Summary
webpki: Name constraints for URI names were incorrectly accepted
Name constraints for URI names were ignored and therefore accepted.
Note this library does not provide an API for asserting URI names, and URI name constraints are otherwise not implemented. URI name constraints are now rejected unconditionally.
Since name constraints are restrictions on otherwise properly-issued certificates, this bug is reachable only after signature verification and requires misissuance to exploit.
Impact
GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 has a CVSS score of 2.2 (Low). The vector is network-reachable, high privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.103.12, 0.104.0-alpha.6); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
rustls-webpki to 0.103.12 or later; rustls-webpki to 0.104.0-alpha.6 or later
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5? GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 is a low-severity security vulnerability in rustls-webpki (rust), affecting versions >= 0.101.0, < 0.103.12. It is fixed in 0.103.12, 0.104.0-alpha.6.
- How severe is GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5? GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 has a CVSS score of 2.2 (Low). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of rustls-webpki are affected by GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5? rustls-webpki (rust) versions >= 0.101.0, < 0.103.12 is affected.
- Is there a fix for GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5? Yes. GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 is fixed in 0.103.12, 0.104.0-alpha.6. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-965H-392X-2MH5?
- Upgrade
rustls-webpkito 0.103.12 or later - Upgrade
rustls-webpkito 0.104.0-alpha.6 or later
- Upgrade