Summary
Fiber Utils UUIDv4 and UUID Silent Fallback to Predictable Values
Critical security vulnerabilities exist in both the UUIDv4() and UUID() functions of the github.com/gofiber/utils package. When the system's cryptographic random number generator (crypto/rand) fails, both functions silently fall back to returning predictable UUID values, the zero UUID "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000". This compromises the security of all Fiber applications using these functions for security-critical operations on Go versions prior to 1.24.
Both functions are vulnerable to the same root cause (crypto/rand failure):
UUIDv4(): Indirect vulnerability throughuuid.NewRandom()→crypto/rand.Read()→ fallback toUUID()UUID(): Direct vulnerability throughcrypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:])→ silent zero UUID return
Note: Go 1.24 and later panics on crypto/rand Read() failures, mitigating this vulnerability. Applications running on Go 1.24+ are not affected by the silent fallback behavior.
Vulnerability Details
Affected Functions
- Package:
github.com/gofiber/utils - Functions:
UUIDv4()andUUID() - Return Type:
string(both functions) - Locations:
common.go:93-99(UUIDv4),common.go:60-89(UUID)
Technical Description
The vulnerability occurs through two related but distinct failure paths, both ultimately caused by crypto/rand.Read() failures on Go < 1.24:
Primary Path: UUIDv4() Vulnerability
UUIDv4()callsgoogle/uuid.NewRandom()which internally usescrypto/rand.Read()- If
uuid.NewRandom()fails,UUIDv4()falls back to the internalUUID()function - No error is returned to the application - silent security failure occurs
Secondary Path: UUID() Vulnerability
UUID()directly callscrypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:])to seed its internal state- If seeding fails,
UUID()silently fails and returns the zero UUID"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" - Applications receive predictable UUIDs with no indication of the security failure
Code Analysis
UUIDv4() Vulnerability Path
func UUIDv4() string {
token, err := uuid.NewRandom() // Uses crypto/rand.Read() internally
if err != nil {
return UUID() // Dangerous fallback - no error returned to application
}
return token.String()
}
UUID() Vulnerability Path
func UUID() string {
uuidSetup.Do(func() {
if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil { // Direct crypto/rand.Read() call
return // Silent failure - no seeding, uuidCounter remains 0
}
uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
})
if atomic.LoadUint64(&uuidCounter) <= 0 {
return "00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000" // Zero UUID returned silently
}
// ... generate UUID from counter
}
Root Cause: Both vulnerabilities stem from crypto/rand.Read() failures, occurring through different code paths with the same dangerous silent fallback behavior.
Security Impact
Severity: CRITICAL
This issue is especially severe because many Fiber middleware packages (session, CSRF, auth, rate-limit, request-ID, etc.) default to utils.UUIDv4() for generating security-sensitive identifiers. A failure in crypto/rand would cause every generated identifier across the entire application to collapse to a single predictable value (the zero UUID), resulting in:
- Session fixation / universal session hijack
- CSRF token predictability and bypass
- Authentication token replay
- Global identifier collisions leading to severe application breakage
- Potential application-wide DoS due to every request using the same “unique” key, causing cache overwrites, session stomping, corrupted internal maps, and loss of isolation across all users
Attack Scenario
While entropy exhaustion is extremely rare on modern Linux systems, RNG access failures (e.g., restricted /dev/random or /dev/urandom access, broken container environments, sandbox restrictions, misconfigured VMs, or FIPS-mode RNG failures) are realistic. In these scenarios on Go < 1.24, crypto/rand may return errors immediately, triggering the vulnerable fallback paths.
On Go 1.24+, crypto/rand Read() panics on failure, mitigating the silent-zero fallback issue.
Proof of Concept
uuid.NewRandom()fails (indirectcrypto/rand.Read()failure)UUIDv4()callsUUID()as fallback with no error returnedUUID()seeding fails directly viacrypto/rand.Read(uuidSeed[:])- Zero UUID
"00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"is returned silently - No error is propagated to the application from either function
Affected Versions
- All versions of
github.com/gofiber/utilscontaining theUUIDv4()orUUID()functions - Applications using Fiber middleware that depend on
UUIDv4()orUUIDfor security - Only applicable to Go < 1.24; Go 1.24+ panics/block on
crypto/randRead()failures and is not affected
Mitigation
Immediate Workaround
Replace usage of utils.UUIDv4() with uuid.New() or wait for fix:
sessionID := uuid.New()
Detection
Applications can detect if they're affected by:
- Checking if they use
github.com/gofiber/utils - Searching for
UUIDv4()andUUID()usage in security-critical code paths - Reviewing Fiber middleware configurations that rely on defaults of
UUIDv4()for security identifiers
References
- Package Repository: https://github.com/gofiber/utils
- Fiber Framework: https://github.com/gofiber/fiber
- Google UUID Library: https://github.com/google/uuid
- Golang
crypto/randbehavior changes: golang/go#66821, Go 1.25.5 source
Contact
Reported by: @sixcolors
Classification
- OWASP: A02:2021 - Cryptographic Failures
- Impact: Complete compromise of application security model on Go < 1.24
- Exploitability: Medium (requires entropy failure)
- Scope: All Fiber applications using affected middleware on Go < 1.24
Impact
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Modify utils.UUIDv4() and utils.UUID() to fail explicitly when cryptographic randomness is unavailable:
func UUIDv4() string {
token, err := uuid.NewRandom()
if err != nil {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to generate secure UUID: %v", err))
}
return token.String()
}
func UUID() string {
uuidSetup.Do(func() {
if _, err := rand.Read(uuidSeed[:]); err != nil {
panic(fmt.Sprintf("utils: failed to seed UUID generator: %v", err))
}
uuidCounter = binary.LittleEndian.Uint64(uuidSeed[:8])
})
if atomic.LoadUint64(&uuidCounter) <= 0 {
panic("utils: UUID generator not properly seeded")
}
// ... generate UUID from counter
}
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2025-66565? CVE-2025-66565 is a critical-severity security vulnerability in github.com/gofiber/utils/v2 (go), affecting versions < 2.0.0-rc.3.0.20251205210924-6c6cf047032b. It is fixed in 2.0.0-rc.4, 1.2.0.
- Which packages are affected by CVE-2025-66565?
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2(go) (versions < 2.0.0-rc.3.0.20251205210924-6c6cf047032b)github.com/gofiber/utils(go) (versions <= 1.1.0)
- Is there a fix for CVE-2025-66565? Yes. CVE-2025-66565 is fixed in 2.0.0-rc.4, 1.2.0. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2025-66565 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2025-66565 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2025-66565 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2025-66565?
- Upgrade
github.com/gofiber/utils/v2to 2.0.0-rc.4 or later - Upgrade
github.com/gofiber/utilsto 1.2.0 or later
- Upgrade