GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4

GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4 is a low-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in openclaw (npm), affecting versions <= 2026.2.25. It is fixed in 2026.2.26.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

OpenClaw: Microsoft Teams media fetch paths bypass shared SSRF guard model

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Latest published vulnerable version: 2026.2.25
  • Affected range: <= 2026.2.25
  • Planned patched version for next release: 2026.2.26

Technical Details

The Microsoft Teams attachment/media code previously relied on plugin-local fetch behavior in parts of the flow, instead of uniformly using shared guarded fetch logic with pinned DNS + policy checks. This could allow policy drift and SSRF boundary inconsistency between channel/plugin paths.

The fix unifies this path by:

  • routing Microsoft Teams Graph message/hosted-content/attachment fetches through shared SSRF-guarded fetch paths,
  • routing auth-scope fallback attachment downloads through the same guarded policy model,
  • centralizing hostname-suffix allowlist policy helpers in plugin-sdk so channel/plugins use the same allowlist normalization and policy construction behavior.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 57334cd7d85174d5f951de01114fd5801b063564

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

Impact

Microsoft Teams media handling used mixed fetch paths for Graph metadata/content and attachment auth-retry flows. Some paths bypassed the shared SSRF guard model and created inconsistent host/DNS enforcement across redirect/fetch hops.

Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside. Typical impact: access to internal metadata services, internal APIs, or cloud credentials.

Affected versions

openclaw (<= 2026.2.25)

Security releases

openclaw → 2026.2.26 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade openclaw to 2026.2.26 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4? GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4 is a low-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in openclaw (npm), affecting versions <= 2026.2.25. It is fixed in 2026.2.26. Untrusted input controls the target URL of a server-initiated request, which may reach internal services not otherwise accessible from outside.
  2. Which versions of openclaw are affected by GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4? openclaw (npm) versions <= 2026.2.25 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4? Yes. GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4 is fixed in 2026.2.26. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix GHSA-7QF6-H84J-8FQ4? Upgrade openclaw to 2026.2.26 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in openclaw

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.