CVE-2026-113650

CVE-2026-113650 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in sanitize-html (npm), affecting versions >= 2.18.0, < 2.18.1. It is fixed in 2.18.1.

Does this CVE actually affect you?

Kodem shows which CVEs are reachable and running in your applications, so you fix what's exploitable, not just what's listed.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Runtime intelligence, not another scanner.

Summary

ApostropheCMS sanitize-html: unbounded recursion when re-sanitizing the fallback of a discarded iframe (stack overflow, nestingLimit not enforced)

Since 2.18.0, when an <iframe> is not allowed and disallowedTagsMode is 'discard' (the defaults),
its raw-text content is re-sanitized by a recursive call to sanitizeHtml(text, options) (the change
from #5564, fixing #5550). The recursion has no bound and starts each nested call with a fresh state.
Two consequences, both absent from 2.17.7 and 2.17.4:

  1. A few kilobytes of unclosed <iframe> tags throw RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
    with the default options. Any application that sanitizes untrusted HTML with 2.18.0 can be made to
    throw on a small crafted input.
  2. nestingLimit is not enforced across a discarded iframe: each nested iframe restarts the depth
    count at zero, so the output can be nested arbitrarily deep regardless of the configured limit.

Affected versions

  • 2.18.0 (the current latest), and the main branch at the time of writing (the recursive call is
    still in packages/sanitize-html/index.js, in the ontext handler, branch
    tag === 'iframe' && !tagAllowed(tag) && options.disallowedTagsMode === 'discard').
  • Not affected: 2.17.7 and 2.17.4 (tested with the same inputs below).

Tested with Node.js v26.7.0.

Reproduction 1: stack overflow with the default options

const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');

// with 2.18.0:
sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(1000));  // 8,000 chars: returns ''
sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(2000));  // 16,000 chars: throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
sanitizeHtml('<iframe>'.repeat(20000)); // 160,000 chars: throws RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

Results:

input 2.17.4 2.17.7 2.18.0
'<iframe>'.repeat(1000) ok ok ok
'<iframe>'.repeat(2000) ok ok RangeError
'<iframe>'.repeat(20000) ok ok RangeError

The threshold depends on the remaining stack, so it is lower when sanitizeHtml is called from an
already deep call stack (for example inside a server-side rendering pass).

Reproduction 2: nestingLimit is bypassed

const sanitizeHtml = require('sanitize-html');

const input = ('<iframe>' + '<b>'.repeat(3)).repeat(50) + 'x';
const out = sanitizeHtml(input, { allowedTags: ['b'], nestingLimit: 3 });
// maximum nesting depth of <b> in `out`:
//   2.17.4: 2    2.17.7: 0 (fallback escaped as text)    2.18.0: 150

Without an iframe, the same options cap the output at three nested <b> in all three versions. With
k repetitions of '<iframe>' + '<b>'.repeat(3), 2.18.0 returns 3 * k nested <b> (measured for
k = 1, 5, 50: depth 3, 15, 150).

Cause

In 2.18.0 the ontext handler does:

} else if (
  tag === 'iframe' &&
  !tagAllowed(tag) &&
  options.disallowedTagsMode === 'discard'
) {
  result += sanitizeHtml(text, options);
}

Because htmlparser2 treats <iframe> as a raw-text element, the text of an unclosed iframe is the whole
remainder of the input; re-parsing it can meet another unclosed <iframe>, and so on, one stack frame
(and one full re-parse) per iframe. The nested call also starts with its own depth, so tags inside the
fallback are not counted against nestingLimit together with the enclosing tags.

Possible directions

Not a patch, only what would close both effects: bound the recursion (or process the fallback without
recursing), and carry the current depth into the nested sanitization so that nestingLimit applies to
the whole output.

Impact

CVE-2026-113650 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). The vector is network-reachable, no privileges required, and no user interaction. A CVSS score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether this affects your application depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable in your environment. A fixed version is available (2.18.1); upgrading removes the vulnerable code path.

Affected versions

sanitize-html (>= 2.18.0, < 2.18.1)

Security releases

sanitize-html → 2.18.1 (npm)

Kodem intelligence

Severity tells you how bad this could be in the worst case. It does not tell you whether you are exposed. Exploitability and impact are functions of runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A vulnerable package can sit in your dependency tree and never run.

Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter. Kodem's runtime-powered SCA identifies whether this CVE is reachable in your applications.

Already deployed Kodem?

See it in your environmentNew to Kodem? Get a demo →

Remediation advice

Upgrade sanitize-html to 2.18.1 or later to resolve this vulnerability.

Kodem Kai can prioritize this vulnerability in your dependency tree and generate a fix recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions

  1. What is CVE-2026-113650? CVE-2026-113650 is a medium-severity security vulnerability in sanitize-html (npm), affecting versions >= 2.18.0, < 2.18.1. It is fixed in 2.18.1.
  2. How severe is CVE-2026-113650? CVE-2026-113650 has a CVSS score of 5.3 (Medium). This score reflects the worst-case severity of the vulnerability, not your specific exposure. Whether it represents real risk in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable.
  3. Which versions of sanitize-html are affected by CVE-2026-113650? sanitize-html (npm) versions >= 2.18.0, < 2.18.1 is affected.
  4. Is there a fix for CVE-2026-113650? Yes. CVE-2026-113650 is fixed in 2.18.1. Upgrade to this version or later.
  5. Is CVE-2026-113650 exploitable, and should I be worried? Whether CVE-2026-113650 is exploitable in your environment depends on whether the vulnerable code is present and reachable. A CVSS score is a worst-case rating; it does not account for your specific deployment, configuration, or usage patterns. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to show which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so you can focus on the ones that represent real risk. Get a demo
  6. What actually determines whether CVE-2026-113650 is exploitable, and how bad it is? Exploitability and impact are not fixed properties of a CVE. They depend on runtime truth: whether the vulnerable code is present, reachable, and actually executes in your application. A high CVSS score on a dependency that never runs is not the same as real risk. Kodem, an Intelligent Application Security platform, uses runtime intelligence to reveal which vulnerabilities actually execute in production, so teams prioritize the ones that genuinely matter.
  7. How do I fix CVE-2026-113650? Upgrade sanitize-html to 2.18.1 or later.

Other vulnerabilities in sanitize-html

Stop the waste.
Protect your environment with Kodem.