Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: don't reset...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
f2fs: don't reset unchangable mount option in f2fs_remount()
syzbot reports a bug as below:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000009: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x69/0x2000 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4942
Call Trace:
lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5691
__raw_write_lock include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:209 [inline]
_raw_write_lock+0x2e/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:300
__drop_extent_tree+0x3ac/0x660 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c:1100
f2fs_drop_extent_tree+0x17/0x30 fs/f2fs/extent_cache.c:1116
f2fs_insert_range+0x2d5/0x3c0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1664
f2fs_fallocate+0x4e4/0x6d0 fs/f2fs/file.c:1838
vfs_fallocate+0x54b/0x6b0 fs/open.c:324
ksys_fallocate fs/open.c:347 [inline]
__do_sys_fallocate fs/open.c:355 [inline]
__se_sys_fallocate fs/open.c:353 [inline]
__x64_sys_fallocate+0xbd/0x100 fs/open.c:353
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
The root cause is race condition as below:
- since it tries to remount rw filesystem, so that do_remount won't
call sb_prepare_remount_readonly to block fallocate, there may be race
condition in between remount and fallocate. - in f2fs_remount(), default_options() will reset mount option to default
one, and then update it based on result of parse_options(), so there is
a hole which race condition can happen.
Thread A Thread B
f2fs_fill_super
parse_options
clear_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE)
f2fs_remount
default_options
set_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE)
- f2fs_fallocate
- f2fs_insert_range
- f2fs_drop_extent_tree
- __drop_extent_tree
- __may_extent_tree
- test_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE) return true
- write_lock(&et->lock) access NULL pointerparse_options
clear_opt(READ_EXTENT_CACHE)
Impact
Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing. Typical impact: TOCTOU exploits, data corruption, or privilege escalation.
CVE-2023-53447 has a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-53447? CVE-2023-53447 is a medium-severity race condition vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet. Multiple concurrent operations access a shared resource without proper synchronization, producing unpredictable results depending on timing.
- How severe is CVE-2023-53447? CVE-2023-53447 has a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-53447? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2023-53447 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2023-53447 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-53447 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-53447 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.