Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: qrtr: Fix a refcount...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: qrtr: Fix a refcount bug in qrtr_recvmsg()
Syzbot reported a bug as following:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
...
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x17c/0x1f0 lib/refcount.c:25
...
Call Trace:
__refcount_add include/linux/refcount.h:199 [inline]
__refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:250 [inline]
refcount_inc include/linux/refcount.h:267 [inline]
kref_get include/linux/kref.h:45 [inline]
qrtr_node_acquire net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:202 [inline]
qrtr_node_lookup net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:398 [inline]
qrtr_send_resume_tx net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:1003 [inline]
qrtr_recvmsg+0x85f/0x990 net/qrtr/af_qrtr.c:1070
sock_recvmsg_nosec net/socket.c:1017 [inline]
sock_recvmsg+0xe2/0x160 net/socket.c:1038
qrtr_ns_worker+0x170/0x1700 net/qrtr/ns.c:688
process_one_work+0x991/0x15c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2390
worker_thread+0x669/0x1090 kernel/workqueue.c:2537
It occurs in the concurrent scenario of qrtr_recvmsg() and
qrtr_endpoint_unregister() as following:
cpu0 cpu1
qrtr_recvmsg qrtr_endpoint_unregister
qrtr_send_resume_tx qrtr_node_release
qrtr_node_lookup mutex_lock(&qrtr_node_lock)
spin_lock_irqsave(&qrtr_nodes_lock, ) refcount_dec_and_test(&node->ref) [node->ref == 0]
radix_tree_lookup [node != NULL] __qrtr_node_release
qrtr_node_acquire spin_lock_irqsave(&qrtr_nodes_lock, )
kref_get(&node->ref) [WARNING] ...
mutex_unlock(&qrtr_node_lock)
Use qrtr_node_lock to protect qrtr_node_lookup() implementation, this
is actually improving the protection of node reference.
Impact
CVE-2023-53445 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-53445? CVE-2023-53445 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2023-53445? CVE-2023-53445 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-53445? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2023-53445 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2023-53445 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-53445 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-53445 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.