Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: reject on-disk inodes...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
jfs: reject on-disk inodes of an unsupported type
Syzbot has reported the following BUG:
kernel BUG at fs/inode.c:668!
Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN PTI
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 139 Comm: jfsCommit Not tainted 6.12.0-rc4-syzkaller-00085-g4e46774408d9 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:clear_inode+0x168/0x190
Code: 4c 89 f7 e8 ba fe e5 ff e9 61 ff ff ff 44 89 f1 80 e1 07 80 c1 03 38 c1 7c c1 4c 89 f7 e8 90 ff e5 ff eb b7
0b e8 01 5d 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f9 5c 7f ff 90 0f 0b e8 f1 5c 7f
RSP: 0018:ffffc900027dfae8 EFLAGS: 00010093
RAX: ffffffff82157a87 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888104d4b980
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: ffffc900027dfc90 R08: ffffffff82157977 R09: fffff520004fbf38
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff520004fbf38 R12: dffffc0000000000
R13: ffff88811315bc00 R14: ffff88811315bda8 R15: ffff88811315bb80
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff888135f00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00005565222e0578 CR3: 0000000026ef0000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
Call Trace:
? __die_body+0x5f/0xb0
? die+0x9e/0xc0
? do_trap+0x15a/0x3a0
? clear_inode+0x168/0x190
? do_error_trap+0x1dc/0x2c0
? clear_inode+0x168/0x190
? __pfx_do_error_trap+0x10/0x10
? report_bug+0x3cd/0x500
? handle_invalid_op+0x34/0x40
? clear_inode+0x168/0x190
? exc_invalid_op+0x38/0x50
? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
? clear_inode+0x57/0x190
? clear_inode+0x167/0x190
? clear_inode+0x168/0x190
? clear_inode+0x167/0x190
jfs_evict_inode+0xb5/0x440
? __pfx_jfs_evict_inode+0x10/0x10
evict+0x4ea/0x9b0
? __pfx_evict+0x10/0x10
? iput+0x713/0xa50
txUpdateMap+0x931/0xb10
? __pfx_txUpdateMap+0x10/0x10
jfs_lazycommit+0x49a/0xb80
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8f/0x140
? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x99/0x150
? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_default_wake_function+0x10/0x10
? __kthread_parkme+0x169/0x1d0
? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x2f2/0x390
? __pfx_jfs_lazycommit+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
This happens when 'clear_inode()' makes an attempt to finalize an underlying
JFS inode of unknown type. According to JFS layout description from
https://jfs.sourceforge.net/project/pub/jfslayout.pdf, inode types from 5 to
15 are reserved for future extensions and should not be encountered on a valid
filesystem. So add an extra check for valid inode type in 'copy_from_dinode()'.
Impact
CVE-2025-37925 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-37925? CVE-2025-37925 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-37925? CVE-2025-37925 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-37925? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-37925 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-37925 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-37925 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-37925 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.