GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75

GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75 is a high-severity race condition vulnerability in @envelop/graphql-modules (npm), affecting versions < 9.1.0. It is fixed in 9.1.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

@envelop/graphql-modules has a Race Condition vulnerability

Context race condition when using useGraphQLModules plugin

Details

Related to: https://github.com/graphql-hive/graphql-modules/security/advisories/GHSA-53wg-r69p-v3r7

When 2 or more parallel requests are made which trigger the same service, the context of the requests is mixed up in the service when the context is injected via @ExecutionContext() and graphql-modules are used in Yoga with useGraphQLModules(application). This issue was fixed in graphql-modules in 2.4.1 and 3.1.1 but using useGraphQLModules will bypass the async_hooks fix that was implemented.

PoC

Create the following package.json and run npm i

{
  "name": "poc",
  "scripts": {
    "compile": "tsc",
    "start": "npm run compile && node ./dist/src/index.js",
    "test": "npm run compile && node ./dist/test/bleedtest.js"
  },
  "dependencies": {
    "@envelop/graphql-modules": "^9.0.0",
    "graphql-yoga": "^5.0.0",
    "graphql": "^16.10.0",
    "graphql-modules": "3.1.1",
    "reflect-metadata": "0.2.1",
    "axios": "^1.8.4"
  },
  "devDependencies": {
    "@types/node": "^22.14.1",
    "typescript": "^5.8.3"
  }
}

Define the app entrypoint: src/index.ts

import { module } from "./module.js";
import { useGraphQLModules } from '@envelop/graphql-modules'
import { createApplication } from "graphql-modules";
import { createServer } from 'node:http'
import { randomUUID } from "node:crypto";
import { createYoga } from 'graphql-yoga';

const application = createApplication({
    modules: [module]
})

const yoga = createYoga({
    schema: application.schema,
    plugins: [useGraphQLModules(application)],
    context() {
        return {
            requestId: randomUUID(),
        }
    }
})

const server = createServer(yoga)
server.listen(4001, '127.0.0.1', undefined, () => {
    console.info(
        `[Server] Running on http://localhost:4001/graphql`
    )
})

Create the test module: src/module.ts

import { createModule, gql } from "graphql-modules";
import Service from "./service.js";

const typeDefs = gql`
    type Book {
        id1: String
        id2: String
    }
    type Query {
        books: [Book]
    }
`;

export const module = createModule({
    id: 'book-module',
    typeDefs: [typeDefs],
    providers: [Service],
    resolvers: {
        Query: {
            // return one empty book
            books: () => [{}],
        },
        Book: {
            // return the requestId from the context
            id1: async (_root, _args, { injector } ) => {
                return injector.get(Service).get();
            },
            // return the requestId from the context of the service 100 ms later
            id2: async (_root, _args, { injector } ) => {
                await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, 100));
                return injector.get(Service).get()
            },
        }
    }
})

Add the Service that's to be injected src/service.ts

import { ExecutionContext, Injectable } from 'graphql-modules';
import 'reflect-metadata';

@Injectable()
export default class Service {
    @ExecutionContext()
    private context: ExecutionContext;

    get() {
        return this.context.requestId;
    }
}

Add the test case test/bleedtest.js

import axios from 'axios';

const url = 'http://localhost:4001/graphql';
const query = `query { books { id1 id2 } }`;

const makeGraphQLRequest = async () => {
    const response = await axios.post(url, { query });

    const book = response.data.data.books[0]
    if (book.id1 !== book.id2) {
        throw new Error(`wrong response with ids ${(book.id1)} and ${(book.id2)}`)
    }
}

const numberOfRequests = 2;
await Promise.all(Array.from(
    { length: numberOfRequests },
    makeGraphQLRequest,
));

Then run the server with npm run start in one terminal and the testcase in another with npm run test.
The returned IDs should be identical as they are both read from the context within the same request.
However, there is a mismatch:

❯ npm run test

> [email protected] test
> npm run compile && node ./dist/test/bleedtest.js


> [email protected] compile
> tsc

file://<redacted>/dist/test/bleedtest.js:8
        throw new Error(`wrong response with ids ${(book.id1)} and ${(book.id2)}`);
              ^

Error: wrong response with ids c2d83151-0922-4f25-a3e9-2f03acc1376a and e16c7335-0eaa-4386-b415-869ee4b05315
    at makeGraphQLRequest (file://<redacted>/dist/test/bleedtest.js:8:15)
    at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:95:5)
    at async Promise.all (index 0)
    at async file://<redacted>/dist/test/bleedtest.js:12:1

Impact

Any application that uses useGraphQLModules from @envelop/graphql-modules along with services that inject the context using @ExecutionContext() from a singleton provider are at risk. The more traffic an application has, the higher the chance for parallel requests, the higher the risk.

Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing. Typical impact: TOCTOU exploits, data corruption, or privilege escalation.

Affected versions

@envelop/graphql-modules (< 9.1.0)

Security releases

@envelop/graphql-modules → 9.1.0 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade @envelop/graphql-modules to 9.1.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75? GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75 is a high-severity race condition vulnerability in @envelop/graphql-modules (npm), affecting versions < 9.1.0. It is fixed in 9.1.0. Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing.
  2. Which versions of @envelop/graphql-modules are affected by GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75? @envelop/graphql-modules (npm) versions < 9.1.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75? Yes. GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75 is fixed in 9.1.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix GHSA-H3HW-29FV-2X75? Upgrade @envelop/graphql-modules to 9.1.0 or later.

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.