Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf: RISC-V: Remove...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf: RISC-V: Remove PERF_HES_STOPPED flag checking in riscv_pmu_start()
Since commit 096b52fd2bb4 ("perf: RISC-V: throttle perf events") the
perf_sample_event_took() function was added to report time spent in
overflow interrupts. If the interrupt takes too long, the perf framework
will lower the sysctl_perf_event_sample_rate and max_samples_per_tick.
When hwc->interrupts is larger than max_samples_per_tick, the
hwc->interrupts will be set to MAX_INTERRUPTS, and events will be
throttled within the __perf_event_account_interrupt() function.
However, the RISC-V PMU driver doesn't call riscv_pmu_stop() to update the
PERF_HES_STOPPED flag after perf_event_overflow() in pmu_sbi_ovf_handler()
function to avoid throttling. When the perf framework unthrottled the event
in the timer interrupt handler, it triggers riscv_pmu_start() function
and causes a WARN_ON_ONCE() warning, as shown below:
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 240 at drivers/perf/riscv_pmu.c:184 riscv_pmu_start+0x7c/0x8e
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 240 Comm: ls Not tainted 6.4-rc4-g19d0788e9ef2 #1
Hardware name: SiFive (DT)
epc : riscv_pmu_start+0x7c/0x8e
ra : riscv_pmu_start+0x28/0x8e
epc : ffffffff80aef864 ra : ffffffff80aef810 sp : ffff8f80004db6f0
gp : ffffffff81c83750 tp : ffffaf80069f9bc0 t0 : ffff8f80004db6c0
t1 : 0000000000000000 t2 : 000000000000001f s0 : ffff8f80004db720
s1 : ffffaf8008ca1068 a0 : 0000ffffffffffff a1 : 0000000000000000
a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 0000000000000870 a4 : 0000000000000000
a5 : 0000000000000000 a6 : 0000000000000840 a7 : 0000000000000030
s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : ffffaf8005165800 s4 : ffffaf800424da00
s5 : ffffffffffffffff s6 : ffffffff81cc7590 s7 : 0000000000000000
s8 : 0000000000000006 s9 : 0000000000000001 s10: ffffaf807efbc340
s11: ffffaf807efbbf00 t3 : ffffaf8006a16028 t4 : 00000000dbfbb796
t5 : 0000000700000000 t6 : ffffaf8005269870
status: 0000000200000100 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 0000000000000003
[] riscv_pmu_start+0x7c/0x8e
[] perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context+0x15e/0x174
[] perf_event_task_tick+0x88/0x9c
[] scheduler_tick+0xfe/0x27c
[] update_process_times+0x9a/0xba
[] tick_sched_handle+0x32/0x66
[] tick_sched_timer+0x64/0xb0
[] __hrtimer_run_queues+0x156/0x2f4
[] hrtimer_interrupt+0xe2/0x1fe
[] riscv_timer_interrupt+0x38/0x42
[] handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x1d2
[] generic_handle_domain_irq+0x28/0x36
After referring other PMU drivers like Arm, Loongarch, Csky, and Mips,
they don't call *_pmu_stop() to update with PERF_HES_STOPPED flag
after perf_event_overflow() function nor do they add PERF_HES_STOPPED
flag checking in *_pmu_start() which don't cause this warning.
Thus, it's recommended to remove this unnecessary check in
riscv_pmu_start() function to prevent this warning.
Impact
CVE-2023-53583 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2023-53583? CVE-2023-53583 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2023-53583? CVE-2023-53583 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2023-53583? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2023-53583 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2023-53583 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2023-53583 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2023-53583 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.