vikunja.io/api (go) versions >= 2.3.0, <= 2.6.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G? Yes. GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G is fixed in 2.7.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix GHSA-4HV6-XC92-J86G? Upgrade code.vikunja.io/api to 2.7.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in code.vikunja.io/api

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.