Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netsched: schsfq: move the...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net_sched: sch_sfq: move the limit validation
It is not sufficient to directly validate the limit on the data that
the user passes as it can be updated based on how the other parameters
are changed.
Move the check at the end of the configuration update process to also
catch scenarios where the limit is indirectly updated, for example
with the following configurations:
tc qdisc add dev dummy0 handle 1: root sfq limit 2 flows 1 depth 1
tc qdisc add dev dummy0 handle 1: root sfq limit 2 flows 1 divisor 1
This fixes the following syzkaller reported crash:
------------[ cut here ]------------
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in net/sched/sch_sfq.c:203:6
index 65535 is out of range for type 'struct sfq_head[128]'
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 3037 Comm: syz.2.16 Not tainted 6.14.0-rc2-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 12/27/2024
Call Trace:
__dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
dump_stack_lvl+0x201/0x300 lib/dump_stack.c:120
ubsan_epilogue lib/ubsan.c:231 [inline]
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0xf5/0x120 lib/ubsan.c:429
sfq_link net/sched/sch_sfq.c:203 [inline]
sfq_dec+0x53c/0x610 net/sched/sch_sfq.c:231
sfq_dequeue+0x34e/0x8c0 net/sched/sch_sfq.c:493
sfq_reset+0x17/0x60 net/sched/sch_sfq.c:518
qdisc_reset+0x12e/0x600 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1035
tbf_reset+0x41/0x110 net/sched/sch_tbf.c:339
qdisc_reset+0x12e/0x600 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1035
dev_reset_queue+0x100/0x1b0 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1311
netdev_for_each_tx_queue include/linux/netdevice.h:2590 [inline]
dev_deactivate_many+0x7e5/0xe70 net/sched/sch_generic.c:1375
Impact
CVE-2025-37752 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-37752? CVE-2025-37752 is a high-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-37752? CVE-2025-37752 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-37752? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-37752 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-37752 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-37752 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-37752 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.