GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P

Apollo Router Core: Browser Bug Enables Bypass of XS-Search Prevention via Read-Only Cross-Site Request Forgery

# config.yaml
rhai:
  scripts: "/directory/with/rhai/script"
  main: "main.rhai"

# main.rhai
fn router_service(service) {
    const request_callback = Fn("process_request");
    service.map_request(request_callback);
}

fn process_request(request) {
    if "content-type" in request.headers {
        if request.headers["content-type"].contains("message/") {
            throw "Error: invalid content type"
        }
    }
}

In a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack, untrusted web content causes browsers to send authenticated requests to web servers which use cookies for authentication. While the web content is prevented from reading the request's response due to the Cross-Origin Request Sharing (CORS) protocol, the attacker may be able to cause side effects in the server ("CSRF" attack), or learn something about the response via timing analysis ("XS-Search" attack).

Apollo Router has a built-in feature which prevents CSRF and XS-Search attacks: it refuses to process GraphQL requests that could possibly have been sent by a spec-compliant web browser without a protective "preflight" step. See Apollo Router's docs for more details on CORS, CSRF attacks, and Apollo Router's CSRF prevention feature.

This feature is fully effective against attacks carried out against users of spec-compliant browsers. Unfortunately, a major browser introduced a bug in 2025 which meant in certain cases, it failed to follow the CORS spec. The browser's maintainers have already committed to fixing the bug and making the browser spec-compliant again.

Even with this bug, Apollo Router's CSRF prevention feature blocks "side effect" CSRF attacks: Apollo Router will still correctly refuse to execute mutations in requests that were not preflighted. However, some specially crafted authenticated GraphQL queries can be issued across origins without preflight in buggy versions of this browser, allowing for XS-Search attacks: an attacker can analyze response times to learn facts about the responses to requests such as whether fields return null or approximately how many list entries are returned from fields.

Apollo Router installations are only vulnerable if they rely on cookies (or HTTP Basic Auth) for authentication.

Kodem intelligence

Already deployed Kodem?

The vulnerability is patched in the following versions of Apollo Router:

• 2.12.1 (latest)
• 2.10.2 (v2.10 LTS)
• 1.61.13 (v1; note that Router v1 reaches end-of-support on March 31 2026)

These releases contain a single change: GraphQL requests sent in HTTP GET requests which contain a Content-Type header naming a type other than application/json are rejected. (GET requests with no Content-Type are allowed.) This change prevents XS-Search attacks even in browsers which are non-compliant in ways similar to this browser.

There are no known cases where GraphQL apps depend on the ability of clients to send non-empty Content-Type headers with GET requests other than application/json, so this change has not been made configurable; if this change breaks a specific use case, contact support and more configurability can be added.

1. What is GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P? GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P is a medium-severity security vulnerability in apollo-router (rust), affecting versions >= 2.11.0, < 2.12.1. It is fixed in 2.12.1, 2.10.2, 1.61.13.
2. Which versions of apollo-router are affected by GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P? apollo-router (rust) versions >= 2.11.0, < 2.12.1 is affected.
3. Is there a fix for GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P? Yes. GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P is fixed in 2.12.1, 2.10.2, 1.61.13. Upgrade to this version or later.
4. Is GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
5. What actually determines whether GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
6. How do I fix GHSA-HFF2-GCPX-8F4P?
   • Upgrade apollo-router to 2.12.1 or later
   • Upgrade apollo-router to 2.10.2 or later
   • Upgrade apollo-router to 1.61.13 or later

Other vulnerabilities in apollo-router