Summary
Contao: Improper access control in the table access voter
Due to a caching defect in the security voter that governs table-level access to Contao's Data Container (DCA) backend, a low-privileged, non-admin backend user can obtain unauthorized read, create, update, and delete access to database tables outside their assigned module permissions. This includes tables containing sensitive personal data, such as frontend member records and newsletter subscriber e-mail addresses.
Vulnerability Details
In plain terms: Contao's backend is organized into modules (e.g. "News", "Members"). Every backend user is assigned to a group, and that group decides which modules, and therefore which database tables, they are allowed to work with. Before Contao lets a user touch a table, it is supposed to check: "does this user's group actually include this table?"
To avoid doing that check over and over, Contao remembers the answer for the rest of the request. The problem is that it remembers the answer under the wrong label. Instead of remembering "is this user allowed to access table X", it only remembers "is this user allowed to access something", without recording which table the answer was actually about.
So if a request first checks a table the user IS allowed to see, and then checks a second, completely different table the user is NOT allowed to see, Contao reuses the first answer for the second table too. The user ends up with access to a table their group was never given permission for.
Technical detail
Contao's backend enforces per-table access control through a chain of Symfony security voters. The relevant one isTableAccessVoter::hasAccessToModule(), in core-bundle/src/Security/Voter/DataContainer/TableAccessVoter.php:
private array $canAccessTable = [];
private array $canReadAccessTable = [];
private function hasAccessToModule(TokenInterface $token, ...): bool
{
$tokenHash = hash('xxh128', serialize($token));
if (isset($this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash]) || (...)) {
return $this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash] ?? $this->canReadAccessTable[$tokenHash];
}
$table = $subject->getDataSource();
foreach ($GLOBALS['BE_MOD'] as $modules) {
...
return $this->canAccessTable[$tokenHash] = true; // or false
}
}
The cache key, $tokenHash, is built only from the current user's security token. It does not include the table being checked. Because TableAccessVoter is a normal, shared Symfony service, this cache stays alive for the whole duration of one HTTP request. So the first table checked for a user in a request decides the cached answer for every other table checked afterwards in that same request, whether or not that answer is actually correct for the second table.
This is made worse by DefaultDataContainerVoter, a low-priority, permissive fallback voter that grants access to any table-related permission unless another voter explicitly denies it. When TableAccessVoter gives a wrong "no opinion" answer because of the stale cache, this fallback voter turns that into a full grant.
Most database tables in Contao have no second, table-specific check to catch this. Only tl_content, tl_favorites, tl_form, tl_form_field, tl_module, tl_image_size(_item), tl_job, tl_layout, tl_page, tl_preview_link, tl_undo, and tl_user have one. Tables such as tl_member (website member data), tl_newsletter_recipients (subscriber e-mail addresses), tl_news, tl_calendar_events, tl_faq, and tl_comments rely only on the defective check described above.
Credits
This security vulnerability was found by Sven Jäger of SySS GmbH.
Impact
The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions. Typical impact: unauthorized data access or execution of privileged operations.
CVE-2026-107851 has a CVSS score of 4.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, low privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (5.7.12); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.
Affected versions
Security releases
Kodem intelligence
Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.
Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.
Already deployed Kodem?
See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →Remediation advice
Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is CVE-2026-107851? CVE-2026-107851 is a medium-severity incorrect authorization vulnerability in contao/core-bundle (composer), affecting versions >= 5.7.0, < 5.7.12. It is fixed in 5.7.12. The application does not correctly enforce access controls, allowing a principal to access resources or operations beyond their granted permissions.
- How severe is CVE-2026-107851? CVE-2026-107851 has a CVSS score of 4.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
- Which versions of contao/core-bundle are affected by CVE-2026-107851? contao/core-bundle (composer) versions >= 5.7.0, < 5.7.12 is affected.
- Is there a fix for CVE-2026-107851? Yes. CVE-2026-107851 is fixed in 5.7.12. Upgrade to this version or later.
- Is CVE-2026-107851 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-107851 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
- What actually determines whether CVE-2026-107851 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
- How do I fix CVE-2026-107851? Upgrade
contao/core-bundleto 5.7.12 or later.