GHSA-HP6V-6JW7-GV2F

Budibase's OIDC SSO login links an incoming SSO identity to an existing Budibase account by email address alone, without ever checking the email_verified claim of the OIDC ID token. Budibase first tries to match the IdP sub; when that misses (any fresh attacker IdP account) it silently falls back to matching by the email claim and merges into the existing account by email, preserving that account's _id and roles. Because the email_verified flag is never read, an attacker who can make a configured/trusted IdP emit a token carrying email = <victim> with email_verified = false is logged into Budibase as the victim, inheriting the victim's roles (including global admin/builder). Per OIDC Core §5.7 the email claim MUST NOT be used as an identity key unless email_verified is true; Budibase effectively delegates all account-linking trust to every configured IdP's email-verification policy while checking nothing itself. Full account takeover of any existing Budibase user, including the instance owner.

Details

The OIDC verify callback extracts the email and never consults email_verified:

• packages/backend-core/src/middleware/passport/sso/oidc.ts:59, email: getEmail(profile, jwtClaims).
• getEmail (oidc.ts:113-135) returns profile._json.email ->jwtClaims.email -> preferred_username. No email_verified check.
• buildJwtClaims (oidc.ts:99-107) assembles claims from _json.email/emails[0].value, no verification flag is read. grep -r email_verified packages/ -> 0 hits.

The email is then used as the account-linking key:

• sso.authenticate(...) -> packages/backend-core/src/middleware/passport/sso/sso.ts:
  • :38,44 users.getById(generateGlobalUserID(details.userId)) keyed on the IdP sub; for a fresh attacker IdP account this 404s and is swallowed (:45-54).
  • :57-59 fallback: dbUser = await users.getGlobalUserByEmail(details.email) -> loads the victim's account (victim _id + roles) purely by email (packages/backend-core/src/users/users.ts:100-124, USER_BY_EMAIL view, no binding to the IdP sub).
  • syncUser(...) (sso.ts:80,102-138) spreads ...user, preserving the victim _id/tenantId/roles; only overwrites provider fields.
• UserDB.save (packages/backend-core/src/users/db.ts:235): because ssoUser._id is the victim's, the _id branch runs (:253), getById(_id) matches the victim (:256), the "Email address cannot be changed" guard (:257-259) does not fire (dbUser.email === email), and the EmailUnavailableError guard (:269-275) is skipped (it only runs in the !dbUser branch). The merge proceeds silently; a session JWT is issued for the victim.

Per OIDC Core §5.7, the email claim MUST NOT be used as an identity key unless email_verified is true. Budibase never reads the flag.

Preconditions (attack requirement, AT:P): the attacker must be able to authenticate through an IdP that the Budibase instance trusts AND get that IdP to assert the victim's email with email_verified = false. This is reachable, not exotic:

• Self-registration with an unverified email, Keycloak and Authentik ship with "Verify Email" OFF by default; if the trusted IdP allows public sign-up, the attacker registers a new account and simply enters email = <victim> at sign-up. No confirmation email is needed, the IdP stores and asserts it unverified.
• Self-service profile editing, many IdPs let a logged-in user change their own email without forced re-verification.
• Attacker-operated / federated IdP or permissive social login, where the attacker controls or influences a trusted provider, or the provider asserts a user-typed (unverified) email.
  It is not exploitable through a strict corporate IdP that enforces email verification (there email_verified = true and the attacker cannot claim the victim's address), which is exactly why Budibase must check the flag rather than assume every configured IdP enforces it. The defect is unconditional on the Budibase side; the attack requirement is purely the (default, common) IdP email policy.

PoC

Reproduced live on Budibase 3.39.14 (self-hosted, community license) against a stock Keycloak 26 realm budi with default "Verify Email" = off; OIDC client registered and activated in Budibase.

Setup: a pre-existing victim global-admin Budibase account [email protected] (_id = us_1ab2dfcf…, local account, no IdP link). The attacker owns their own IdP account (attacker, distinct sub) and can set its email attribute unverified.

Step 1, the IdP asserts the claim (proves email_verified=false):

POST /realms/budi/protocol/openid-connect/token   (Keycloak)
grant_type=password&client_id=budibase&client_secret=…&username=attacker&password=Attacker123!&scope=openid email profile
-> id_token payload: { "sub":"3cf58c45-…", "preferred_username":"attacker",
                      "email":"[email protected]", "email_verified":false }

The authenticated principal is provably attacker (its own sub/preferred_username/password), merely claiming the victim's email, unverified.

Step 2, drive the standard OIDC flow as attacker:
GET /api/global/auth/default/oidc/configs/kc-oidc-1 -> IdP login as attacker/Attacker123! -> GET /api/global/auth/oidc/callback?code=…&state=….

Step 3, result (takeover): Budibase sets budibase:auth to a session JWT
{ "userId":"us_1ab2dfcf…", "email":"[email protected]", "tenantId":"default" }, and
GET /api/global/self returns the victim: _id = us_1ab2dfcf…, admin.global = true, builder.global = true, providerType = oidc. The attacker authenticated as a different IdP principal with an unverified email yet now holds a full global-admin session for the victim.

Negative control (proves the email claim is the cause, not a normal self-login):
A second attacker attacker2 with a benign unverified email [email protected] (matching no Budibase user) runs the identical flow:

id_token: { "sub":"55794bf2-…", "preferred_username":"attacker2", "email":"[email protected]", "email_verified":false }
-> budibase:auth: { "userId":"us_55794bf2-…" }   (a NEW account, _id derived from the IdP sub)
-> /api/global/self: { "_id":"us_55794bf2-…", "email":"[email protected]", admin.global: null, builder.global: null }

With a benign email the attacker gets their own new low-privilege account; only when the email claim equals the victim's does the same flow yield the victim's admin account. Same self-authentication, single variable changed = the unverified-email merge is the vulnerability.