Summary
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sysfs: check visibility...
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
sysfs: check visibility before changing group attribute ownership
Since commit 0c17270f9b92 ("net: sysfs: Implement is_visible for
phys_(port_id, port_name, switch_id)"), __dev_change_net_namespace() can
hit WARN_ON() when trying to change owner of a file that isn't visible.
See the trace below:
WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 2938 at net/core/dev.c:12410 __dev_change_net_namespace+0xb89/0xc30
CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 2938 Comm: incusd Not tainted 6.17.1-1-mainline #1 PREEMPT(full) 4b783b4a638669fb644857f484487d17cb45ed1f
Hardware name: Framework Laptop 13 (AMD Ryzen 7040Series)/FRANMDCP07, BIOS 03.07 02/19/2025
RIP: 0010:__dev_change_net_namespace+0xb89/0xc30
[...]
Call Trace:
? if6_seq_show+0x30/0x50
do_setlink.isra.0+0xc7/0x1270
? __nla_validate_parse+0x5c/0xcc0
? security_capable+0x94/0x1a0
rtnl_newlink+0x858/0xc20
? update_curr+0x8e/0x1c0
? update_entity_lag+0x71/0x80
? sched_balance_newidle+0x358/0x450
? psi_task_switch+0x113/0x2a0
? __pfx_rtnl_newlink+0x10/0x10
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x346/0x3e0
? sched_clock+0x10/0x30
? __pfx_rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10
netlink_rcv_skb+0x59/0x110
netlink_unicast+0x285/0x3c0
? __alloc_skb+0xdb/0x1a0
netlink_sendmsg+0x20d/0x430
____sys_sendmsg+0x39f/0x3d0
? import_iovec+0x2f/0x40
___sys_sendmsg+0x99/0xe0
__sys_sendmsg+0x8a/0xf0
do_syscall_64+0x81/0x970
? __sys_bind+0xe3/0x110
? syscall_exit_work+0x143/0x1b0
? do_syscall_64+0x244/0x970
? sock_alloc_file+0x63/0xc0
? syscall_exit_work+0x143/0x1b0
? do_syscall_64+0x244/0x970
? alloc_fd+0x12e/0x190
? put_unused_fd+0x2a/0x70
? do_sys_openat2+0xa2/0xe0
? syscall_exit_work+0x143/0x1b0
? do_syscall_64+0x244/0x970
? exc_page_fault+0x7e/0x1a0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
[...]
Fix this by checking is_visible() before trying to touch the attribute.
Impact
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-40355? CVE-2025-40355 is a unknown-severity security vulnerability. No fixed version is listed yet.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-40355? No fixed version is listed for CVE-2025-40355 yet. Monitor the advisory for updates and apply mitigations in the interim.
- Is CVE-2025-40355 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-40355 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-40355 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.