Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: intel-thc-hid: intel...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
HID: intel-thc-hid: intel-quicki2c: Fix ACPI dsd ICRS/ISUB length
The QuickI2C ACPI _DSD methods return ICRS and ISUB data with a
trailing byte, making the actual length is one more byte than the
structs defined.
It caused stack-out-of-bounds and kernel crash:
kernel: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in quicki2c_acpi_get_dsd_property.constprop.0+0x111/0x1b0 [intel_quicki2c]
kernel: Write of size 12 at addr ffff888106d1f900 by task kworker/u33:2/75
kernel:
kernel: CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 75 Comm: kworker/u33:2 Not tainted 6.16.0+ #3 PREEMPT(voluntary)
kernel: Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel:
kernel: dump_stack_lvl+0x76/0xa0
kernel: print_report+0xd1/0x660
kernel: ? __pfx__raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x10/0x10
kernel: ? __kasan_slab_free+0x5d/0x80
kernel: ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0xd/0xb0
kernel: kasan_report+0xe1/0x120
kernel: ? quicki2c_acpi_get_dsd_property.constprop.0+0x111/0x1b0 [intel_quicki2c]
kernel: ? quicki2c_acpi_get_dsd_property.constprop.0+0x111/0x1b0 [intel_quicki2c]
kernel: kasan_check_range+0x11c/0x200
kernel: __asan_memcpy+0x3b/0x80
kernel: quicki2c_acpi_get_dsd_property.constprop.0+0x111/0x1b0 [intel_quicki2c]
kernel: ? __pfx_quicki2c_acpi_get_dsd_property.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 [intel_quicki2c]
kernel: quicki2c_get_acpi_resources+0x237/0x730 [intel_quicki2c]
[...]
kernel:
kernel:
kernel: The buggy address belongs to stack of task kworker/u33:2/75
kernel: and is located at offset 48 in frame:
kernel: quicki2c_get_acpi_resources+0x0/0x730 [intel_quicki2c]
kernel:
kernel: This frame has 3 objects:
kernel: [32, 36) 'hid_desc_addr'
kernel: [48, 59) 'i2c_param'
kernel: [80, 224) 'i2c_config'
ACPI DSD methods return:
_SB.PC00.THC0.ICRS Buffer 000000003fdc947b 001 Len 0C = 0A 00 80 1A 06 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
_SB.PC00.THC0.ISUB Buffer 00000000f2fcbdc4 001 Len 91 = 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Adding reserved padding to quicki2c_subip_acpi_parameter/config.
Impact
A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary. Typical impact: memory corruption, crash, or arbitrary code execution.
CVE-2025-39809 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). The vector is requires local access, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. No fixed version is listed yet, so configuration controls and monitoring matter more in the interim.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-39809? CVE-2025-39809 is a high-severity out-of-bounds write vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet. A write operation targets a memory location beyond the intended buffer boundary.
- How severe is CVE-2025-39809? CVE-2025-39809 has a CVSS score of 7.8 (High). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-39809? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-39809 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-39809 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-39809 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-39809 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.