GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR

GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR is a critical-severity security vulnerability in org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven), affecting versions >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11. It is fixed in 2.0.11, 1.11.10.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

Remote code injection in Log4j (through pax-logging-log4j2)

Workarounds

Set system property -Dlog4j2.formatMsgNoLookups=true

References

https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-jfh8-c2jp-5v3q

Impact

Remote Code Execution.

Affected versions

org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (>= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11) org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (< 1.11.10)

Security releases

org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 → 2.0.11 (maven) org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 → 1.11.10 (maven)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Users of pax-logging 1.11.9 should update to 1.11.10.
Users of pax-logging 2.0.10 should update to 2.0.11.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR? GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR is a critical-severity security vulnerability in org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven), affecting versions >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11. It is fixed in 2.0.11, 1.11.10.
  2. Which versions of org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 are affected by GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR? org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 (maven) versions >= 2.0.0, < 2.0.11 is affected.
  3. Is there a fix for GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR? Yes. GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR is fixed in 2.0.11, 1.11.10. Upgrade to this version or later.
  4. Is GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  5. What actually determines whether GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  6. How do I fix GHSA-XXFH-X98P-J8FR?
    • Upgrade org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 to 2.0.11 or later
    • Upgrade org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2 to 1.11.10 or later

Other vulnerabilities in org.ops4j.pax.logging:pax-logging-log4j2

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.