Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ice: fix Tx scheduler error...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
ice: fix Tx scheduler error handling in XDP callback
When the XDP program is loaded, the XDP callback adds new Tx queues.
This means that the callback must update the Tx scheduler with the new
queue number. In the event of a Tx scheduler failure, the XDP callback
should also fail and roll back any changes previously made for XDP
preparation.
The previous implementation had a bug that not all changes made by the
XDP callback were rolled back. This caused the crash with the following
call trace:
[ +9.549584] ice 0000:ca:00.0: Failed VSI LAN queue config for XDP, error: -5
[ +0.382335] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x50a2250a90495525: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
[ +0.010710] CPU: 103 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/103 Not tainted 6.14.0-net-next-mar-31+ #14 PREEMPT(voluntary)
[ +0.010175] Hardware name: Intel Corporation M50CYP2SBSTD/M50CYP2SBSTD, BIOS SE5C620.86B.01.01.0005.2202160810 02/16/2022
[ +0.010946] RIP: 0010:__ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice]
[...]
[ +0.002715] Call Trace:
[ +0.002452]
[ +0.002021] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x29
[ +0.003922] ? die_addr+0x3c/0x60
[ +0.003319] ? exc_general_protection+0x17c/0x400
[ +0.004707] ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x26/0x30
[ +0.004879] ? __ice_update_sample+0x39/0xe0 [ice]
[ +0.004835] ice_napi_poll+0x665/0x680 [ice]
[ +0.004320] __napi_poll+0x28/0x190
[ +0.003500] net_rx_action+0x198/0x360
[ +0.003752] ? update_rq_clock+0x39/0x220
[ +0.004013] handle_softirqs+0xf1/0x340
[ +0.003840] ? sched_clock_cpu+0xf/0x1f0
[ +0.003925] __irq_exit_rcu+0xc2/0xe0
[ +0.003665] common_interrupt+0x85/0xa0
[ +0.003839]
[ +0.002098]
[ +0.002106] asm_common_interrupt+0x26/0x40
[ +0.004184] RIP: 0010:cpuidle_enter_state+0xd3/0x690
Fix this by performing the missing unmapping of XDP queues from
q_vectors and setting the XDP rings pointer back to NULL after all those
queues are released.
Also, add an immediate exit from the XDP callback in case of ring
preparation failure.
Impact
CVE-2025-38127 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-38127? CVE-2025-38127 is a medium-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- How severe is CVE-2025-38127? CVE-2025-38127 has a CVSS score of 5.5 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-38127? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-38127 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-38127 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-38127 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-38127 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.