Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/x86/intel: Fix...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86/intel: Fix IA32_PMC_x_CFG_B MSRs access error
When running perf_fuzzer on PTL, sometimes the below "unchecked MSR
access error" is seen when accessing IA32_PMC_x_CFG_B MSRs.
[ 55.611268] unchecked MSR access error: WRMSR to 0x1986 (tried to write 0x0000000200000001) at rIP: 0xffffffffac564b28 (native_write_msr+0x8/0x30)
[ 55.611280] Call Trace:
[ 55.611282]
[ 55.611284] ? intel_pmu_config_acr+0x87/0x160
[ 55.611289] intel_pmu_enable_acr+0x6d/0x80
[ 55.611291] intel_pmu_enable_event+0xce/0x460
[ 55.611293] x86_pmu_start+0x78/0xb0
[ 55.611297] x86_pmu_enable+0x218/0x3a0
[ 55.611300] ? x86_pmu_enable+0x121/0x3a0
[ 55.611302] perf_pmu_enable+0x40/0x50
[ 55.611307] ctx_resched+0x19d/0x220
[ 55.611309] __perf_install_in_context+0x284/0x2f0
[ 55.611311] ? __pfx_remote_function+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611314] remote_function+0x52/0x70
[ 55.611317] ? __pfx_remote_function+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611319] generic_exec_single+0x84/0x150
[ 55.611323] smp_call_function_single+0xc5/0x1a0
[ 55.611326] ? __pfx_remote_function+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611329] perf_install_in_context+0xd1/0x1e0
[ 55.611331] ? __pfx___perf_install_in_context+0x10/0x10
[ 55.611333] __do_sys_perf_event_open+0xa76/0x1040
[ 55.611336] __x64_sys_perf_event_open+0x26/0x30
[ 55.611337] x64_sys_call+0x1d8e/0x20c0
[ 55.611339] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x120
[ 55.611343] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
On PTL, GP counter 0 and 1 doesn't support auto counter reload feature,
thus it would trigger a #GP when trying to write 1 on bit 0 of CFG_B MSR
which requires to enable auto counter reload on GP counter 0.
The root cause of causing this issue is the check for auto counter
reload (ACR) counter mask from user space is incorrect in
intel_pmu_acr_late_setup() helper. It leads to an invalid ACR counter
mask from user space could be set into hw.config1 and then written into
CFG_B MSRs and trigger the MSR access warning.
e.g., User may create a perf event with ACR counter mask (config2=0xcb),
and there is only 1 event created, so "cpuc->n_events" is 1.
The correct check condition should be "i + idx >= cpuc->n_events"
instead of "i + idx > cpuc->n_events" (it looks a typo). Otherwise,
the counter mask would traverse twice and an invalid "cpuc->assign[1]"
bit (bit 0) is set into hw.config1 and cause MSR accessing error.
Besides, also check if the ACR counter mask corresponding events are
ACR events. If not, filter out these counter mask. If a event is not a
ACR event, it could be scheduled to an HW counter which doesn't support
ACR. It's invalid to add their counter index in ACR counter mask.
Furthermore, remove the WARN_ON_ONCE() since it's easily triggered as
user could set any invalid ACR counter mask and the warning message
could mislead users.
Impact
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-40122? CVE-2025-40122 is a unknown-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-40122? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-40122 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-40122 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-40122 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-40122 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.